Friday, June 12, 2009

Iran Elections, From The Emails 061209

Is the Press attempting to alter Iran's Elections?

Hey folks,

Sure sounds like it. Times Online seems to be following the Iranian Elections pretty close. Like I told you yesterday, it sounds as if the Media was talking about OUR elections. We all know how they got Obama Elected. In this case though, I hope that they succeed.

Like yesterday, the Media seems to be attempting to alter Iran's Election outcome. They are talking about issues like rigged Elections, intimidation, all the way up to riots in the streets if the one they picked does not win. Look at this from today by Times Online

“Presently they have prevented some of our representatives from being present at polling stations and they do not let us monitor (the vote),” he said. “We expect that officials would solve this problem as soon as possible.”

Mr Mousavi's allies went even further, claiming that Mr Ahmadinejad could win only by cheating and warning that this could spark riots and chaos on the streets. One political analyst said that he feared a "Tienanmen Square-style experience", with the military moving in to crush any protests.

Even Times Online admits in this piece that it is almost a guarantee that Ahmadinejad is reelected. But there are "signs" that he may be in for a challenge, because of those they have seen protesting. But they have no real FACTS to back it up. It is as if they want to CREATE the illusion that there is "Hope" that Little Hitler will lose today. There is not.

Anyway, Happy Friday to you. Since it is Friday, it's time to go to the Emails. The Sender added this message.

"Your going to love this Pete."

And I DO!! {Laughing}

This is from the Washington Times. Now this is from back on, what was it? Here it is. Back on Thursday, May 21, 2009. Why did you wait so long to send it to me? But it doesn't matter when. It's by John McCaslin. I guess it is a running compilation of different things going on in Politics called "Inside The Beltway."

They start off with a story of how the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis are being told in writing to leave at home or in their vehicles all "ceremonial swords" and anything else "that might be considered a weapon or a threat by screeners." which included Umbrellas. Because the Almighty Obama was to be there. {Sigh} Don't they normally GRADUATE with the Swords? I don't know. But this is not the thing I love. THIS is.

SURREAL DELUSION

This is where John McCaslin talks about Ron Paul. Remember him? I liked him. I did not agree with his stance on the War and a few other things, but he was on the right track at least. Talk about people WAKING UP to see who and what Obama really is? Even John McCaslin could not believe what Ron Paul said.

Wow - what adjectives, adverbs and nouns did 2008 presidential candidate and Congressman Ron Paul of Texas not resort to when recalling a horrific vision he experienced this week?

"Could it all be a bad dream, or a nightmare?" Mr. Paul wondered. "Is it my imagination, or have we lost our minds? It's surreal; it's just not believable. A grand absurdity; a great deception; a delusion of momentous proportions, based on preposterous notions and on ideas whose time should never have come; simplicity grossly distorted and complicated; insanity passed off as logic; grandiose schemes built on falsehoods with the morality of Ponzi and Madoff; evil described as virtue; ignorance pawned off as wisdom; destruction and impoverishment in the name of humanitarianism; violence, the tool of change; preventive wars used as the road to peace; tolerance delivered by government guns; reactionary views in the guise of progress; an empire replacing the republic; slavery sold as liberty; excellence and virtue traded for mediocrity; socialism to save capitalism; a government out of control, unrestrained by the Constitution, the rule of law, or morality; bickering over petty politics as we collapse into chaos; the philosophy that destroys us is not even defined."

Is this where you woke up, sir?

"We have broken from reality," he continued. "A psychotic nation. Ignorance with a pretense of knowledge replacing wisdom. Money does not grow on trees, nor does prosperity come from a government printing press or escalating deficits. We're now in the midst of unlimited spending of the people's money, exorbitant taxation, deficits of trillions of dollars spent on a failed welfare/warfare state; an epidemic of cronyism; unlimited supplies of paper money equated with wealth ...

"Of course, it could all be a bad dream, a nightmare, and that I'm seriously mistaken, overreacting, and that my worries are unfounded. I hope so. But just in case, we ought to prepare ourselves for revolutionary changes in the not-too-distant future."


LINK: Washington Times - Inside the Beltway

{Laughing} Why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel Mr. Paul? Actually folks. He is RIGHT! One hundred percent RIGHT! Except one little detail. It's NOT a Nightmare. It IS Obama.
Peter

Sources:
Times Online - Ahmadinejad challenger demands access to polls as Iran election gets under way

Note: "From The Emails" is a weekly segment in the Friday edition of the OPNtalk Blog. If you care to send in News Articles, Comments, Stories, or anything else you may wish to share, please feel free to send it to opntalk@aim.com As always, you never know what you are going to see here.

2 comments:

D.S.Harford said...

I was never a Ron Paul fan, although he was and is better than most on the hill. He presented himself as some kind of Libertarian
with sort of Conservative values; then through his support to the Constitution Party (can't remember the clowns name at the moment), a party that believes in controlling everything by the (A) christian church. Then we could have our own Pope. I respect his opinions, I just wish that he would stop being protrayed as a Libertarian, which he ain't.

Peter said...

Hey D.S.

Yeah I wasn't either. He made some good points, but I did disagree with him on many things.

However, This latest statement I agree with ONE HUNDRED percent. I think I would much rather give him a chance than what we have now.
Peter