So Naive it is dangerous.
Hey folks,
Yes Guy {Guy Harrison NRCC Executive Director} I saw this. I have been watching Little Hitler's {Mahmoud Ahmadinejad} rise to power, and his quest for Nuclear weapons for years. I understand the threat. Guy said this.
"I needed to make sure you saw this.
Iran as a nuclear power. Does that sound appealing to you? Because it does to President Obama, who, according to The Washington Post, believes that a country flush with oil, '…has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations.'"
Now, one of his points is this.
"Ironically, Obama and the Democrats have stood against nuclear power as a path to energy security and independence in the United States – which legitimately has energy concerns."
My fear is worse than that. It is starting to look as if Obama is more of a friend of Little Hitler, than he is of Israel. Or that he is so Naive about Iran that he is becoming DANGEROUS to Israel, and our own country.
You see, we have a President that goes on a World Wide Apology Tour. Apologizing for America, claiming that we are the source of all the problems in the world. He makes statements like we are not at war with Islam and we will work with Muslims "all over the world." Meanwhile he is attempting to tell Israel that they would lose if the attack Iran. The Mainstream Media is printing stories of such nonsense. He is telling Israel not to settle on their own land. Talking about Israel having to give up some of their Land "for peace." Yet, according to the The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate
LONDON -- President Barack Obama reiterated that Iran may have some right to nuclear energy _ provided it takes steps to prove its aspirations are peaceful.
Can you say Clinton and Kim Jong Il?
In a BBC interview broadcast Tuesday, Obama also restated plans to pursue direct diplomacy with Tehran to encourage it to set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons it might harbor.
It MIGHT? {Sigh}
Iran has insisted its nuclear program is aimed at generating electricity. But the U.S. and other Western governments accuse Tehran of seeking atomic weapons.
"Without going into specifics, what I do believe is that Iran has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations. On the other hand, the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region," Obama said.
Notice he did NOT say, "We do not want, nor will we allow, Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons." He said, "the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region,"
Just like he is talking about US, leading by example and doing away with our nukes. Maybe what he would like is Israel to lead by example and lay down their weapons. Then, there would be no reason for Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons. Right?
Folks, IF we were to do away with our Nuclear Weaponry, we would be the ONLY ones. Israel? They would cease to exist.
The comments echo remarks Obama made in Prague last month in which he said his administration would "support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections" if Iran proves it is no longer a nuclear threat.
Little Hitler just threw out some inspectors not to long ago. He brags about his nuclear progress, launches missiles, and says he wants to wipe Israel off the map. He just said this.
"We have said this before and we are saying it right now, that we will not talk about the nuclear issue with those outside the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency],"
Iranian state television described the news as Obama recognizing the "rights of the Iranian nation," a phrase typically used to refer to Iran's nuclear program.
The president has indicated a willingness to seek deeper international sanctions against Tehran if it does not respond positively to U.S. attempts to open negotiations on its nuclear program. Obama has said Tehran has until the end of the year to show it wants to engage.
"Although I don't want to put artificial time tables on that process, we do want to make sure that, by the end of this year, we've actually seen a serious process move forward. And I think that we can measure whether or not the Iranians are serious," Obama said.
HOW? Seriously. HOW? What is the measuring stick? How will Iran "show" that they are no longer a Nuclear Threat? That they want peace? HOW? Over Tea? "I promise?" Again, Kim Jong Il.
Obama's interview offered a preview of a speech he is to deliver in Egypt this week, saying he hoped the address would warm relations between Americans and Muslims abroad.
"What we want to do is open a dialogue," Obama told the BBC. "You know, there are misapprehensions about the West, on the part of the Muslim world. And, obviously, there are some big misapprehensions about the Muslim world when it comes to those of us in the West."
Only to you Mr. President. Only to you.
Obama leaves Tuesday evening on a trip to Egypt and Saudi Arabia aimed at reaching out to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims. He is due to make his speech in Cairo on Thursday.
Obama sounded an optimistic note about making progress toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, although he offered no new ideas for how he might try to secure a freeze on new building of Israeli settlements. The United States has called for a freeze, but Israeli leaders have rejected that.
OF COURSE THEY HAVE. Why should we impose our will on them? Right Mr. President? It IS thier land. It will be interesting to see what Obama DOES actually say about Israel. His idea's for Israel. Should be very interesting indeed.
Asked what he would say during his visit about human rights abuses, including the detention of political prisoners in Egypt, Obama indicated no stern lecture would be forthcoming.
He said he hoped to deliver the message that democratic values are principles that "they can embrace and affirm."
Obama added that there is a danger "when the United States, or any country, thinks that we can simply impose these values on another country with a different history and a different culture."
Uh, except Israel. Right? Folks, if I were Israel, I would be fueling the Jets. I would be getting the Bombs in place. I would be mapping out my attack. If I were Israel, listening to what Obama is saying, watching what Obama is doing, I would be getting the feeling that Obama is more friendly toward Ahmadinejad, and Islamic Terrorists, than he is with a long standing Ally, Israel.
Hey folks,
Yes Guy {Guy Harrison NRCC Executive Director} I saw this. I have been watching Little Hitler's {Mahmoud Ahmadinejad} rise to power, and his quest for Nuclear weapons for years. I understand the threat. Guy said this.
"I needed to make sure you saw this.
Iran as a nuclear power. Does that sound appealing to you? Because it does to President Obama, who, according to The Washington Post, believes that a country flush with oil, '…has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations.'"
Now, one of his points is this.
"Ironically, Obama and the Democrats have stood against nuclear power as a path to energy security and independence in the United States – which legitimately has energy concerns."
My fear is worse than that. It is starting to look as if Obama is more of a friend of Little Hitler, than he is of Israel. Or that he is so Naive about Iran that he is becoming DANGEROUS to Israel, and our own country.
You see, we have a President that goes on a World Wide Apology Tour. Apologizing for America, claiming that we are the source of all the problems in the world. He makes statements like we are not at war with Islam and we will work with Muslims "all over the world." Meanwhile he is attempting to tell Israel that they would lose if the attack Iran. The Mainstream Media is printing stories of such nonsense. He is telling Israel not to settle on their own land. Talking about Israel having to give up some of their Land "for peace." Yet, according to the The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate
LONDON -- President Barack Obama reiterated that Iran may have some right to nuclear energy _ provided it takes steps to prove its aspirations are peaceful.
Can you say Clinton and Kim Jong Il?
In a BBC interview broadcast Tuesday, Obama also restated plans to pursue direct diplomacy with Tehran to encourage it to set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons it might harbor.
It MIGHT? {Sigh}
Iran has insisted its nuclear program is aimed at generating electricity. But the U.S. and other Western governments accuse Tehran of seeking atomic weapons.
"Without going into specifics, what I do believe is that Iran has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations. On the other hand, the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region," Obama said.
Notice he did NOT say, "We do not want, nor will we allow, Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons." He said, "the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region,"
Just like he is talking about US, leading by example and doing away with our nukes. Maybe what he would like is Israel to lead by example and lay down their weapons. Then, there would be no reason for Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons. Right?
Folks, IF we were to do away with our Nuclear Weaponry, we would be the ONLY ones. Israel? They would cease to exist.
The comments echo remarks Obama made in Prague last month in which he said his administration would "support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections" if Iran proves it is no longer a nuclear threat.
Little Hitler just threw out some inspectors not to long ago. He brags about his nuclear progress, launches missiles, and says he wants to wipe Israel off the map. He just said this.
"We have said this before and we are saying it right now, that we will not talk about the nuclear issue with those outside the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency],"
Iranian state television described the news as Obama recognizing the "rights of the Iranian nation," a phrase typically used to refer to Iran's nuclear program.
The president has indicated a willingness to seek deeper international sanctions against Tehran if it does not respond positively to U.S. attempts to open negotiations on its nuclear program. Obama has said Tehran has until the end of the year to show it wants to engage.
"Although I don't want to put artificial time tables on that process, we do want to make sure that, by the end of this year, we've actually seen a serious process move forward. And I think that we can measure whether or not the Iranians are serious," Obama said.
HOW? Seriously. HOW? What is the measuring stick? How will Iran "show" that they are no longer a Nuclear Threat? That they want peace? HOW? Over Tea? "I promise?" Again, Kim Jong Il.
Obama's interview offered a preview of a speech he is to deliver in Egypt this week, saying he hoped the address would warm relations between Americans and Muslims abroad.
"What we want to do is open a dialogue," Obama told the BBC. "You know, there are misapprehensions about the West, on the part of the Muslim world. And, obviously, there are some big misapprehensions about the Muslim world when it comes to those of us in the West."
Only to you Mr. President. Only to you.
Obama leaves Tuesday evening on a trip to Egypt and Saudi Arabia aimed at reaching out to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims. He is due to make his speech in Cairo on Thursday.
Obama sounded an optimistic note about making progress toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, although he offered no new ideas for how he might try to secure a freeze on new building of Israeli settlements. The United States has called for a freeze, but Israeli leaders have rejected that.
OF COURSE THEY HAVE. Why should we impose our will on them? Right Mr. President? It IS thier land. It will be interesting to see what Obama DOES actually say about Israel. His idea's for Israel. Should be very interesting indeed.
Asked what he would say during his visit about human rights abuses, including the detention of political prisoners in Egypt, Obama indicated no stern lecture would be forthcoming.
He said he hoped to deliver the message that democratic values are principles that "they can embrace and affirm."
Obama added that there is a danger "when the United States, or any country, thinks that we can simply impose these values on another country with a different history and a different culture."
Uh, except Israel. Right? Folks, if I were Israel, I would be fueling the Jets. I would be getting the Bombs in place. I would be mapping out my attack. If I were Israel, listening to what Obama is saying, watching what Obama is doing, I would be getting the feeling that Obama is more friendly toward Ahmadinejad, and Islamic Terrorists, than he is with a long standing Ally, Israel.
I would not be feeling all that comfortable that the new American President has my back and I would be preparing to do whatever it takes to keep my Country, and my people safe. With or without America.
Peter
Sources:
The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate
Peter
Sources:
The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate
2 comments:
The only thing I can see we in the US has to apologize for is the fact that the voters were dumb enough to elect Obama in the first place.
If Iran gets the bomb it won't only be the US in danger. The whole world will be in danger.
Obama better stop apologizing and put some demands on the table.
If the demands aren't acted upon in a reasonable time then we better be ready to take drastic action.
Hey Irishgodfather,
Ignorance has a price. As we are finding out now.
This speech he gave clearly illustrates what I have been fearing he was doing. Telling Israel, "Screw You." We are now friends with those that want you dead.
I will be talking about the speech Sunday, but notice the concessions that he laid out for Israel and Palestine?
Israel, you give up some of your land. Muslims? you stop attacking Israel.
That is like saying to your two Sons, OK, I know that this has been your room, but you both have to give to make peace. You, my Son, must give up half your room, recognize that your Brother has a right to have the other half. Brother, you must stop punching your Brother in his head.
One gives up what they have no reason to give up, and the other is told to give up what they should not be doing in the first place. That is not compromise. Especially when we know that when this was done before, Brother got the Room but punched his Brother in the head even more.
Peter
Post a Comment