Follow by Email

Sunday, February 15, 2009

US Scientist Attempt To Defend the Scientific Indefensible

Sad to see Science has become nothing more than a tool to further the Liberal Agenda.

Hey folks,

OK. We are back. I have to comment on this. As you may or may not know, this is the anniversary of the whole Evolutionary movement. The "Celebration" of Darwin's Birth. Well, last week was. So a bunch of bought and paid for Scientists got together to "defend Darwin." The only problem is that Darwin is just completely wrong. His "Theory", does not even meet the Scientific Method. Nor can it answer the simplest of questions. It is actually Scientifically IMPOSSIBLE that we came about by accident.

But you would not know this to listen to these "Experts" in their field. However, I am willing to meet them half way. Here is what I mean. According to the AFP - US scientists defend Darwin from attacks on evolution

CHICAGO (AFP) – While the rest of the world feted the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth, US scientists were forced to defend the theory of evolution from a skeptical public and a concerted attack campaign.

Top researchers gathered in Chicago presented papers showing how evolution can be witnessed in everything from the genetic similarities between humans and Neanderthals to the way planets form and crows use tools to catch bugs.

THAT I agree with them on. There IS a natural evolution to life. There has been from the beginning. I have no problem with that as I have discussed countless times in the past.

"Evolution is not an idea. It's a fact," James McCarthy, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science said Thursday at the launch of a conference whose theme celebrated Darwin's work.

"It's impossible to deny evolution: the development of drug resistant microbes, pesticide resistant insects, there are abundant examples in ordinary life."

In the aspect of natural evolution, I agree with him. However, the difference and the problems that we will have is HOW it all began. But they are not willing to be open to the fact that Nothing from, nor to, nothing equals NOTHING. There had to be a first SOMETHING for all somethings to come from.

But the message has not gotten through to the US public.

Because the THEORY of Evilution removes ANY possibility of God whatsoever. I will ask you a question at the end of this. If you are honest with yourself, you will understand my point.

Just 40 percent of Americans say they believe in the theory of evolution, according to a Gallup poll published Wednesday.

And previous polls taken over the past decade have consistently found that between 44 and 47 percent believe God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years or so.

"It's a uniquely American problem," McCarthy said.

No it isn't. What a completely idiotic thing to say. Faithful people all around the globe, understand that the THEORY of Evilution is bogus. It is actually quit Scientifically impossible. It is NOT an American problem. Actually, it is not a problem at all.

Evolution is not well taught in US schools and many religious groups advocate a literal interpretation of the Bible.

One such group, which runs a 27 million dollar "Creation Museum" in Kentucky where animatronics dinosaurs frolic with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, is hosting a free conference this weekend refuting evolution.

There are many more working behind the scenes to challenge or limit the teaching of evolution in the classroom, said Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for Science Education.

"There has been a concerted effort by a pretty well funded movement to educate the public that evolution is weak science, and scientists are giving up on it and making the argument that you have to choose between evolution and religion," Scott told AFP.

Not really. You can and SHOULD believe in and teach BOTH. I have no problem with the big bang theory. God said, "Bang" there was life. {Smile} Evolution continued from that point on. But uh, we were never Monkeys. DNA PROVES that all life, Hot / Cold blooded, plants, people, cats, dogs, fish, ETC. could NOT have possibly came from the SAME single cell organism.

The vast anti-evolution movement has developed over the decades, but has been sharply drawn in the courts since the famous 1925 case when a young biology teacher, John Scopes, was put on trial for teaching evolutionary theory in Dayton, Tennessee.

It was not until 1968 that the Supreme Court struck down an Arkansas law making it a crime to teach evolution and ruled that it was unconstitutional to ban the teaching of evolution under the powers of the separation of religion and state.

THERE IS NO WALL OF SEPARATION. But that aside, I have no problem in teaching Evolution as long as you teach the TRUTH about how it all began. God. Teach both, or neither.

In 1987, the Supreme Court then ruled it was against the constitution to force creationism to be taught in schools, as that would be promoting religion in the state education system.

In the last decade, a number of attempts have been made to promote the teaching of "intelligent design" -- the contention that life is too complex to have originated without a creator -- as an alternative to evolution.

That theory has also been unable to pass the religious test in the courts, and so anti-evolutionists are instead trying to force teachers to allow for "criticism" of controversial science.

An "academic freedom" bill was passed in Louisiana last year and five other states are currently considering similar legislation, Scott said.

"The latest strategy is not to promote the frank teaching of intelligent design, but to sneak it in through the back door," she said in a telephone interview.

"In the biology business we'd call that adaptation - if nothing else evolves, the creationists do. They're always coming up with ways to subvert evolution."


{Laughing} Kind of like what you all do with Evilution and Global Warming. When something happens that you can not explain, you just change the theory.

I think I just found my Idiot of the Week. So let me ask you Dr. What do you think takes more faith to believe in. God, created all life and there then became a natural evolution. Or?

There was nothing. From this nothing, SOMETHING, just popped up. From this single cell something, came ALL things. Hot / Cold blooded, planets, people, cats, dogs, fish, ETC?

One, GOD, has not been proven false, and there is much evidence on a constant basis that what the Bible tells us is ACTUALLY TRUE. Two, A Theory that science actually PROVES is impossible? Which takes more faith to believe in?
Peter

Sources:
AFP - US scientists defend Darwin from attacks on evolution

No comments: