IWA Sunday January 21, 2007



Hey folks,

This weeks winner, is a winner for two reasons. Wining, and lying. I just get so tire of hearing the LWL and some of their most nuttiest card carrying members get away with wining and lying. I still cannot figure out why they seem, to still be so angry. They WON.

This example is another member of the " Huffy Post." It seems that she is all upset over the use of Democrat being used in reference to her party. She wrote,

"There are two major political parties in the United States -- the Republican and the Democratic -- but you wouldn't know that from many of today's supposedly "objective" journalists. No, like GOP speakers and rightwing talk radio hosts, more and more "reporters" talk about the Democrat Party, considered an epithet (and not a kindly one). CBS's Scott Pelley irked more than a few people in his 60 Minutes interview with President Bush by his regular references to the "Democrat Party," and I've heard similar references on NPR, among others."

STOP!!!! {Laughing} she is going after NPR???? She is upset and trying to get you to buy the fact that the MMD {Mass Media Drones} are on the Conservative side? This is too funny. She goes on,,

"Media Matters has been all over this issue, with examples from the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, AP, CNN and CBS among others, and continues to track them. Why does it matter? Words mean something -- and that's not just the editor-within obsessing about style guides. Media Matters cites Hendrik Hertzberg's essay in The New Yorker:

There's no great mystery about the motives behind this deliberate misnaming. "Democrat Party" is a slur, or intended to be--a handy way to express contempt. Aesthetic judgments are subjective, of course, but "Democrat Party" is jarring verging on ugly. It fairly screams "rat." At a slightly higher level of sophistication, it's an attempt to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation."

Democrat Party is equal to calling them "rat?" I did not know that. I doubt if most of you did either. As a matter of fact, if you want to go to the official DEMOCRAT site it is http://www.democrats.org/ One of the things on their front page is,

"Thursday and allowed the passage of new ethics rules in the Senate by Democrats."

Are they that self loathing? So I guess according to Michelle Pilecki to get to this website you could type in www RATS. Right?


This is stupid people. You do not even call yourselves the Democratic Party. Some how THIS is your new problem with the Republicans? {Laughing} They mean the same thing.

According to this piece,

"Those two letters actually do matter," Luntz said the other day. He added that he recently finished writing a book--it's entitled Words That Work--and has been diligently going through the galley proofs taking out the hundreds of "ic"s that his copy editor, one of those partisan Dems, had stuck in.

Am I missing something here? This guy Luntz, who just wrote a book about words. Said "-and has been diligently going through the galley proofs taking out the hundreds of "ic"s that his copy editor, one of those partisan Dems, had stuck in."

If he is taking OUT the IC, would that then mean that all those words are now Democrat. So he sees this a bad? Or she sees him doing this as bad? Is this bad? Who’s bad?

{Sigh} Congratulations Michelle Pilecki , for using this to further the never ending attacks on the President and the Republican Party, and for attempting to get us to believe that the Liberal Media, owned by, funded by, and told what to report by, George Soros, is Conservative or at least lean Conservative, makes you the Idiot of the Week. You Won, be happy.
Peter