The Libs REALLY Want To Be Friends
Hey folks,
Yes the Libs REALLY want to be friends, with Iran, that is. It is unbelievably sad and actually, a little sickening, to watch. First , as I have been advising you of for the last two days of ABC’s "Good Morning America," and Diane Sawyer went to Iran to interview Little Hitler {President Ahmadinejad, for those who need a little more help in understanding} .
I pointed out the fact that it seemed from the interview that ABC was attempting to humanize Little Hitler. Show him as a nice guy. Someone we can deal with. Be friends with. Ask for his help.
Now it seems we have an ex-aid spewing out the normal LWL rhetoric. The Bush administration lied, covered up, and was just not fair. According to Reuters,
Controversy over a possible missed U.S. opportunity for rapprochement with Iran grew on Wednesday as former aide accused Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of misleading Congress on the issue.
Flynt Leverett, who worked on the National Security Council when it was headed by Rice, said a proposal vetted by Tehran's most senior leaders was sent to the United States in May 2003 and was akin to the 1972 U.S. opening to China.
Speaking at a conference on Capitol Hill, Leverett said he was confident it was seen by Rice and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell but "the administration rejected the overture."
In the first three paragraphs you see how this is going to go. Let’s highlight, shall we? First, who WANTS rapprochement? They want us dead. They said so. They want Israel wiped of the map. They said so. They are supplying Iraq with weapons to kill our soldiers. They deny, but we have proof.
Second, A proposal was vetted in 2003? By leaders no longer in power. What did this proposal say? Then he says, he was confident that Rice saw it. No proof. Just confident. She said she didn’t. All through this there is speculation, accusation, NO PROOF. As usual.
Then you have this article from the Christian Science Monitor by Peter Grier
The US may be trying to achieve a difficult balance regarding Iran: pushing the Iranians hard enough so they will negotiate over their nuclear program, yet not so hard as to increase tensions in a part of the world that's already aflame.
That's the conclusion some experts draw from the recent US attempt to lay out evidence that officials say links Iran to attacks against US troops in Iraq.
For weeks the White House had promised that it would present proof that Tehran is meddling in Iraq by providing arms and training to Shiite militias. Yet when the presentation came, it was somewhat low-key. It took place in Baghdad, not Washington. It focused almost entirely on a type of dangerous roadside bomb that Iran is allegedly supplying to its Iraqi allies.
Washington "is not claiming this is decisive, and they're not blaming the [Iraqi] insurgency on Iran," says George Perkovich, a nuclear nonproliferation scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "This is part of a bigger diplomatic strategy, which is genuinely designed to try to put more pressure on Iran so it will want to negotiate, and will be more forthcoming when it does."
Now the good General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, did say,
"That does not translate that the Iranian government per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this, What it does say is that things made in Iran are being used in Iraq to kill coalition soldiers."
Whatever that means. Then you have this article from the NYT, in the Business Section. This is just completely, well, typical of the Left Wing Looney mentality.
Western political and economic pressure on Iran over its nuclear program has chilled foreign investment to the extent that it is now squeezing the country’s long-fragile energy industry, adding strains to a government that is burdened by sanctions and wary of unrest at home.
STOP!!! America is evil. The Bush Administration is evil. These unfair sanctions are hurting poor little Iran. Give me a break. Are these people serious? Actually they are, this is what is so sad. Then the article tries to blame Bush for these companies not wanting to help out Iran. They have this Quote,
"Oil companies are simply assessing risk, including what some see as the real risk of a military strike against Iran," said Cliff Kupchan, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consulting firm, and a former senior State Department official. "Some are deciding it’s not worth it."
If Iran would stop suppling our enemies with weapons to kill our soldiers, stop saying they want us dead, stop trying to build nuclear bombs, they would not have to worry about being blown up. It really is that simple.
As far as this concept that yes, the weapons came from Iran, but we do not know who ordered it. Who cares? We sue people all the time in this country. Smith and Wesson for making a gun that killed someone. Tobacco Companies for making a product that kills. If they made it, they are responsible for it. Besides all that,
"Based on our understanding of the Iranian system and the history of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp operations, the intelligence community assesses that activity this extensive on the part of the Quds Force would not be conducted without approval from top leaders in Iran," said a senior intelligence official.
Yes folks, America is evil, Iran is oppressed by this big bad Bush administration. We are the cause of all the problems in the world. Amazing. Let’s just be friends.
Peter
Hey folks,
Yes the Libs REALLY want to be friends, with Iran, that is. It is unbelievably sad and actually, a little sickening, to watch. First , as I have been advising you of for the last two days of ABC’s "Good Morning America," and Diane Sawyer went to Iran to interview Little Hitler {President Ahmadinejad, for those who need a little more help in understanding} .I pointed out the fact that it seemed from the interview that ABC was attempting to humanize Little Hitler. Show him as a nice guy. Someone we can deal with. Be friends with. Ask for his help.
Now it seems we have an ex-aid spewing out the normal LWL rhetoric. The Bush administration lied, covered up, and was just not fair. According to Reuters,
Controversy over a possible missed U.S. opportunity for rapprochement with Iran grew on Wednesday as former aide accused Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of misleading Congress on the issue.
Flynt Leverett, who worked on the National Security Council when it was headed by Rice, said a proposal vetted by Tehran's most senior leaders was sent to the United States in May 2003 and was akin to the 1972 U.S. opening to China.Speaking at a conference on Capitol Hill, Leverett said he was confident it was seen by Rice and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell but "the administration rejected the overture."
In the first three paragraphs you see how this is going to go. Let’s highlight, shall we? First, who WANTS rapprochement? They want us dead. They said so. They want Israel wiped of the map. They said so. They are supplying Iraq with weapons to kill our soldiers. They deny, but we have proof.
Second, A proposal was vetted in 2003? By leaders no longer in power. What did this proposal say? Then he says, he was confident that Rice saw it. No proof. Just confident. She said she didn’t. All through this there is speculation, accusation, NO PROOF. As usual.Then you have this article from the Christian Science Monitor by Peter Grier
The US may be trying to achieve a difficult balance regarding Iran: pushing the Iranians hard enough so they will negotiate over their nuclear program, yet not so hard as to increase tensions in a part of the world that's already aflame.
That's the conclusion some experts draw from the recent US attempt to lay out evidence that officials say links Iran to attacks against US troops in Iraq.
For weeks the White House had promised that it would present proof that Tehran is meddling in Iraq by providing arms and training to Shiite militias. Yet when the presentation came, it was somewhat low-key. It took place in Baghdad, not Washington. It focused almost entirely on a type of dangerous roadside bomb that Iran is allegedly supplying to its Iraqi allies.
Washington "is not claiming this is decisive, and they're not blaming the [Iraqi] insurgency on Iran," says George Perkovich, a nuclear nonproliferation scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "This is part of a bigger diplomatic strategy, which is genuinely designed to try to put more pressure on Iran so it will want to negotiate, and will be more forthcoming when it does."
Now the good General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, did say,"That does not translate that the Iranian government per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this, What it does say is that things made in Iran are being used in Iraq to kill coalition soldiers."
Whatever that means. Then you have this article from the NYT, in the Business Section. This is just completely, well, typical of the Left Wing Looney mentality.
Western political and economic pressure on Iran over its nuclear program has chilled foreign investment to the extent that it is now squeezing the country’s long-fragile energy industry, adding strains to a government that is burdened by sanctions and wary of unrest at home.
STOP!!! America is evil. The Bush Administration is evil. These unfair sanctions are hurting poor little Iran. Give me a break. Are these people serious? Actually they are, this is what is so sad. Then the article tries to blame Bush for these companies not wanting to help out Iran. They have this Quote,
"Oil companies are simply assessing risk, including what some see as the real risk of a military strike against Iran," said Cliff Kupchan, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consulting firm, and a former senior State Department official. "Some are deciding it’s not worth it."
If Iran would stop suppling our enemies with weapons to kill our soldiers, stop saying they want us dead, stop trying to build nuclear bombs, they would not have to worry about being blown up. It really is that simple.
As far as this concept that yes, the weapons came from Iran, but we do not know who ordered it. Who cares? We sue people all the time in this country. Smith and Wesson for making a gun that killed someone. Tobacco Companies for making a product that kills. If they made it, they are responsible for it. Besides all that,
"Based on our understanding of the Iranian system and the history of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp operations, the intelligence community assesses that activity this extensive on the part of the Quds Force would not be conducted without approval from top leaders in Iran," said a senior intelligence official.
Yes folks, America is evil, Iran is oppressed by this big bad Bush administration. We are the cause of all the problems in the world. Amazing. Let’s just be friends.
Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment