Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Traitors Reid and Pelosi Surrender Bill Coming

Hey folks,

Happy Tuesday to you. By the way, Remember I said yesterday that the media need to get out of Virginia Tech and let them heal. What do you think Virginia Tech just told them yesterday afternoon? {Smile} I hope they listen.

One of the big news stories today is the Traitors Reid and Pelosi Surrender Bill that will be going to the President to veto. Why this is big news today, I do not know. Nothing has changed. They want surrender, and Bush, the soldiers, and most Americans want victory. They wrote up their little pointless joke of a Bill, and he will veto it.

The Traitors released a statement yesterday. Here it is.

"The agreement reached between the House and the Senate rejects the President's failed policies in Iraq and his open-ended commitment to keep American troops there indefinitely and forges a new direction for a responsible end to the war.

If the President follows through on his veto threat, he will be the one who has failed to provide our troops and our veterans with the resources they need and it will be the President who has rejected the benchmarks he announced in January to measure success in Iraq. The bill ensures our troops are combat-ready before they are deployed to Iraq, provides our troops the resources and health care they deserve in Iraq and here at home, and responsibly winds down this war.

Iraqis must take the tough and necessary steps to secure their nation and to forge political reconciliation. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates understands the value of timelines in motivating the Iraqi Government to accomplish these goals. The President should carefully consider the views of his Secretary of Defense in making a judgment on this legislation.

An overwhelming majority of Americans, bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress, military experts and the Iraq Study Group believe that a responsible end to the war best advances our national security needs. It is now up to the President to make a decision: continue to stay his failed course or join us to give our troops a strategy for success."

I do not even know where to begin. First, I guess, this whole thing is lies. We are in a war to win. Traitor Reid already came out and said, "The war is lost." This statement opens with

"The agreement reached between the House and the Senate rejects the President's failed policies in Iraq and his open-ended commitment to keep American troops there indefinitely and forges a new direction for a responsible end to the war."

The policy has NOT failed yet. The surge is working. Two, the President is NOT going to keep them there indefinitely. We have a set time line. We WILL leave when the job it done. They are simply using language that is designed to stir up the anti-war crowd. Of course noone wants to be in a losing battle. Nor does anyone want our troops there forever. But that is what they want you to believe is the Presidents plan.

"If the President follows through on his veto threat, he will be the one who has failed to provide our troops and our veterans with the resources they need and it will be the President who has rejected the benchmarks he announced in January to measure success in Iraq."

No he will not be. YOU will be Traitors. It is YOU playing politics with our troops lives. It is YOU Traitors, that have written this surrender Bill knowing full well that ANY President in history, including Bill Clinton, would have to veto it. You Traitors, want to surrender to the enemy. Tell the enemy when this will happen. You are the ones that will be denying the troops what they need. Just because YOU want to surrender and lose the war, doesn’t mean we WILL. YOU are not the Commander and Chief. You, thankfully, do not speak for most Americans. No matter how many times you lie about that, doesn’t make it true.

"The bill ensures our troops are combat-ready before they are deployed to Iraq, provides our troops the resources and health care they deserve in Iraq and here at home, and responsibly winds down this war."

No it doesn’t, because you wrote it TO be vetoed.

"Iraqis must take the tough and necessary steps to secure their nation and to forge political reconciliation. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates understands the value of timelines in motivating the Iraqi Government to accomplish these goals. The President should carefully consider the views of his Secretary of Defense in making a judgment on this legislation."

President Bush has already said this. He did give them benchmarks to reach, they are working on the together with the Iraqi Government. As for Secretary of Defense Robert Gates who will be in town soon, YOU have refused to even meet with him. Why? Why would you refuse to meet with him. Afraid he will go on record and say we are winning? Of course you cowards will not meet with him. You do not even like the man, but you will use him to attack Bush. The problem is though, he is NOT on your side on this. He KNOWS and will SPEAK the truth. Since that goes against your templet, you have no time for him. Amazing.

"An overwhelming majority of Americans, bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress, military experts and the Iraq Study Group believe that a responsible end to the war best advances our national security needs."

You are showing your ignorance again. You do NOT care about national security. If we leave. Stop fighting EVIL. EVIL will consider that, and rightfully so, a victory. They will simply take over there, get bigger, stronger, and come home with us later. You Idiots. You can not see that? Or, as I assess, you do not care about tomorrow, all you care about is getting Bush today.

"It is now up to the President to make a decision: continue to stay his failed course or join us to give our troops a strategy for success."

WHAT IS YOU STRATEGY FOR SUCCESS?

Folks they TRULY believe that if we surrender to the enemy, who they do not even see as an enemy, their enemy is Bush, and just leave them be, they will leave us be. They truly believe that they are so intelligent and so savvy that all they have to do is talk to those that want us dead just because we breath, and all will be well. They will simply fall in love with us and we will be friends.

Traitor Reid gave a speech yesterday at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. I have it, but when I printed it out, it is seven pages long. Pretty much all the same old garbage. I’ve read it again and again. It’s not even really worthy of comment. Just more garbage from a pointless and do nothing Congress.

I do love this part though. For those who say, well they will not abandon Iraq. One, if we leave, we ARE. How do we ensure that the enemy does NOT come in a take over, if we are not there? Morons. But Reid stated, he doesn’t even want our attention THERE. He said, which you KNOW is a lie as soon as you hear this.

We should be addressing a nuclear Iran.

And we should be addressing the resurgence of al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

And we should be addressing the instability and genocide in Africa.

And we should be addressing democratic retrenchment in Russia.

And we should be addressing anti-Americanism in Latin America.

These challenges require American leadership and they will determine our future in the world.

As conditions deteriorate in Iraq and our world focus continues to narrow, we must choose a new direction.

One road leads to endless war, with consequences for America's future security extending well past the borders of Iraq. The other road leads to a responsible end, gives Iraq the best chance for success and allows us to refocus on the challenges we face throughout the world.

Iran? Russia? Latin America? So what is Reid saying? We need our troops to be ready for these countries? No folks, he doesn’t care about any of that. All he cares about is losing the war. All he cares about is getting Bush. He like Pelosi, are idiots and Traitors. The President is right to veto their Bill of surrender. They should not even be in power to write such Bills. But until someone grows brave enough to step up and call for it, they will continue.
Peter

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

One fact that is never discussed is that since 911 terrorist attacks have been 0

Peter said...

Hey Doug,

Thanks again for the gift. Will let you know soon.

Yes This is one of the points they stay away from. It's fact, no matter how they try to spin it. Clinton? 9 attacks. Bush 1. Then we said enough. Like you said, 0 after that.

This is one of the biggest problems with what the LWL are doing now. They want to go back to the whole "we get attacked and do nothing" policy. That just invites more attacks. They are either too ignorant or just do not care to understand that.

As you probably saw, I just sent a letter to the President to get his thoughts. I guess we will see if we get anything back.

Talk to you soon my friend.
Peter