IWA For 060108

New World Order Coming

Hey folks,

Just this past March 30, 2008, I posted OPNTalk - Many See McCain As A Liberal In it I posted the AIM {Accuracy In Media} piece by Cliff Kincaid "McCain’s Incoherent New World Order" in which Cliff Kincaid wrote this.

Noting that McCain committed himself to adoption of a new U.N.-sponsored global warming treaty, which would be even more comprehensive and tougher than the Kyoto Protocol, Limbaugh said that “The theme here is that there’s nothing special about America, and that we’re not going to be able to do anything without involving other nations and making them like us and showing them that we intend them no harm and that we want to be good stewards of the planet just as they want to be good stewards.”

The latter was a reference to McCain declaring that “We need to be good stewards of our planet and join with other nations to help preserve our common home. The risks of global warming have no borders.” McCain sounded like another Democrat―Al Gore.

But despite his preference for what appears to be some kind of New World Order, McCain’s prior endorsement of a new Muslim state in Europe by the name of Kosovo could undermine all of his best-laid plans. Recognition of Kosovo could lead to war with Russia and more terrorist problems for Israel.

Well a New World Order DOES seem to be what McCain REALLY wants. Get this from the AP - McCain proposal for joint action gains support By BARRY SCHWEID, AP Diplomatic Writer

Gaining ground this political season is a proposed League of Democracies designed to strengthen support for the next president's overseas agenda and ensure a global leadership role for the United States.

No it will not. What it WILL do is turn over the Sovereignty of the United States to this new World Order.

John McCain, the virtually certain Republican presidential nominee, has endorsed the concept of a new global compact of more than 100 democratic countries to advance shared views and has discussed the idea with French and British leaders.

"It could act where the U.N. fails to act," he said last month, and pressure tyrants "with or without Moscow's and Beijing's approval."

So forget the UN. McCain's plan is actually much worse.

McCain said the League might impose sanctions on Iran, relieve suffering in the Darfur region of Sudan and deal with environmental problems.

GLOBAL WARMING BS. This is the "reason" some will accept this. It is to save the planet.

Barack Obama, who has a lead in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, has not taken a stand. But Anthony Lake, one of Obama's policy advisers, has spoken in favor of the idea.

Analysts at think tanks in Washington and elsewhere envision a league focused on maintaining peace and limiting U.S. military intervention, such as the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Did you get that? Read that again. "maintaining peace and limiting U.S. military intervention, such as the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq."

That means that we will not be able to use force if we need to without this New World Order's permission. We will be giving up our own security. Our own freedom, our own sovereignty.

But missing so far are specific, proposed steps to turn the idea into reality, such as where to have a headquarters, who would finance the league and how its membership would be decided.

"Cooperation is an absolute essential," Ivo Daalder, a national security expert at the Brookings Institution, said Thursday at a seminar.

An originator of the idea, Daalder said it would give democracies a better opportunity to reform the United Nations.

If there had been a dialogue on Iraq there would have been more rigorous containment of Saddam Hussein, "possibly averting war," said Tod Lindberg, a Hoover Institution research fellow, at the seminar held at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

But not all foreign policy experts support the proposal.

Thomas Carothers, vice president for studies at Carnegie, said the world has no appetite for a U.S.-led league and many countries do not want the U.S. going around the U.N.

In fact, Carothers said, the United States cooperates often with non-democracies in its foreign policy. China's help in trying to end North Korea's nuclear weapons program is just one example, he said.

President Bush's Iraq war policy was bitterly opposed by two leading democracies, France and Germany, among others. But Bush went ahead despite their strong objections.

Who cares what ANY other country thinks of how we do things. WE ARE AMERICA. WE ARE THE SUPERPOWER of the world. WE NEED NO PREMISSION FROM ANYONE for ANYTHING.

"It is wishful thinking that a league of democracies would any more readily approve U.S. military intervention in support of another U.S. president," Carothers said.

That's NOT the point. READ this again. "maintaining peace and limiting U.S. military intervention, such as the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq." LIMITING, NOT approving. Do not forget the whole GWBS aspect of this either.

And while "some people like Senator McCain imagine it might become a replacement for the U.N., that is not the initial intention," Carothers said in a telephone interview after the seminar.

No, it's going to be worse. MUCH worse.

Congratulations Sen. McCain. For proposing this New World Order, accepting the whole GWBS, and talking about giving our Sovereignty away, you ARE the Idiot of the Week. Be thankful Senator, that the only way you are going to win this thing is because you are NOT Clinton or Obama.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk - Many See McCain As A Liberal
AP - McCain proposal for joint action gains support