AP Says Winning Iraq War Is Bad For Democrats

Hey folks,

Happy Tuesday to you. Yup, you read the headline correctly. This is something I have been telling you for over a year now. The Democrats are so invested in defeat in Iraq, that they cannot survive politically if we win.

They have done so many things to try to force the President to surrender, that they can no longer shift their position and take part in ANY KIND of victory. From traveling the world, attempting to create their own foreign policy, trying to force withdraw, to delaying funding, and all the political shows, they have done ANY and EVERY thing they can to cause us to lose the war. This is strictly for political gain. They want to blame Bush for the loss.

But there is only one problem. We are WINNING. They KEEP repeating old, outdated, and proven wrong talking points, while more and more Americans are learning the truth. Get this, from the AP -Poll: More in US see progress in Iraq

By ALAN FRAM, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 1 minute ago

Growing numbers of people think the U.S. is making progress in Iraq and will eventually be able to claim some success there, a poll showed Tuesday in a sign the politics of the war could become more complicated for Democrats.

STOP! {Laughing} Translation folks, We are winning. Good for America. BAD for Democrats.

With diminishing U.S. and Iraqi casualties and the start of modest troop withdrawals, the public's mood seems to have brightened a bit, the Associated Press-Ipsos poll showed. That is a rarity in what has been a relentlessly unpopular war.

WHY has it been unpopular? Because the Mass Media Drones, simply repeating what they have been told to, a constant bombardment of bad news on a daily bases? Maybe it could be the faked pictures, phony stories, or the leaders in the Senate saying the war is lost? Could it be that the change is because the American people are starting to learn the truth? Even Murtha himself just came back from Iraq and said "The surge is working." In which case he had to "Clarify" his remarks later, after being slapped by Pelosi and the Lunatic base. The LWL.

"I still have hopes the people in Iraq will appreciate us being there," said Daniel Laird, 30, a firefighter from Yuba City, Calif., who leans Republican and was questioned in the survey. "It just seems like we are making a difference."

They DO appreciate us being there. They DO want us there. Regardless of what you have heard Mr. Laird.

Even so, majorities remain upset about the conflict and convinced the invasion was a mistake, and the issue still splits the country deeply along party lines.

Yup, the Sheeple, and those that can think for themselves.

About three-fourths of respondents describe themselves as worried about what's happening in Iraq and nearly six in 10 say they are angry — slight reductions since February, but still strong majorities harboring negative feelings on the eve of an election year. Most Democrats and independents — joined by sizable numbers of Republicans — say they are worried, tired, even angry.

I am also. We could have won this, and been done with this, a long time ago, if we did not have one major political party calling for defeat. If we did not have a Liberal controlled media, blindly reporting what they are told to. If some in Congress were not telling the American people that our troops are dumb hicks, harassing innocent women and children in the dead of night, killing innocent civilians in cold blood, and that there is not way to win. All ABSOLUTLEY and UTTERLY opposite of reality and truth.

People are most positive are about recent gains in security in Iraq.

Amazing when they learn the truth, they change their mind. I though the "surge failed." "It can never work." ETC.

The poll showed a nearly even division over whether President Bush's troop increase this year has helped stabilize the country, with 50 percent saying no and 47 percent yes. Just three months ago, only 36 percent said yes.

By 52 percent to 41 percent, most said the U.S. is making progress in Iraq. When AP-Ipsos last asked that question in September 2006 — a time when vicious sectarian attacks resembled a civil war — just 39 percent saw improvements under way.

Oh? Like the President and commonsense said, it takes time?

While far greater proportions of Republicans than Democrats think progress is being made, even growing numbers of Democrats agree. The portion of Democrats saying the troop increase has helped stabilize the country has nearly doubled since September to 26 percent, and the number saying the U.S. is making progress has shown similar growth.

For many Democrats, though, the gains are seen as tentative.

"Yes, there's been progress, but I don't think it will be long-term," said Regina Pitts, 51, a Democrat from Fairview, Tenn. "We can't stay there forever and babysit."

STRAIGHT from the LWL talking points. Like I said, Sheeple.

By some measures, peoples' longer-range views of U.S. accomplishments are also becoming more optimistic.

Forty-two percent said they think history will consider the war mostly a success. While more — 55 percent — said they think it will be judged a failure, those numbers were rosier than in September when 59 percent said they felt that way.

Just one in five Democrats and four in 10 independents think the war will be a long-range success, well less than the three-fourths of Republicans who think so.

Overall, only 38 percent think the 2003 invasion was the right decision, including three-fourths of Republicans, a third of independents and one-seventh of Democrats — a negative perspective that has barely shifted all year.

Even so, the slowly improving views about progress raise the question of whether Iraq will give Democrats the slam-dunk political advantage in next year's presidential election that many in the party have long assumed it will.

It will not. The EXACT opposite actually. This is why they and the mainstream media are shifting focus AWAY from Iraq. But do not worry, they will still report any BAD news that may pop up.

Democratic voters are still strongly against the war and the party's presidential candidates compete for ways to criticize it. Such a tactic, though, might prove less effective when it is time to appeal to the more moderate voters who will participate in next year's general election.

Nah. Just pull a Hillary. Change you position so many times, NO ONE will know where you actually stand on it. Just change with the polls. You will see them saying more positive things now about Iraq in light of this latest poll. It is NOT good for them at all.

So far, the public's improved mood has helped Bush — slightly.

Thirty-six percent now approve of the overall job he is doing — up four percentage points from last month, but still a poor showing for a president. Eight in 10 Republicans, three in 10 independents and one in 10 Democrats approve. His highest marks — 42 percent approval — are for handling foreign policy and terrorism.

Congress' approval remains mired at 25 percent — near its January low of 22 percent.

Bush sent 30,000 additional troops to Iraq this year, with most focused on reducing violence in and around Baghdad. U.S. forces in the country exceed 160,000, though Pentagon officials have said that figure could decline to 135,000 next summer — about where it was before the troop increase.

Besides the beefed up U.S. presence, the leader of the Mahdi Army militia, Muqtada al-Sadr, has ordered his fighters to temporarily stand down. And thousands of Iraqis, chiefly Sunni Arabs, have become U.S. allies in the fight against al-Qaida in Iraq.

As a result, violence has dropped considerably since June and there have been signs that Baghdad is becoming less chaotic. U.S. casualties have fallen from 101 in June to 37 in November, according to an AP count, and Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in the country, says there has been a 60 percent decline in violence over the past half year.

Among Iraqi civilians, the number of deaths from war-related violence have dropped from 1,640 in June to 718 last month, according to the AP.

The poll involved telephone interviews with 1,009 adults conducted from Dec. 3-5. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

This is why the Congress will be giving President Bush the additional funding he asked for with NO strings attached. They HAVE to. If they do not, these numbers will continue to go up, and they will continue to be seen as failing to support the troops in a time of war. Bad for Democrats, GOOD for America.
Peter