Another Useless Study Face to Face Better Than Email

Why did someone have to spend money on this?

Hey folks,

In today's Health and Science Segment, we will look at another useless Study. According to Time - Study: Face-to-Face Meetings Breed More Trust Than E-Mail Does By BELINDA LUSCOMBE Belinda Luscombe – Wed Jun 23, 3:10 pm ET

In an age of perpetual digital connectedness, why do people seem so disconnected? In a Duke University study, researchers found that from 1985 to 2004, the percentage of people who said there was no one with whom they discussed important matters tripled, to 25%; the same study found that overall, Americans had one-third fewer friends and confidants than they did two decades ago.

Another recent study, by researchers at the University of Michigan, found that college students today have significantly less empathy - the ability to understand and share the feelings of another - than students of generations past did. The reason, psychologists speculate, may have something to do with our increasing reliance on digital communication and other forms of new media.

Spending too much time Online can also lead to or at least contribute to Obesity.

It's possible that instead of fostering real friendships off-line, e-mail and social networking may take the place of them - and the distance inherent in screen-only interactions may breed feelings of isolation or a tendency to care less about other people. After all, if you don't feel like dealing with a friend's problem online, all you have to do is log off.

The problem is, as empathy wanes, so does trust. And without trust, you can't have a cohesive society. Consider the findings of a new study co-authored by Kevin Rockmann of George Mason University and Gregory Northcraft, a professor of executive leadership at the University of Illinois who specializes in workplace collaboration.

Northcraft says high-tech communications like e-mail and (to a lesser extent) videoconferencing - which are sometimes known as "lean communication" because they have fewer cues like eye contact and posture for people to rely on - strip away the personal interaction needed to breed trust. In a business setting - as in all other social relationships outside the workplace - trust is a necessary condition for effective cooperation within a group. "Technology has made us much more efficient but much less effective," said Northcraft in a statement. "Something is being gained, but something is being lost. The something gained is time, and the something lost is the quality of relationships. And quality of relationships matters."

Body language is big when meeting someone and attempting to form a relationship. It is most of the time in the subconscious that we start to trust, or not, another. We all send signals, unknowingly at most times, to the person we are talking to.

Not to mention the whole anonymity involved Online. That 13 or 14 year old girl, might actually be a 30 year old Male. That 65 year old Male, may be a 14 year old boy. A rich businessman may just be a kid playing around, or worse. Face to face? Kind of hard to be something you are clearly not.

In Rockmann and Northcraft's study, 200 students were divided into teams and asked to manage two complicated projects: one having to do with nuclear disarmament; the other, price fixing. Some groups communicated via e-mail, some via videoconference and others face to face. In the end, those who met in person showed the most trust and most effective cooperation; those using e-mail were the least able to work together and get the job done. (Let's hope they weren't the ones working on disarmament.)

{Laughing} How much did this thing cost?

Northcraft thinks this is because real-life meetings, during which participants can see how engaged their colleagues are, breed more trust. Over e-mail, meanwhile, confirmation of hard work gets lost, which tends to encourage mutual slacking off. "If I don't think you are taking a task seriously, then I won't either," Northcraft says. "And e-mail doesn't allow us to verify that you are taking it seriously."

So even if a colleague is working hard, his e-mail correspondent doesn't know it and is thus less likely to work hard himself. In the study, the groups who met by videoconference did better than the e-mailers, who tended to shirk their responsibilities - suggesting that visual cues are key for trust.

"We all know how inefficient meetings are, and we all know the limitations of e-mail," says Northcraft. "You have to have both." So despite the capacity for mobile communicating, he advises businesses to make sure employees get together often enough to "recharge" their relationships and develop enough trust to last during periods of lean communication.

The same is true of relationships with family and friends, Northcraft says. It's not enough to stay in touch by text or e-mail or Facebook. Now and then, alas, you have to pick up the phone or make a personal visit to Mom and Dad.

For employees, the bad news is that your daily deluge of e-mail isn't going away, and neither are those endless meetings. But the good news is that hard data on the benefits of face time may be enough to persuade HR to fund your trip to a regional office. Summer might be a good time to build some trust with those colleagues up in Maine.

I repeat, how much did this cost? Quick. Someone send me an Email. {Smile}
Peter

Sources:
Time - Study: Face-to-Face Meetings Breed More Trust Than E-Mail Does