The IAEA is Iran’s Patsies
How about a two for Thursday. I found some extra time today so here you go. I just caught this AP article
"A recent House of Representatives committee report on Iran's nuclear capability is "outrageous and dishonest" in trying to make a case that Tehran's program is geared toward making weapons, a senior official of the U.N. nuclear watchdog has said.
The letter, obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday outside a 35-nation board meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency, says the report is false in saying Iran is making weapons-grade uranium at an experimental enrichment site, when it has in fact produced material only in small quantities that is far below the level that can be used in nuclear arms."
This is going to be all over the place tomorrow folks. The LWL will be attacking the Republicans and Bush for lying, playing politics, and creating another Iraq. I can hear them now. "You can fool us once Mr. President. But you cannot fool us again. Iran is NO threat. We will not allow you to do the same to Iran, as you did to Iraq." Three guesses who you think will be saying these things. It must be true. The UN said so.
"The letter, which was first reported on by The Washington Post, also says the report erroneously says that IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei removed a senior nuclear inspector from the team investigating Iran's nuclear program "for concluding that the purpose of Iran's nuclear program is to construct weapons."
In fact, the inspector was sidelined on Tehran's request, and the Islamic republic had a right to ask for a replacement under agreements that govern all states relationships with the agency, said the letter, calling the report's version "incorrect and misleading."
"In addition," says the letter, "the report contains an outrageous and dishonest suggestion that such removal might have been for 'not having adhered to an unstated IAEA policy barring IAEA officials from telling the whole truth about the Iranian nuclear program.'"
OK. So why are the inspectors not allowed to inspect? Well according to Jamal Ware, a spokesman for the House committee,
"All IAEA complains about is a photo caption. If you read the report, it's very clear that what it is saying is that Iran is working to develop the capability to enrich uranium to weapons grade, not that they have done so," Ware said. "They use a string of adjectives, while not pointing to any substantive criticism of the report. There are areas where we would disagree with them. A disagreement does not make what we say erroneous."
YES it does. If you dis-agree with "Little Hitler" and anyone else that hates Bush, you are wrong. According to them. The appeasement is mind boggling folks. But if you do not believe me, just read the last two paragraphs of this article.
"The dispute was reminiscent of the clashes between the IAEA and Washington over whether Saddam Hussein was trying to make weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear arms. American arguments that Saddam had such covert arms programs were given as the chief reason for invading Iraq and toppling Saddam.
ElBaradei's criticism of the U.S. standpoint on Iraq and subsequent perceptions that he was soft on Iran in his staff's investigation of suspicions Tehran's nuclear activities may be a cover for a weapons program led to a failed attempt last year by Washington to prevent his re-election."
Absolutely my point. ElBaradei hates Bush. He hates America. He would block any real attempts by our government to protect itself, because he WANTS us to fail. He shielded Saddam. He is attempting to shield "Little Hitler". He is protecting one that openly says he wants Israel wiped off the map. He wants us dead. He would give up halve his own country to make it happen. But a report that tells the truth about a threat against us is "outrageous and dishonest".
No condemnation of Iraq. No condemnation of Iran. No problem with sick and twisted terrorists. WE are the ones that are wrong. OK Mr. ElBaradei, you can go away now. You are as useless as the UN.