The Attack Machine, New Target
Hey folks,
Well, the House passed their version, today the Senate will, then perhaps as early as tomorrow, the President will veto it. Maybe we will then get the funding that the troops most definitely need. But then again, you have to think about this. Right now, the LWL {Left Wing Looneys} think that if they just keep dragging this out, they are really not trying to withhold funds, it is the President that is delaying them. Right? WRONG. But this is their way of attempting to say "Hey, if we did not care about the troops we would have just come right out and de-fund the war. We are not doing that. We are doing our part. It is the President that will not approve the funds. Not us." these people are pathetic.
But the attack machine has a new target. Republican Rudolph Giuliani. There is a good reason for this that I will point out in a second. The do not like this guy, and Soros is starting to unleash the drones {Mass Media} against him.
Do I really like Giuliani? Yes. Do I agree with some of his social views. Most definitely NOT. Would I vote for him? To early to tell. But if you look at this and other stories like this, you would think it’s all about this comment. It’s not. But up first, Reuters -Democrats fire back at Giuliani on 9/11 warning
Democratic White House contenders Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized Republican Rudolph Giuliani on Wednesday for suggesting a Democratic president would put the United States at risk of another September 11-type terrorist attack.
The former New York mayor, who leads the 2008 Republican White House race in national polls, said in a speech in New Hampshire on Tuesday night the United States would be safer and fight terrorism more aggressively under a Republican president.
So they are mad at him telling the truth. Nothing he said is NOT true. They are calling for America’s surrender in the middle of a war. Their policies FAILED. Clinton did nothing attack after attack, gave North Korea the means and the fuel to create nuclear weapons, which they did, and "talked to people." This is what they think we should go back to. Since 9-11, NO attacks. And other than some rhetoric, no new nuclear weapons. YET.
A Democratic president, he said, would "wave the white flag on Iraq" and take the United States "back to our pre-September 11 attitude of defense," the Politico.com quoted Giuliani as saying.
While the United States ultimately will prevail in the fight against terror, he said, "the question is how long will it take and how many casualties will we have? If we are on defense, we will have more losses and it will go on longer."
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.
Obama and Clinton said Americans had moved beyond Republican rhetoric about September 11.
{Laughing} They want you to FORGET 9-11 happened at all. They really do.
"Rudy Giuliani today has taken the politics of fear to a new low and I believe Americans are ready to reject those kind of politics," Obama, an Illinois senator, said in a statement.
"The threat we face is real, and deserves better than to be the punch line of another political attack," he said.
Clinton, a New York senator, said the last six years of the Bush administration have showed "political rhetoric won't do anything to quell those threats. And that America is ready for a change."
Uh, I repeat, ZERO attacks since.
"We have to protect our country from terrorism -- it shouldn't be a Democratic fight or a Republican fight," she said in a statement.
YOU made it that you twit. You and your party have made it political. You and your party fail to support the troops. You and your party attack the Commander and Chief at all turns in the middle of this war. YOU and your party say the war is lost. YOU have made it a political fight. {Sigh} These people really are either too ignorant of too arrogant to run this country.
But this is not the main reason that the attack machine had set it’s sites on Rudy. Not even is it the fact he leads the Republican wave of candidates. But it is THIS poll, and ones like it, that has gotten their attention. Remember, they LIVE for and even govern by polls. They HAVE to be popular. Rasmussen Reports -Election 2008: Giuliani (R) 46% Obama (D) 43%
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) clinging to a narrow lead over Illinois Senator Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) (D) in an early 2008 Presidential trial heat. Obama, however, enjoys a ten-point lead over former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson ®.
Giuliani, the GOP frontrunner, leads Obama 46% to 43%. A month ago, Giuliani led the Illinois Senator by just a single point. Back-to-back months in toss-up status represents a significant improvement for Obama--in December he trailed Giuliani by 11.
Since last month, Obama has slightly increased his advantage with women. He now leads by 11 points among that group. But Giuliani's advantage with men has meanwhile increased to 20 points. Obama enjoys a 14-point edge with unaffiliated voters in the current poll, but loses a fourth of Democrats to Giuliani.
"But loses a fourth of Democrats to Giuliani."
That’s NOT good for them. Look for the increase in attacks on Giuliani. Remember. It was the MMD {Mass media Drones} that got the LWL in power. Not they, themselves. They ran on nothing. The MMD are trying it again for 08. Hillary is not even mentioned in this. {Smile}
Yes folks, there is a new target in town. His name is Rudy. I can only hope he doesn’t back down now. This should be interesting to watch.
Peter
Sources:
Reuters -Democrats fire back at Giuliani on 9/11 warning
Rasmussen Reports -Election 2008: Giuliani (R) 46% Obama (D) 43%
Hey folks,
Well, the House passed their version, today the Senate will, then perhaps as early as tomorrow, the President will veto it. Maybe we will then get the funding that the troops most definitely need. But then again, you have to think about this. Right now, the LWL {Left Wing Looneys} think that if they just keep dragging this out, they are really not trying to withhold funds, it is the President that is delaying them. Right? WRONG. But this is their way of attempting to say "Hey, if we did not care about the troops we would have just come right out and de-fund the war. We are not doing that. We are doing our part. It is the President that will not approve the funds. Not us." these people are pathetic.
But the attack machine has a new target. Republican Rudolph Giuliani. There is a good reason for this that I will point out in a second. The do not like this guy, and Soros is starting to unleash the drones {Mass Media} against him.Do I really like Giuliani? Yes. Do I agree with some of his social views. Most definitely NOT. Would I vote for him? To early to tell. But if you look at this and other stories like this, you would think it’s all about this comment. It’s not. But up first, Reuters -Democrats fire back at Giuliani on 9/11 warning
Democratic White House contenders Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton criticized Republican Rudolph Giuliani on Wednesday for suggesting a Democratic president would put the United States at risk of another September 11-type terrorist attack.
The former New York mayor, who leads the 2008 Republican White House race in national polls, said in a speech in New Hampshire on Tuesday night the United States would be safer and fight terrorism more aggressively under a Republican president.
So they are mad at him telling the truth. Nothing he said is NOT true. They are calling for America’s surrender in the middle of a war. Their policies FAILED. Clinton did nothing attack after attack, gave North Korea the means and the fuel to create nuclear weapons, which they did, and "talked to people." This is what they think we should go back to. Since 9-11, NO attacks. And other than some rhetoric, no new nuclear weapons. YET.
A Democratic president, he said, would "wave the white flag on Iraq" and take the United States "back to our pre-September 11 attitude of defense," the Politico.com quoted Giuliani as saying.
While the United States ultimately will prevail in the fight against terror, he said, "the question is how long will it take and how many casualties will we have? If we are on defense, we will have more losses and it will go on longer."
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.
Obama and Clinton said Americans had moved beyond Republican rhetoric about September 11.
{Laughing} They want you to FORGET 9-11 happened at all. They really do.
"Rudy Giuliani today has taken the politics of fear to a new low and I believe Americans are ready to reject those kind of politics," Obama, an Illinois senator, said in a statement.
"The threat we face is real, and deserves better than to be the punch line of another political attack," he said.
Clinton, a New York senator, said the last six years of the Bush administration have showed "political rhetoric won't do anything to quell those threats. And that America is ready for a change."
Uh, I repeat, ZERO attacks since.
"We have to protect our country from terrorism -- it shouldn't be a Democratic fight or a Republican fight," she said in a statement.
YOU made it that you twit. You and your party have made it political. You and your party fail to support the troops. You and your party attack the Commander and Chief at all turns in the middle of this war. YOU and your party say the war is lost. YOU have made it a political fight. {Sigh} These people really are either too ignorant of too arrogant to run this country.
But this is not the main reason that the attack machine had set it’s sites on Rudy. Not even is it the fact he leads the Republican wave of candidates. But it is THIS poll, and ones like it, that has gotten their attention. Remember, they LIVE for and even govern by polls. They HAVE to be popular. Rasmussen Reports -Election 2008: Giuliani (R) 46% Obama (D) 43%
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) clinging to a narrow lead over Illinois Senator Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record) (D) in an early 2008 Presidential trial heat. Obama, however, enjoys a ten-point lead over former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson ®.
Giuliani, the GOP frontrunner, leads Obama 46% to 43%. A month ago, Giuliani led the Illinois Senator by just a single point. Back-to-back months in toss-up status represents a significant improvement for Obama--in December he trailed Giuliani by 11.
Since last month, Obama has slightly increased his advantage with women. He now leads by 11 points among that group. But Giuliani's advantage with men has meanwhile increased to 20 points. Obama enjoys a 14-point edge with unaffiliated voters in the current poll, but loses a fourth of Democrats to Giuliani.
"But loses a fourth of Democrats to Giuliani."
That’s NOT good for them. Look for the increase in attacks on Giuliani. Remember. It was the MMD {Mass media Drones} that got the LWL in power. Not they, themselves. They ran on nothing. The MMD are trying it again for 08. Hillary is not even mentioned in this. {Smile}
Yes folks, there is a new target in town. His name is Rudy. I can only hope he doesn’t back down now. This should be interesting to watch.
Peter
Sources:
Reuters -Democrats fire back at Giuliani on 9/11 warning
Rasmussen Reports -Election 2008: Giuliani (R) 46% Obama (D) 43%
No comments:
Post a Comment