Confused Yet?


Hey folks,

I agree, and love his style. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said yesterday that critics should "just back off" on demands for deadlines in Iraq. He said,

"You're looking for some sort of a guillotine to come falling down if some date isn't met. That is not what this is about. They've been discussing the way forward through the rest of this year and next year. As they do that, they then discuss, 'Well, when might something happen?' And it isn't a date. And it isn't a penalty if it doesn't happen.

"You ought to just back off, take a look at it, relax, understand that it's complicated, it's difficult Honorable people are working on these things together. There isn't any daylight between them."

This is a brand new democratic government. They are trying to get going. I understand this. I believe that when you give facts, most Americans understand this as well. The problem comes from when the LWL demands a deadline. But when you ask THEM what they would do, they say things like, "We would handle it differently. Smarter. ETC." But they never tell you HOW.

Then yesterday, President Bush signed into law for the fence to be built on the Mexican boarder. Of course the MMD reports it this way,

"President Bush wanted an exchange of workers with Mexico to bring order to the border, but wound up signing a law Thursday that approves partitioning 700 miles of the United States from its southern neighbor.

The administration once talked of "orderly migration" — workers entering the United States and returning to Mexico or other countries when their jobs were finished. But political realities have replaced phrases like that with "border security" and plans for fences, surveillance cameras, unmanned aerial vehicles and watch towers.

Bush still wants a guest-worker program. But the toughest resistance to that idea has come from his own Republican Party — and has intensified as the midterm elections have drawn near."

Now if you read this, it sound like he was forced to sign it. He actually WAS. By YOU. That’s right folks, you, and the house Republicans made so much noise, and complained so loudly, that the President had to act. If it were not for YOU and the House Republicans, we could be looking at mass amnesty right now. Keep that in mind by the way.

As far as the NJ? The Rasmussen Reports says,

"The New Jersey Supreme Court made news yesterday when it handed down a significant ruling in the ongoing debate over same-sex marriage. While the court's 4-3 decision moved New Jersey closer to the handful of states that legalize same-sex unions, a recent Rasmussen Reports survey finds that 54% of New Jersey voters believe marriage is defined as the union of a man and a woman only."

However,

"While the majority of Garden State voters support the traditional definition of marriage, the state also has a relatively high percentage of those who see marriage as the union of any two people (42%). Massachusetts tops that list (51%) followed by Vermont (49%); Rhode Island and Hawaii (45%); and New York (44%)."

Then you have THIS one from the AFP,

"An Al-Qaeda terror suspect captured by the United States, who gave evidence of links between Iraq and the terror network, confessed after being tortured, a journalist told the BBC.

Iban al Shakh al Libby told intelligence agents that he was close to Al-Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri and "understood an awful lot about the inner workings of Al-Qaeda," former FBI agent Jack Clonan told the broadcaster.

Libby was tortured in an Egyptian prison, according to Stephen Grey, the author of the newly-released book "Ghost Plane" who investigated the secret US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) prisons that housed terror suspects around the world.

US President George W. Bush confirmed the existence of the network of CIA holding facilities overseas during a September 6 speech defending controversial US interrogation practices."

11 days to go. "Just released book" THIS story about torture, doubtful link because of torture, Bush coverup. This one story has ALL the elements. All the LWL talking points. You do not even need ME to break this one down for you. Just ask yourself the honest questions you get when you read the story. Like, "If Iban al Shakh al Libby told intelligence agents that he was close to Al-Qaeda leaders Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri and "understood an awful lot about the inner workings of Al-Qaeda," would that not make him a terrorist? Forget the suspected part.

"What he claimed most significantly was a connection between ... Al-Qaeda and the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein. This intelligence report made it all the way to the top, and was used by (former US secretary of state) Colin Powell as a key piece of justification ... for invading Iraq," he told the broadcaster."

WAIT!! Read that again. Sounds official right? This is a REPORTER talking to a BROADCASTER with no evidence as to what he is saying is correct. But they want you to believe this. Actually folks, they do not really care if you do or not. It is merely yet another distraction. More on that later.

I’m out of time right now. Consider this part one. I’ll be back later for part two. I have to answer some questions. Do not worry, in the end it will all make sense. This is why I am your voice of simplicity in a complicated world. Your voice of logic and reason in the insanity that surrounds us. Your gateway to the truth.

See you a little bit later for part two. 11 days and counting. Get informed. Get ready. Go vote.
Peter

Sources:
Newmax
AP- "Bush signs U.S.-Mexico border fence bill"
Rasmussen Report "Poll: 54% of New Jersey voters support traditional marriage"
AFP- "Confession that formed base of Iraq war was acquired under torture: journalist"