It should be.
Hey folks,
Happy Tuesday to you. Time to check in From the Energy Front. Yes. The Science is settled. There is a Consensus. The debate is over. We are killing the planet, and YOU are evil.
Manipulation of evidence:
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.
Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.
Suppression of evidence:
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:
Next
time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat
the crap out of him. Very tempted.
Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):
……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….
And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.
“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”
These are from those pesky Private Emails form those claiming GW is anything more than BS. You know, the whole bases for Cap and Tax? The whole bases for the Government to come in and start regulating your life. The whole Bases for Al Gore to make more Millions, while YOU have to live in a tent and ride a bike to work. The whole bases for our President to give up our Sovereignty to the UN and join the One World Government. The whole bases of the new and growing Green Industry. IT'S A SCAM!!!
He folks, I do not have time to go over everything that I have told you for YEARS. The evidence is clear. THERE IS NO MAN-MADE GLOBAL WARMING!!! From the fact we haven't "Warmed" in over a decade, to the Polar Bears exploding in record numbers. From the fact the ICE is NOT melting and the sea is not rising, to the Caribou are mating in record numbers by the Alaskan Pipeline. From Al Gore using a clip from the Sci-Fi, "Day After Tomorrow" movie in his movie about man destroying the planet, to and including the fact, this is ALL MADE UP.
But those computer models? Garbage in, garbage out. I have talked about that as well. I could get a computer to tell us the probable out come of an Asteroid hitting San Fransisco, and it will seems dire. Problem is, THERE IS NOT ASTEROID! You get the point.
We have talked about how devastating Cap and Tax would be. The Poor and Middle Class will be hit the hardest. The Rich? They can afford to play the game and buy the scam that is Carbon Credits. YOU? You better get ready to chose if you will buy gas, or food.
Check the archives here. Just type in Global Warming, Climate Change, or GWBS, and you will see that EVERYTHING that I have been telling you for YEARS, including the Psychology of Brain Washing you into thinking "Green"
The new group is about to launch the most ambitious U.S. marketing campaign ever on climate change, at a cost of more than $100 million a year for three years, to focus on the urgency of the problem and solutions.
The need for a different approach is apparent, environmentalists say.
"We've come up against a brick wall with Americans," says Lee Bodner, executive director of ecoAmerica, an environmental group based in Washington, D.C. Despite Americans' widespread familiarity with global warming, "only a small group are changing their behavior."
There's little research on how to lower people's energy use, but early evidence suggests that many people will change if:
• They think others similar to themselves are jumping on the "green" bandwagon.
• They get frequent positive feedback for effort.
• They feel able to make a difference by taking concrete steps.
• They think their children will be harmed by global warming, or children encourage the family to lead a greener life.
They are telling you what they are doing.
This is the very definition of Scaryence. Scare Science. "Don't forget, if all else fails, the KIDS. Bring up the kids."
Though research about green behavior is sparse, there's strong evidence on what sparks behavior change in general. "We just haven't applied it to global warming the way we have to public health issues like smoking and cholesterol," says Douglas McKenzie-Mohr, environmental psychologist in Fredericton, Ontario.
Fact-jammed books — appeals often used by global warming activists — and terrifying threats about the future that don't offer solutions won't motivate many people and may even backfire, says Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale University Project on Climate Change. The more people are inundated with facts and figures, the more emotionally turned off many become, "and you have to have an emotional response — bad or good — to put a high priority on doing something."
They are not even trying to hide this anymore folks. He just SAID it. "and you have to have an emotional response — bad or good — to put a high priority on doing something."
Forget the SCIENCE, or in this case, the LACK of, make them FEEL. Unbelievable. The absolute arrogance of this.
So will this new revelation of the fact that these Idiots were Emailing each other on how to deceive the public and make them THINK that we are all going to die, going to be the nail in the Coffin of Cap and Tax? It SHOULD be. At the very least, more people are going to wake up.
Peter
Sources:
The UK Telegraph - Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?
OPNTalk- Chicken Little Crowd To Attempt To Brainwash More Americans
OPNTalk- GWBS
The thoughts and comments of the OPNTalk Blog, do not necessarily represent the thoughts and opinions of Fluwiki.com or Pathology.org. The views expressed here are MINE. I am in no way related to, nor do I speak for, anyone outside of the OPNTalk Blog. My opinions here, are, well always right {Smile} and you should agree with me. However, you have the freedom to disagree.
No comments:
Post a Comment