Follow by Email

Sunday, October 09, 2011

So Teaching Someone the Truth Is BAD?

If it may effect their Decision to do the right thing? I guess it IS bad.

Hey folks,

Are you looking at a health situation right now? Did someone tell you that you need Surgery? Have you looked into the FACTS and Options to this? I hope so. Are you looking to buy a Home? A Car? Have you looked into all the Facts and All the possible draw backs? Is it safe? Has the Car been flooded, in an accident? Is there alternatives? That may work better for you? Are you looking for a Job? Have you looked into all aspects? What is the Job description? Pay? ETC?

So when a Women becomes Pregnant, and then is contemplating making a decision to possibly Abort it, why is it WRONG for her to learn all the FACTS about what she is about to do? It's not. But it seems to be when it comes to the Liberal Pro-Death Libs. If it may effect their Decision to do the right thing? I guess it IS bad. Right?

According to AOL News - Michele Bachmann Proposes Mandatory Ultrasounds For Women Seeking Abortions


Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) proposed a bill on Thursday that would force women in the early stages of pregnancy to have a physically invasive and medically unnecessary ultrasound procedure before they can legally consent to having an abortion.
OK stop right there. Have you even HAD an Ultrasound? My Wife has had many. It is NOT invasive. You lift your shirt, have some cream rubbed on your belly, and a wand is moved over you. Big Deal. That's not invasive.


The "Heartbeat Informed Consent Act" requires doctors to make the fetal heartbeat visible and audible to the woman prior to the abortion procedure and to describe the ultrasound image to her in detail, even if she prefers not to hear about it. If the woman is between four and five weeks pregnant, the doctor has to perform a "transvaginal ultrasound" in order to hear the heartbeat, which involves a probe and can be physically uncomfortable for the woman.

"It's similar to a pelvic exam, which can come with discomfort for the woman, and it's invasive," said Dr. Nancy Stanwood, an obstetrician and board member of the health advocacy group Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health. "It's also medically unnecessary. Some politicians might see it as ideologically necessary, but it's medically unnecessary, so the government telling you that you need to have one sounds ridiculous on many levels."
OH. OK. Now I get it. But this is not the reason why they do not want it. Just hang on. I may surprise some of you. But this is not why they do not want it. They do not want it because it will show Women that it REALLY is a Baby. It's NOT a Medical Procedure. It is NOT some mole or something. It is a BABY. A Human Being. It may make them change their mind. Which is the whole point.


Bachmann says the bill is intended to coax women who are considering getting abortions into changing their minds and carrying their pregnancies to term.

“A study by Focus on the Family found that when women who were undecided about having an abortion were shown an ultrasound image of the baby, 78% chose life," she said in a statement.
Now it goes on to talk about this Doctor that makes a living out of Murdering Innocent Lives, A Dr. Stanwood, who performs multiple Abortions a week, says it won't matter. Blah, blah, blah. But here is where I may surprise some of you. I AGREE. There should NOT be some Law requiring this.

OK I know, I know. What? Right? I do not feel that the Government should be creating new Laws that hinder our Freedoms. I do feel that the Government had NO RIGHT whatsoever to make Abortion Legal. I think it should be overturned. I think Abortion is the Murder of an Innocent Life. I think if a Doctor, decided that this was a part of the Procedure before they provide the Aborting, then I'm all for it. I do not think the Government should tell that Doctor NO. But right now, Abortion IS Legal. So, in that case, I do not want Government Creating Laws to FORCE someone to go through a Medical Procedure that is not Medically Necessary.

I can hear some of you now. "Pete, does that mean that Government should not restrict Abortion? Do you think that the Parental Notification should be done away with?" NO! A Minor is a Minor. If they can not get their ear pierced without Parental Notification, then they can not have an Abortion. I'm not for anarchy. I do not think Abortions {Late Term} should be INCREASED by Law either. As long as they are Legal. I say the Government needs to stay out of it. Just like anything else. I do not think the Federal Government should be interfering in State Rights on this or anything else either.

Would I like Women to learn what they are about to do? Have all the facts? Hear the Heart Beat. See the Baby? YES. But Government creating a Law to do it? No. Who is going to pay for that? ETC. Until it is overturned, we have to deal with it as is. Sorry Michele, I get what you are trying to do. I really do. But we can not tell the Government they can not mandate Obamacare, then say they CAN require us to spend money on Medical Procedures that are not Medically Necessary.
Peter

Sources:
AOL News - Michele Bachmann Proposes Mandatory Ultrasounds For Women Seeking Abortions

No comments: