Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Obama Israel. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Obama Israel. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

No Surprise, Israel US Ties Strained

As I said, Obama is no Friend of Israel

Hey folks,

I know there is other news out there. I really do. Obama still attempting to shove Obamacare on all of us by "any means necessary." Well, we still do not know if he will succeed. I know, I know, most think they will. Most think that the Loons will Vote themselves out of office to get this for Obama. We'll see.

But what I want to talk about is something that perhaps is even more important than all that. Yes. If we get Obamacare, it will be difficult to reverse it, but NOT impossible. However, it will only take ONE Bomb, and Thousands of US citizens will be lost forever. A US City will be gone. Our enemies will rejoice.

While Obama breaks every promise he makes, spends us into bankruptcy, and is obsessed with the take over of One Sixth of the US Economy, our enemies continue planning. Our Allies continue questioning our loyalties. Obama is failing again.

I have been telling you for some time that Obama is no friend of one of our oldest and dearest allies. Israel. Obama and his quest to make Muslin Nations love us. He loves them. He said he wants to work with Muslims all over the world. He has said he wants to give Muslim lead countries YOUR tax money to help them educate their Females. He has compared the Palestinians to American Black Slaves. He even said that Iran has "legitimate aspirations" when discussing their Nuclear Quest. But Israel?

He completely ignores them on his apology tours. Talks about how they will not be backed if they attack Iran. And then came right out and told them to freeze their settlements that were ACCEPTED by ALL previous American Administrations and even the Palestinians themselves.

Obama has been no friend to Israel. As a matter of fact, he has given us the feeling of being anti-Israel with his words and actions. Cozying up with Iran who said they want to wipe Israel off the map, even inviting them to a BBQ, and completely ignoring Israel. Now? Once again. According to Reuters - CORRECTED-Israeli envoy sees "historic crisis" with U.S.-report

Reuters - Tuesday, March 16 JERUSALEM - Israeli-U.S. relations have hit a 35-year low over a West Bank settlement plan that threatens to derail peacemaking efforts with the Palestinians, Israel's envoy to Washington was quoted as saying on Monday.

The comments attributed to Ambassador Michael Oren, a noted Middle East historian, clashed with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assurances that the row resulting from a settlement announcement deemed "insulting" by the Obama administration was under control.

"Israel's ties with the United States are in their worst crisis since 1975 ... a crisis of historic proportions," the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper quoted Oren as telling other Israeli diplomats in a telephone briefing over the weekend.

The remarks, also carried by other Israeli media, appeared to refer to U.S. pressure in 1975 for an Israeli redeployment in the Egyptian Sinai, occupied by Israel since the 1967 war and the site of renewed fighting in 1973.

Israel's Foreign Ministry had no immediate comment.

An Israeli plan to build 1,600 more homes for Jews in West Bank land annexed to Jerusalem was announced during a visit by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden aimed at ushering in indirect peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

In unusually blunt language, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Israel's behaviour "insulting." In a CNN interview on Friday, she said bilateral ties were "not at risk. I mean, our relationship is durable and strong."

Netanyahu, who has vowed to continue building in and around Jerusalem while reining in construction of Jewish settlements on other occupied land where Palestinians seek a state, voiced regret for what he described as bureaucratic happenstance.

"We know how to deal with these situations -- with equanimity, responsibly and seriously," he said on Sunday.

A U.S. envoy is due back in the region later in the week to try to get peace talks, suspended since December 2008, under way. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had resisted restarting negotiations without a total Israeli settlement freeze.


Folks, I'll say this for Netanyahu, he has FAR more patients than I. Israel no longer TRUSTS us. Thank you Obama. But thankfully they are not willing to turn their back on us, YET.

Of course the US State Department reaffirmed Israel remains a strategic Ally of the United States, at the same time, telling them to stop building on their own land.

Folks, Obama is completely incompetent when it comes to foreign affairs. He seems truly clueless. We have a LONG standing and WRITTEN Treaty, AKA, FRIENDSHIP, with Israel, and the islamofascists want us dead. Who is our friend? Whom should we be looking out for? Whom should be looking out for us if say someone like Iran was to launch an attack? I guess according to Obama, that would be, uh, Iran?

Like I said, this is no surprise.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk - NYT - Black Market Shows Iran Can Adapt to Sanctions
OPNTalk-
Completely Surreal. Thank You Obama
OPNTalk-
Obama Attacking Israel
OPNTalk-
US Tells Israel Stop Ranting and Raving About Iran
OPNTalk-
Obama States Iran's Nuclear Quest is "legitimate aspirations”
Reuters -
CORRECTED-Israeli envoy sees "historic crisis" with U.S.-report

Wednesday, June 03, 2009

Obama States Iran's Nuclear Quest is "legitimate aspirations”

So Naive it is dangerous.

Hey folks,

Yes Guy {Guy Harrison NRCC Executive Director} I saw this. I have been watching Little Hitler's {Mahmoud Ahmadinejad} rise to power, and his quest for Nuclear weapons for years. I understand the threat. Guy said this.

"I needed to make sure you saw this.

Iran as a nuclear power. Does that sound appealing to you? Because it does to President Obama, who, according to The Washington Post, believes that a country flush with oil, '…has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations.'"


Now, one of his points is this.

"Ironically, Obama and the Democrats have stood against nuclear power as a path to energy security and independence in the United States – which legitimately has energy concerns."

My fear is worse than that. It is starting to look as if Obama is more of a friend of Little Hitler, than he is of Israel. Or that he is so Naive about Iran that he is becoming DANGEROUS to Israel, and our own country.

You see, we have a President that goes on a World Wide Apology Tour. Apologizing for America, claiming that we are the source of all the problems in the world. He makes statements like we are not at war with Islam and we will work with Muslims "all over the world." Meanwhile he is attempting to tell Israel that they would lose if the attack Iran. The Mainstream Media is printing stories of such nonsense. He is telling Israel not to settle on their own land. Talking about Israel having to give up some of their Land "for peace." Yet, according to the The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate

LONDON -- President Barack Obama reiterated that Iran may have some right to nuclear energy _ provided it takes steps to prove its aspirations are peaceful.

Can you say Clinton and Kim Jong Il?

In a BBC interview broadcast Tuesday, Obama also restated plans to pursue direct diplomacy with Tehran to encourage it to set aside any ambitions for nuclear weapons it might harbor.

It MIGHT? {Sigh}

Iran has insisted its nuclear program is aimed at generating electricity. But the U.S. and other Western governments accuse Tehran of seeking atomic weapons.

"Without going into specifics, what I do believe is that Iran has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations. On the other hand, the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region," Obama said.


Notice he did NOT say, "We do not want, nor will we allow, Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons." He said, "the international community has a very real interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in the region,"

Just like he is talking about US, leading by example and doing away with our nukes. Maybe what he would like is Israel to lead by example and lay down their weapons. Then, there would be no reason for Iran to obtain Nuclear Weapons. Right?

Folks, IF we were to do away with our Nuclear Weaponry, we would be the ONLY ones. Israel? They would cease to exist.

The comments echo remarks Obama made in Prague last month in which he said his administration would "support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections" if Iran proves it is no longer a nuclear threat.

Little Hitler just threw out some inspectors not to long ago. He brags about his nuclear progress, launches missiles, and says he wants to wipe Israel off the map. He just said this.

"We have said this before and we are saying it right now, that we will not talk about the nuclear issue with those outside the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency],"

Iranian state television described the news as Obama recognizing the "rights of the Iranian nation," a phrase typically used to refer to Iran's nuclear program.

The president has indicated a willingness to seek deeper international sanctions against Tehran if it does not respond positively to U.S. attempts to open negotiations on its nuclear program. Obama has said Tehran has until the end of the year to show it wants to engage.

"Although I don't want to put artificial time tables on that process, we do want to make sure that, by the end of this year, we've actually seen a serious process move forward. And I think that we can measure whether or not the Iranians are serious," Obama said.


HOW? Seriously. HOW? What is the measuring stick? How will Iran "show" that they are no longer a Nuclear Threat? That they want peace? HOW? Over Tea? "I promise?" Again, Kim Jong Il.

Obama's interview offered a preview of a speech he is to deliver in Egypt this week, saying he hoped the address would warm relations between Americans and Muslims abroad.

"What we want to do is open a dialogue," Obama told the BBC. "You know, there are misapprehensions about the West, on the part of the Muslim world. And, obviously, there are some big misapprehensions about the Muslim world when it comes to those of us in the West."


Only to you Mr. President. Only to you.

Obama leaves Tuesday evening on a trip to Egypt and Saudi Arabia aimed at reaching out to the world's 1.5 billion Muslims. He is due to make his speech in Cairo on Thursday.

Obama sounded an optimistic note about making progress toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, although he offered no new ideas for how he might try to secure a freeze on new building of Israeli settlements. The United States has called for a freeze, but Israeli leaders have rejected that.


OF COURSE THEY HAVE. Why should we impose our will on them? Right Mr. President? It IS thier land. It will be interesting to see what Obama DOES actually say about Israel. His idea's for Israel. Should be very interesting indeed.

Asked what he would say during his visit about human rights abuses, including the detention of political prisoners in Egypt, Obama indicated no stern lecture would be forthcoming.

He said he hoped to deliver the message that democratic values are principles that "they can embrace and affirm."

Obama added that there is a danger "when the United States, or any country, thinks that we can simply impose these values on another country with a different history and a different culture."

Uh, except Israel. Right? Folks, if I were Israel, I would be fueling the Jets. I would be getting the Bombs in place. I would be mapping out my attack. If I were Israel, listening to what Obama is saying, watching what Obama is doing, I would be getting the feeling that Obama is more friendly toward Ahmadinejad, and Islamic Terrorists, than he is with a long standing Ally, Israel.

I would not be feeling all that comfortable that the new American President has my back and I would be preparing to do whatever it takes to keep my Country, and my people safe. With or without America.
Peter

Sources:
The Washington Post - Obama says Iran's energy concerns legitimate

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Israel Does Not Trust Obama

Why Should Israel Trust Obama?

Hey folks,

I've been telling you my growing concern about Obama and his quest to make Muslin Nations love us. He loves them. He said he wants to work with Muslims all over the world. He has said he wants to give Muslim lead countries YOUR tax money to help them educate their Females. He has compared the Palestinians to American Black Slaves. But Israel?

He completely ignores them on his apology tours. Talks about how they will not be backed if they attack Iran. And then came right out and told them to freeze their settlements that were ACCEPTED by ALL previous American Administrations and even the Palestinians themselves.

Obama has been no friend to Israel. As a matter of fact, he has given us the feeling of being anti-Israel with his words and actions. Cozying up with Iran who said they want to wipe Israel off the map, even inviting them to a BBQ, and completely ignoring Israel, and long time ally.

So this comes as no surprise. According to The Jerusalem Post - 'US misstepped regarding settlements'

The current tensions between Israel and the United States, most recently demonstrated by a poll which showed America's public image on the decline in the Jewish state, might have been avoided had US President Barack Obama not taken such a harsh stance against settlement construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, the editorial published by the Washington Post on Thursday stated.

While acknowledging that confrontation over steps needed to achieve peace was inevitable between the US administration and the various regional players in the Middle East, the editorial maintained that Obama should have accepted initial Israeli concessions, and should have avoided the demand for a total settlement freeze.

"Rather than pocketing Mr. Netanyahu's initial concessions - he gave a speech on Palestinian statehood and suggested parameters for curtailing settlements accepted by previous US administrations - Mr. Obama chose to insist on an absolutist demand for a settlement 'freeze,' the editorial stated. "Palestinian and Arab leaders who had accepted previous compromises immediately hardened their positions; they also balked at delivering the 'confidence-building' concessions to Israel that the administration seeks."


What happened to the US not dictating to other countries? Oh, with the exception of Israel. Right?

In addition, the paper maintained that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's government earned critical public support due to what Israelis perceived as unfair treatment from Washington.

"Israeli public opinion, which normally leans against the settler movement, has rallied behind Mr. Netanyahu," the editorial said. "And Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, which were active during the Bush administration's final year, have yet to resume."


Obama is making it WORSE. As I said before. If I were Israel, I would not be trusting Obama. Turns out they DON'T!

The piece went on to state that an eventual compromise between the US and Israel over settlements, which would see some building projects completed with others temporarily halted, will inevitably draw more criticism from Arab states than it would have had the issue not been escalated in the first place.

"If he is to be effective in brokering a peace deal, Mr. Obama will need to show both sides that they can trust him," the paper stated, adding that he must also "be tough on more than one country."

Yeah but that is not going to happens. They say actions speak louder than words. Obama's ACTIONS scream Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israel. His actions SCREAM he loves Muslims and even those that want Israel destroyed and whom also wants to kill us. Way to go Mr. President. Yes, the World will love us now, because Obama is President? I think not. The World is a far more dangerous place now, than it has ever been. Believe it or not, we can thank Obama for that as well.
Peter

Sources:
The Jerusalem Post - 'US misstepped regarding settlements'

Sunday, January 15, 2012

Israel NOT Playing. Nor Should They.

Israel does NOT trust Obama. It really IS that simple.

Hey folks,

This is just inconceivable. It is completely idiotic. We have Iran. You know him, you love him, Little Hitler himself, Ahmadinejad, telling the world that the Holocaust never happened. That America is the Great Satin and he WILL wipe Israel off the Map. He is ACTIVELY engaged in building a Nuclear Weapon and the means to deliver it. He has SAID that he cares not about any Sanctions. He will not stop until someone stops him. Now he is playing War Games in the Strait of Hormuz saying he will cut off the World's Oil Supply Route, even threatening the US Navy.

We have Israel, the target of many in the Middle East and our FRIEND and ALLY. They want him stopped but they know that THIS Administration is less than likely to do ANYTHING but talk tough. They are preparing, which is what I said I would do if I were them, to go it alone if necessary.

Then we have THIS Administration. What are they doing? Warning Israel against doing anything about it. Yes, Obama and Crew are warning Israel to NOT defend themselves and others in the area. They are warning them NOT to interfere in Iran's War Games. I kid you not. According to the The Wall Street Journal - U.S. Warns Israel on Strike Officials Lobby Against Attack on Iran as Military Leaders Bolster Defenses By ADAM ENTOUS,JULIAN E. BARNES and JAY SOLOMON

WASHINGTON—U.S. defense leaders are increasingly concerned that Israel is preparing to take military action against Iran, over U.S. objections, and have stepped up contingency planning to safeguard U.S. facilities in the region in case of a conflict.
Now WHY would this possibly be. Hmm? It is not a hard concept folks. Israel does NOT trust Obama. It really IS that simple. They are target number ONE. They are getting ready to DEFEND themselves.

President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other top officials have delivered a string of private messages to Israeli leaders warning about the dire consequences of a strike. The U.S. wants Israel to give more time for the effects of sanctions and other measures intended to force Iran to abandon its perceived efforts to build nuclear weapons.

Stepping up the pressure, Mr. Obama spoke by telephone on Thursday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and U.S. Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will meet with Israeli military officials in Tel Aviv next week.

The high-stakes planning and diplomacy comes as U.S. officials warn Tehran, including through what administration officials described Friday as direct messages to Iran's leaders, against provocative actions.
AGAINST provocative actions?!?! They continue to BUILD A NUCLEAR WEAPON!! They are THREATENING US. They WILL Drop a Nuke ON Israel the first chance they get. They just moved aggressively toward one of OUR Ships. Warned AGAINST provocative actions?!?! Ahmadinejad and Iran under his Control IS provocative actions.

Tehran has warned that it could retaliate to tightened sanctions by blocking oil trade through the Strait of Hormuz. On Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed to punish the perpetrators of the assassination—blamed by Iran on the U.S. and Israel—of an Iranian scientist involved in the nuclear program.

The U.S. denied the charge and condemned the attack. Israel hasn't commented.

The U.S. and Iran, however, have taken steps in recent days apparently designed to ease tensions. Iran has agreed to host a delegation of United Nations nuclear inspectors this month. The U.S., meanwhile, has twice this month rescued Iranian sailors in the region's seas.

Covert efforts by Israel's intelligence service to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons have been credited with slowing the program without the high risk of military conflict that could be sparked by an airstrike. Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful uses.
I was going to cut this nonsense out. But I left it in. Basically this is simple Blah, Blah, Blah, BS. Meanwhile Little Hitler continues to prepare to carry out their plans. Then there is this little tidbit of truth and logic..

But Israel has declined to rule out a strike, as has the U.S.

"It is the policy of the Israeli government, and the Obama administration, that all options remain on the table. And it is crucial that the ayatollahs in Tehran take this policy seriously," said Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the U.S.
Well, it is the Policy of Israel, as well it should be, but they do not REALLY Trust it is of Obama. More Blah, Blah, Blah... Then this..

Israeli officials said Mr. Netanyahu's government continues to closely coordinate with the U.S. in responding to the Iranian threat. "Israel believes that heightened sanctions combined with a credible military threat may dissuade the Iranian regime from developing nuclear capabilities," Mr. Oren said.

Mr. Panetta and other top officials have privately sought assurances from Israeli leaders in recent weeks that they won't take military action against Iran. But the Israeli response has been noncommittal, U.S. officials said.

U.S. officials briefed on the military's planning said concern has mounted over the past two years that Israel may strike Iran. But rising tensions with Iran and recent changes at Iranian nuclear sites have ratcheted up the level of U.S. alarm.

"Our concern is heightened," a senior U.S. military official said of the probability of an Israeli strike over U.S. objections.
Sanctions combined with a Credible Military Threat. That is the KEY. A VIABLE threat. They do not fear Obama. They KNOW he will not do anything. So Israel will not wait too much longer.

Despite the close relationship between the U.S. and Israel, U.S. officials have consistently puzzled over Israeli intentions. "It's hard to know what's bluster and what's not with the Israelis," said a former U.S. official.
Thank you OBAMA!!! He is the main PROBLEM here. Make no mistake about it folks. NONE. Israel WILL attack if they feel they have run out of time and options. Including relying on US to help them. They WILL attack and LEVEL Iran if they have too. If WE only had a Leader that understood Reality and how to deal with people like this, Israel might NOT be as on edge. But just like you, me, or anyone else, if they have to, they WILL Protect their HOME, and FAMILY, by any means necessary. As well they should.
Peter

Sources:
The Wall Street Journal - U.S. Warns Israel on Strike Officials Lobby Against Attack on Iran as Military Leaders Bolster Defenses

Friday, May 15, 2009

Is There an Obama-Gadhafi Link?

Well this is interesting.

Hey folks,

Happy FRIDAY!! Since it is Friday, it's time to go to the Emails. This was sent in by BG. Thank you BG. It truly is interesting. Here it is for you to read and digest for yourselves. See you soon.

Is There an Obama-Gadhafi Link?
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:15 PM
By: Scott Wheeler

Whose interest was President Obama serving when on March 30 he ordered Chrysler to either conclude a merger with Italian automaker Fiat within 30 days or lose federal bailout funds which would lead to its immediate demise?

That untimely announcement placed Chrysler in the untenable position of accepting whatever Fiat offered, literally cutting the legs out from under the struggling American carmaker’s negotiating platform. Some financial analysts had already determined that what Fiat was offering was a very bad deal for Chrysler.

“The steal of the century,” Forbes columnist Jerry Flint wrote of the deal back in January, “Fiat gets Chrysler for next to no money, and American taxpayers must throw in $7 billion to make it happen.” By most accounts, Chrysler was in real trouble, but by announcing to the world that Chrysler had no other alternatives Obama effectively told Fiat that Chrysler would accept whatever Fiat offered, eliminating Chrysler’s ability to cut a better deal.

Why would Obama undercut a U.S. company, involved in a heated negotiation, in favor of a foreign company’s interest?

Clear answers are not available, but there is one very curious shareholder in Fiat that raises some interesting questions. The African nation of Libya owns at least a 2 percent stake in Fiat and thus makes Moammar Gadhafi, who controls the wealth of Libya, a direct beneficiary of the deal favoring Fiat.

Does Obama owe Gadhafi?

That is a tough question to answer, but Obama’s record-shattering $700 million presidential fundraising operation and a revealing speech made by Gadhafi nearly a year ago, seem to undress Obama’s inexplicable sabotage of Chrysler’s negotiating position with Fiat.

Before anyone was suspicious of the sources of Obama’s campaign funds, Gadhafi made a speech that was carried by Al Jazeera on June 11, 2008 and translated by The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

"All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency."

Is Gadhafi revealing his knowledge of something that no one else even suspected at the time?

Since Gadhafi's June 2008 speech, other evidence has surfaced suggesting that Obama raised significant sums from dubious sources in Gadhafi's neighborhood including tens of thousands of dollars the campaign was forced to return once it was revealed the origin of the funds was in Gaza, the Middle East.

So far there has been very little interest in the sources of Obama’s massive fundraising, and with Democrats in control of both houses of congress it is unlikely that there will be an investigation into what many believe is the most prolific fundraising abuse ever.

Gadhafi's prescient speech didn’t end with his apparent knowledge of Obama’s sources of campaign funds though. MEMRI’s translation also included Gadhafi’s foreknowledge that Obama’s campaign rhetoric about supporting Israel was just a head fake also.

"But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother who is an American national, made statements [about Jerusalem] that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world . . .

"As you know, this is the farce of elections — a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him,” Gadhafi stated in his speech that got no coverage from the mainstream American media.

Since his election, it has been pro-Israel Americans who have been shocked at how quickly Obama’s policies turned hostile toward Israel, such as the $900 million in aid headed to Gaza after they attacked Israel with mortars late last year, and forcing Israel to negotiate with Hamas.

With the precision of a campaign insider, Gadhafi also predicted a recently announced Obama policy regarding Israel nearly a year ago: "We thought he would say: 'I have decided that if I win, I will monitor the Dimona nuclear plant, and the other WMD in Israeli's possession.'”

Last week, a State Department official announced that the Obama administration would pressure Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty that would allow among other details, Obama to inspect Israel’s nuclear weapons program, something the Israeli’s have kept secret since its inception.

What is most amazing is that the propaganda arm of the Middle East, the anti-American Al Jazeera network, has proven more informative about Obama’s Middle East policies than the sycophantic American media.

Scott Wheeler is executive director of The National Republican Trust PAC (GOPtrust.com), the nation’s third-largest political action committee.

LINK: Newsmax.com - Is There an Obama-Gadhafi Link?
Note: "From The Emails" is a weekly segment in the Friday edition of the OPNtalk Blog. If you care to send in News Articles, Comments, Stories, or anything else you may wish to share, please feel free to send it to opntalk@aim.com As always, you never know what you are going to see here.

Sunday, September 06, 2009

Obama Attacking Israel

Israel is about to say SCREW YOU OBAMA.

Hey folks,

Rightfully so. I would. If I were Israel, I would say SCREW YOU OBAMA! I have documented this over the past few months. Plain and simple, Obama is no friend of Israel. So this one just ticks me off to no end, but is not a surprise either.

According to the AP - US harshly rebukes Israel on settlement plans I also want to make this PERFECTLY Clear. OBAMA harshly rebukes Israel on settlement plans, NOT the US. Most of us here are still FRIENDS with Israel. But here is the piece by MATTHEW LEE, Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Alarmed by Israeli plans to build new housing units in settlements and dimming prospects for American peace efforts, the Obama administration on Friday put out a rare and harsh public rebuke of its main Mideast ally.

The White House said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's settlement plans were "inconsistent" with commitments the Jewish state has made previously and harmful to U.S. attempts to lay the groundwork for a resumption in peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.


That is because he wants to give EVERYTHING to the Palestinians. What about when Israel DID give up land and the Palestinians moved in and attacked Israel AFTER? Did they live up THEIR commitments?

"United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued settlement expansion and we urge that it stop," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement. "We are working to create a climate in which negotiations can take place, and such actions make it harder to create such a climate."

And, if I were Netanyahu, I would say SCREW YOU! Whatever happened to not dictating our will on others?

Netanyahu's aides, speaking on condition of anonymity Friday because the plans have not been formally announced, said any Israeli settlement freeze would not halt building the new units and or block completion of some 2,500 others currently under construction. They also said the freeze would not include east Jerusalem, which the Palestinians hope to make their future capital.

It's NOT THEIR LAND. Sorry Obama. They are also NOT American Black Slaves as you have compared them to.

The unusually blunt White House criticism reflected the administration's growing frustration with Netanyahu, whose decision would approve hundreds of new housing units in West Bank settlements before considering even a temporary freeze in construction, as President Barack Obama has requested.

SO WHAT? Who cares what Obama requested. What has he requested of the Palestinians? Oh yeah, please stop attacking Israel. Let ME give you their land. I forgot. But this does NOT "reflected the administration's growing frustration with Netanyahu," it shows that Obama is anti-Israel. He always has been.

The White House typically refrains from commenting on such moves until they are formally announced. But in this case, U.S. officials said they acted because Mideast peace envoy George Mitchell had already been briefed on the Israeli plans earlier in the week.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said Mitchell and the Israelis had been having "a very open dialogue" in "very intense discussions." He would not elaborate.

But one U.S. official familiar with Mitchell's Wednesday meeting in New York with Netanyahu envoy Yitzhak Molcho and Israeli Defense Ministry chief of staff Michael Herzog said the Israelis "told Mitchell they were going to do it and he told them they could expect a sharp response."


Folks, this really is downright scary. We have a President that wants to denounce our Allies and embrace our Enemies. It really is just that simple.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive diplomatic exchange, said the meeting had "not gone well."

The official added that the White House statement was released before a formal Israeli announcement of Netanyahu's plans because "we wanted to send a strong signal early on."


I hope they send one back. You know what it is.

Publicly, the State Department had described Mitchell's discussion with the Israeli delegation — which came after his talks with Netanyahu a week earlier in London — as a "good meeting."

The department said Mitchell would travel again to the Middle East next week to follow up. That trip is still on, officials said Friday.

"The process will continue," said one. The official also noted that the statement was not entirely negative and expressed appreciation for "Israel's stated intent to place limits on settlement activity."

"We are working with all parties — Israelis, Palestinians, and Arab states — on the steps they must take to achieve that objective," said Gibbs.

Netanyahu's refusal to bend on the settlement issue despite repeated U.S. appeals threatens to damage Obama's credibility in the Arab world. The administration is counting on Arab support for a resumption in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations but will not likely get it unless Netanyahu makes concessions on settlements.


So Israel has to be rebuked to make Muslims happy? IDIOTS!

The Palestinians have said they will not sit down for talks unless there is a settlement freeze and Arab leaders have made similar demands.

Folks, I repeat. We have a President that wants to denounce our Allies and embrace our Enemies. You want to compare someone to American Slaves? Start with the Jews. They have been oppressed longer than ANYONE in the History of the World. From the Roman Empire to the Holocaust to today. But I guess he would rather compare a bunch of terrorists to the American Slaves. In his warped mind, they better relate.

I warned you about this. Israel can no longer rely on the friendship it HAD with the US. They are pretty much on their own. Our President is more worried about keeping his credibility with Muslims, a lot of whom would rather see us destroyed, than he is worried about our greatest Ally ever, in the Middle East.
Peter

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

US More Concerned About Israel Than Iran?

It's about time SOMEONE did something.

Hey folks,

This is both sad and pathetic. Typical with Obama and Crew, who we have already documented in depth here, is no friend of Israel. But they ARE our long time Ally and Friend. They fear that Israel may feel the need to defend themselves. Imagine THAT. They already know they can't rely on us. Not with Obama in the White House. So they may very well go it alone. I hope they do. I hope God is with them, because Obama will not be.

Look. I have watched Little Hitler {Mahmoud Ahmadinejad} rise to power. I have told you his intentions, because HE has told all of us them. I have documented PROOF of his intentions. His Words and HIS DEEDS. He is not hard to understand. He will not stop until SOMEONE stops him.

He wants to wipe Israel off the Map. He said so. He wants US to turn to Islam, or be destroy in a great fire. He SAID so. He HAS built Rockets that can carry Nukes. He has tested them. They can reach Israel, and other US interests. He IS BUILDING A NUCLEAR BOMB! He will USE it. He is also currently attempting to go to Space.

We also know that HE is supplying our enemies with weapons, funds, and intel. We KNOW that he was behind the Assassination Plot against the Saudi Arabian Ambassador to the U.S., Adel al-Jubeir, and bomb the Israeli and Saudi embassies in Washington, D.C. Yet? We do nothing.

It reminds me of the Clinton Years. Attack after attack. No response. Attack after attack. Nothing. Then 9-11. BOOM! For YEARS Little Hitler has been growing in power and technology. He is on a mission. Sanctions have NEVER worked. They will NOT work now. While we do nothing, and simply "Talk Tough," Little Hitler waves and smiles. Next thing we know? Maybe an even bigger BOOM! This time with a Mushroom Cloud accompanying it.

So Israel is getting concerned. I don't blame them. They are stated target ONE. They watch as we not only ignore Iran, but ASSIST the Muslim Brotherhood, topple Governments and take over Countries. Now WE are concerned about ISRAEL being concerned? According to YNet News.com - US fears uncoordinated Israeli strike on Iran By Alex Fishman Published: 10.31.11, 10:24

Washington concerned Israel will mount military operation against Islamic Republic, State Department official says. US consequently putting greater pressure on Security Council to impose harsher sanctions on Iran
It's about time SOMEONE did something.

Fearing an uncoordinated Israeli attack against Iran, the United States is working on several levels to pressure the UN's Security Council into imposing harsher sanctions on Iran, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Monday.

A senior US State Department official said there was growing concern among Obama administration officials ahead of an IAEA report set to be published in November indicating considerable progress in Tehran's development of its military nuclear program.

The US is concerned that the report may trigger Israeli actions against the Islamic Republic which may not necessarily be in line with US interests in the region.
I'm not. I'm WITH them. Get this.

The official said that Washington's reevaluation of an Israeli strike in Iran is based on various maneuvers Israel has performed in the past few years.
While we did NOTHING. They are the first ones to go. Thanks to Obama and Crew's LOVE for Islamofascism, and HIS actions over the Past few years, they have NO CHOICE. I called this a while back. I said THIS back on June 3rd 2009

Folks, if I were Israel, I would be fueling the Jets. I would be getting the Bombs in place. I would be mapping out my attack. If I were Israel, listening to what Obama is saying, watching what Obama is doing, I would be getting the feeling that Obama is more friendly toward Ahmadinejad, and Islamic Terrorists, than he is with a long standing Ally, Israel.

I would not be feeling all that comfortable that the new American President has my back and I would be preparing to do whatever it takes to keep my Country, and my people safe. With or without America.
This is what they are doing. Make no mistake about it. They HAVE to. What? What is Obama going to say after the big cloud dissipates? "Uh, Sorry?" AFTER Israel is wiped off the Map, and we are next, THEN Obama MAY do something? Yeah, he probably would. Invite them to a BBQ. Also, check this out. WHY?

Washington is therefore pressing China and Russia who are currently opposed to the publication of the IAEA report. The report may cause embarrassment to both countries who are strongly against harsher sanctions on Iran.

According to the US official, it is possible that the report, coupled with the exposure of the US evaluation of Israeli potential to strike Iran, will encourage Russia and China to support the US initiative to aggravate penal measures against Tehran.
Why would they be opposed to the release? Because, I'm just guessing here, MAYBE, it tells the TRUTH? That Little Hitler, if he doesn't already have Nukes, IS closer than anyone "thought?" THIS report in the New York Times, would also be a concern for me if I were Israel.

On Saturday, the New York Times reported that the United States plans to bolster its military presence in the Gulf after the withdrawal of its troops from Iraq.

Citing unnamed officials and diplomats, the newspaper said the repositioning could include new combat forces in Kuwait able to respond to a collapse of security in Iraq or a military confrontation with Iran.
Uh, what does that mean? Are we going there to help Israel? Or Protect Iran? Obama said we would not back Israel if they attacked Iran's Nuclear Facilities. So would we actually fight AGAINST them? With Obama, THAT would not be outside the realm of concern.

I said this before. We NEED a Leader in this Country that understands REALITY. We need one that will take a TRUE Apology Tour. One that will apologize to, and reassure our FRIENDS and ALLIES, that we are BACK. That America is BACK. We need someone strong enough to tell our Enemies. WE ARE BACK. You are with us, or against us. If you even think about attacking us, or our friends, have no doubt you will face the Pure and Unadulterated POWER of the American Military. If you are with us, we will help you in anyway we can. We need a TRUE leader back to make us a shining city on the Hill once again. We need a Leader that will fix our problems and be ready for anything. We need our Allies to TRUST us again. And we need our Enemies to FEAR us again. It is no more complicated than that.
Peter

Sources:
YNet News.com - US fears uncoordinated Israeli strike on Iran

Thursday, June 04, 2009

What Is With Obama and Islam?

I'm seriously starting to wonder.

Hey folks,

What is it? Yesterday I told you how Obama seems to be getting more friendly with Muslims than he is with a long time Ally, and 60 year plus Ally, Israel. I even said this.

"Folks, if I were Israel, I would be fueling the Jets. I would be getting the Bombs in place. I would be mapping out my attack. If I were Israel, listening to what Obama is saying, watching what Obama is doing, I would be getting the feeling that Obama is more friendly toward Ahmadinejad, and Islamic Terrorists, than he is with a long standing Ally, Israel.

I would not be feeling all that comfortable that the new American President has my back and I would be preparing to do whatever it takes to keep my Country, and my people safe. With or without America. "

But NOW? Now I am SERIOUSLY starting to wonder WHAT is it? What is with Obama and Islam? Now I know that just about an hour from now, he will be delivering a "historic" speech from Egypt, to Muslims everywhere. I really am interested to see what he actually says about Israel. I have a good idea. I'm not telling you until he actually says it. I can't believe even he is stupid enough to go through with it, so I'll wait to see if this is true.

But we do not need this speech to actually see where he stands. This is the second trip he will NOT be stopping by to visit Israel. Nope. But he will be bow,, huh, visiting a bunch of Muslims.

Now is this is one sign? The fact he has been attempting to dictate to Israel what they can and can't do on there own land, while making statements like this?

"Without going into specifics, what I do believe is that Iran has legitimate energy concerns, legitimate aspirations."

Then just yesterday, he said this.

"One of the points I want to make is if you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world."

What? Really? There are Between 2.3 to about 3 million Muslims in America. 80 million in Egypt, Pakistan 150 million Muslims. Something like 156 million Muslims India, 200 million Muslims in Indonesia, So the numbers just do not add up. But then again, he also recently said that "we are NOT a Christian Nation." But yet, we are "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world?"

Then you have this little tidbit. Remember all during the election, Obama's Father was an Agnostic? Now his Father was a Muslim?

Now do not get me wrong here. I could not care less if Obama was to follow the Muslim Faith. Unless that includes wanting to kill us. It really doesn't matter to me either way. I think that Obama uses whatever Religion that will be beneficial to him at the time. Like this comment April 6 address to the Turkish Parliament.

"Americans have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim majority country. I know, because I am one of them."

I do not believe that he is all that faithful in ANY Religion.

My problem with all this is that he is saying to Israel, "Screw off." He is saying to America, "Screw Off." He is attempting to rip this country apart from the inside. He is trying to rewrite history. He is trying to destroy the very foundation that we were founded on. Just to remind Obama, it is "In God We Trust." We are "One Nation Under God." Not One Nation "striving in the way of Allah."Is he BECOMING a full fledged Muslim? Has he always been? Does it matter?

What does matter is that he IS taking over this country. He IS Socializing this country. He IS dissing Israel. He is ENCOURAGING those that hate and want to destroy Israel, and those that hate and want to destroy what America is. He is doing it for them.

Yes folks, this speech should be quite interesting indeed.
Peter

Sources:
Fox News - Obama Renews Openness About His Muslim Roots Ahead of Egypt Speech
ABC News - The Emergence of President Obama's Muslim Roots

Sunday, August 02, 2009

US Tells Israel Stop Ranting and Raving About Iran

Talk about sheer arrogance and stupidity

Hey folks,

This article caught my attention at first. It's from the The Nation - US Tells Israel: Iran Has Eight Weeks. But then I started reading it. It's by Robert Dreyfuss – Fri Jul 31, 10:07 am ET. That is where I stopped.

Remember Robert Dreyfuss? He is a former IWA award recipient. He is the guy that thinks any terror plot foiled here in the US is a scam. Poor innocent Muslims tricked into becoming Terrorists, by the evil Government undercover agents. I'm not kidding. This guy is a nut and a big Anti-War Kook. He does not posses an ounce of intelligence.

This article is not different. Here is an example. He starts off telling us how the US as just told Israel to stop "Ranting and Raving" about Iran for Eight weeks.

Eight weeks! According to Haaretz, the liberal Israeli daily, that's how much time they're willing to give Iran to start talking. Let's hope that Iran does start talking by then, but if they don't, well, then it'll take longer.

Translation? "Then it will take longer. Who cares. How dare we tell Iran how long it will take. Who the hell cares about Israel anyway. Right?" Then he says this

Just a guess, but I think top Israeli officials are well aware of what the vaunted minions of the Israel lobby are doing in Washington.

Yeah he doesn't like Lieberman nor Israel, nor SANCTIONS. He thinks SANCTIONS against Iran are bad. {Laughing} Like I said, the guy is a Kook. So I just went to the REAL story here. Haaretz - U.S. briefs Israel on new Iran nuke sanctions By Barak Ravid

American officials briefed Israel this week on the administration's ideas for intensifying sanctions against Iran if it fails to respond to President Barack Obama's offer of dialogue.

U.S. National Security Advisor James Jones, who is now in Israel to discuss Iran's nuclear program, indicated that Tehran has until the UN General Assembly in the last week of September to respond. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates delivered a similar message during his visit here earlier this week. If no satisfactory answer is received, the Americans said, they would work to form an international coalition to impose harsh sanctions on Iran.


Yeah, Obama is to important to visit Israel himself. Right? He sends underlings to dictate to them how they should act. Get this sheer and outright arrogance.

A senior source in Jerusalem said the American message to Israel in these talks was to "lower its profile" and refrain from "ranting and raving" about Iran in public until the international evaluation on Iran takes place at the end of September. "Until that date, we must give diplomacy a chance," the official said.

ABSOLUTE BS! Do you understand what this just said? Seriously? Do you get it. The US, under Obama rule, just told an American Ally what they can and cannot say in public? Is he going to tell Iran to stop "Ranting and Raving" in public about wiping Israel Off the Map? What about the trials of the Protesters? You know most of them are dead. What about their "Rants and Raves" about the US? OH yeah, we do not impose our will on other countries, except Israel.

New sanctions would mainly aim to significantly curb Tehran's ability to import refined petroleum products. Despite its huge crude oil reserves, Iran has only limited refining capacity, so it imports large quantities of refined products such as gasoline.

Jones and his team reported that a bill by Senator Joe Lieberman to curb sales of refined oil products to Iran is almost complete, and 67 senators have already signed it.

The Americans are proposing financial sanctions such as banning insurance on trade deals with Tehran, which would make it difficult for Iran to trade with other countries. They also want to impose sanctions on any company that trades with Iran and use this to pressure other countries, mainly in Asia, to resist making deals with Iran.

In the next stage, the Americans will consider even harsher sanctions, such as banning Iranian ships from docking in Western ports and, as a next step, banning Iranian airplanes from landing in Western airports.

The talks were held Wednesday and Thursday. The Israeli team was headed by National Security Advisor Uzi Arad and included Mossad head Meir Dagan, Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin, director of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission Dr. Shaul Horev, and other defense and Foreign Ministry officials.

Jones and his team - including the president's special advisor Dennis Ross, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns, and Gary Seymour, the White House official in charge of arms control and nonproliferation, who is a close friend of Arad's - also met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi.

On Tuesday night, when Jones arrived, Arad held a reception for him at the David's Citadel Hotel in Jerusalem.

Jones and his team presented the ideas that the administration is forging, together with France, Britain and Germany, on imposing additional sanctions on Iran via the UN Security Council if the dialogue fails. The Americans are also discussing this issue with Russia, which at this stage objects to further sanctions.

China, which has numerous interests in Iran, also objects to further sanctions. Jones told the Israelis that Obama will therefore go to China soon to try to enlist Beijing to join the coalition.

Why will Obama NOT go to Israel? He loves going to Dictatorships, most likely hoping to learn from them, but Israel? He keeps dissing. However, you know as well as I know that Sanctions do not work with Iran. Russia and China will NOT go along with them, and Israel will be force to do what Obama is to cowardly to do, defend itself. How dare Obama attempt to tell Israel not to talk about Iran and Iran's STATED Plans when it comes to Israel. I know that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is a smart guy and someone that understands that patience is a virtue. He has FAR more than I, but I wonder how long his patience will last. Especially dealing with someone of far less intelligence with and CLEAR mission that is NOT in the interest of Israel.
Peter

Sources:
Haaretz - U.S. briefs Israel on new Iran nuke sanctions
The Nation -
US Tells Israel: Iran Has Eight Weeks

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Iran Happy, Israel To Blame, Israel Says Screw You

As well they should.

Hey folks,

This is just completely asinine. According to the BBC - Iran narrowly wins UN nuclear battle Page last updated at 13:23 GMT, Saturday, 29 May 2010 14:23 UK By Paul Reynolds World affairs correspondent, BBC News website

Israel was the big loser in the nuclear review conference in New York - and Iran the big winner.

The cause of nuclear non-proliferation was haltingly served in that the conference did reach a consensus, unlike the last time, and a number of watered-down measures were agreed to seek ways of strengthening the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). But overall, there was not the decisive strengthening that some states wanted.

Instead, governments rallied round one objective - the concept of a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East. This was first called for 15 years ago but until now neglected.
And what is anyone doing to ensure that Iran does not accomplish it's goal to create Nuclear Weapons with the INTENT to USE them against Israel and US?

To its annoyance, Israel found that the US did not block a proposal to hold a one-off conference in 2012 on setting up such a zone. In addition Israel was named for not being a party to the treaty and for not having its nuclear activities under international inspection. Being named like this is always regarded as a diplomatic defeat.

It will produce further soul-searching about the relationship between Israel and the US administration of President Barack Obama, which has often been tense and which will now be more so. Israel has already denounced the agreement as "hypocrisy".
As I keep telling you, Obama is no friend to Israel. He is too busy cosying up with our Enemies.

Mr Obama came out with a statement afterwards that spoke of the US being "strongly opposed" to efforts to "single out Israel" but he did not use the veto available to him.
Idiot. Why not use the Veto? Because he AGREES with those that hate us, and want Israel to just go away.

Whether the conference will be held is debatable (conditions are already being attached) and whether it will do anything practical is doubtful. Israel opposes any nuclear-free zone until there is a comprehensive peace. So does the US.
Obama could have Vetoed it. But didn't.

Iran prepared

Arab countries, led skilfully by Egypt, managed to manoeuvre the US into agreeing. Washington did not want to be blamed for wrecking the conference. It would have undone much of the goodwill that Mr Obama has engendered over the past year through his efforts to reduce the American stockpile of nuclear weapons and to reconfigure US nuclear policy.

On the other hand, Iran was not named, despite being in violation of instructions both from the IAEA, which administers the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and the Security Council that it should suspend the enrichment of uranium. Instead there were a couple of references to countries not being in compliance and since Iran is the only such state, Iran is meant. But it is not named. Iran would have blocked the necessary consensus if it had been.

{Sigh}

So it is no surprise that Israel said "Screw You." Is it? I would have. Also according to the BBC - Israel rejects Middle East nuclear talks plan
Israel says it will not take part in a conference aimed at achieving a nuclear-arms free Middle East, proposed at a UN meeting in New York.

Nearly 200 nations, signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), backed plans for the meeting in 2012.

In a document agreed at the talks, Israel was singled out for criticism.

Israel, which has not signed the NPT, dismissed the document as "deeply flawed" and "hypocritical".

"It ignores the realities of the Middle East and the real threats facing the region and the entire world," the Israeli government said in a statement quoted by the AFP news agency.

"Given the distorted nature of this resolution, Israel will not be able to take part in its implementation."

I really want you to think about this. You move into a neighborhood, the property of your Grandparents. A few years later, someone forms a Homeowners Association. I HATE Homeowner Associations. But they decide that your neighbor is rightfully owed your Property, and that YOU are the Problem, yet, they would love it if you came to the meeting and defended yourself.

Now you already know that your one neighbor that was your friend has moved out, replace by someone that is always siding with your other neighbor that wants you moved out and or dead, so they can have your property. They are even actively engaged in creating a method to eliminate you. No one is trying to stop them. You already know that the Homeowners Association's goal is against your betterment. So what do you do. You say "Screw you." Why bother?

The UN is anti-Semitic. Obama and Crew are anti-Semitic. No one seems real interesting in stopping Iran from Nuking up. So why bother? I'm with Israel on this one. Benjamin Netanyahu's main objective HAS to be for the People of Israel. Israel has to protect Israel, because it is clear that they can no longer rely on US. It really is just that simple.
Peter

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Testing For Obama Starting Early?

Biden, make that Vice President Biden, told us this would happen.

Hey folks,

Remember what Biden said? He said that the Obama Administration would be tested within the first six months. He also BEGGED the Liberal Loony Base to stick with them, because they would not think that they were doing the right thing in the way they respond to it.

Well, we had the elections. The House and the Senate remain in strong control of those that wanted to surrender in Iraq. To declare defeat. The Socialist spouting Obama got elected President. You know, the guy that said he would meet with Little Hitler without preconditions. So what is happening in the world? Reuters - Hamas fires heavier rockets at Israel

GAZA (Reuters) – Hamas Islamists fired their longest-range rockets at a southern Israeli city Friday after an Israeli air force attack on their Gaza stronghold, in the 11th day of skirmishes threatening a five-month-old truce.

A statement from the armed wing of the Islamist group said Hamas fired 5 five 1960s-era, Soviet-made Grad rockets at an Israeli town, the longest range weapon they have claimed to shoot at the Jewish state.

Israeli rescue services said five rockets struck the southern coastal city of Ashkelon but caused no casualties. The Grad has a maximum range of 25 km (15 miles).

Palestinian medical workers said two Hamas fighters were wounded in a morning strike by the Israeli air force, which an Israeli military spokesman said was ordered in response to a Hamas rocket attack.

Hamas said it fired 8 shorter-range Kassam rockets in response, aimed at the city of Sderot.

Two hit the town causing damage to buildings, Israeli police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said. One Israeli was treated for shrapnel wounds, and a number of people were treated for shock.

"Fortunately there were no casualties but there was a lot of damage," said Micha Ben Alain, whose kibbutz near Sderot was hit. "Windows were smashed and doors were torn apart."

Right-wing Israeli lawmakers called on Israel to end the truce and step up operations against Hamas, including strikes on the group's leaders, Army Radio reported.

The fighting is stepping up. Heavier weapons are being used. Back on May 20, 2008, I posted This What A Difference A Year Makes I told you about Obama and a speech he gave to a pro-Israel crowd.

Sen. Barack Obama said Friday the use of military force should not be taken off the table when dealing with Iran, which he called "a threat to all of us."

Speaking before a pro-Israel crowd at a downtown hotel, Obama also repeated his call for a phased pullout of U.S. troops from Iraq and strongly backed a strong U.S. relationship with Israel.

Iranian leader 'reckless' While he was being attacked in Washington, Obama was in friendly territory in Chicago as he appeared at a forum attended by 800 members of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, an influential pro-Israel lobby. He received a standing ovation from the crowd and a hug from one of the group's leaders.

Obama said global leaders must do whatever it takes to stop Iran from enriching uranium and acquiring nuclear weapons. He called Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad “reckless, irresponsible and inattentive” to the day-to-day needs of the Iranian people.

The Iranian “regime is a threat to all of us,” Obama said.

But He also said this.

"Iran, Cuba, Venezuela — these countries are tiny compared to the Soviet Union. They don't pose a serious threat to us the way the Soviet Union posed a threat to us."

So the test will be, WHICH OBAMA will respond to this of situation when he takes the reigns. The Terrorist are counting on the Kumbaya Obama. We NEED the "use of military force should not be taken off the table when dealing with Iran, which he called "a threat to all of us." Obama. Only time will tell.
Peter

Sources:
Reuters - Hamas fires heavier rockets at Israel
OPNTalk- What A Difference A Year Makes

Wednesday, April 08, 2009

Israel Stepping Up Defense Because Of Obama

Mixed signals to say the least.

Hey folks,

In Prague, President Obama said this.

"Let me be clear: Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile activity poses a real threat, not just to the United States, but to Iran's neighbors and our allies. As long as the threat from Iran persists, we intend to go forward with a missile defense system that is cost-effective and proven."

OK. But then he goes on the rest of his world trip apologizing to everyone about everything, in essence, blaming America for all the ills of the world. Then he started affirming his unwavering stance of a two state solution for Israel and Palestine, saying that we are not at war with Islam, and declaring that the US and he, "will work with Muslims all around the world."

Of course he was getting some high praise by some of the Muslim World Leaders for this. Some of those same Muslim World Leaders want to wipe Israel off the map, and are actively engaged in seeking the ability to do just that. Then you have our elustrious President telling the world that he wants to get rid of our nukes and show the world that we truly are a leader. GREAT! Of course people like Russia and North Korea will applaud that. Makes us an easier target. "If he wants to see we have got rid of ours, we will take him out and show him some junk and claim we have no more. Snicker, snicker."

So Israel is starting to feel as if America is turning it's back on them. They are stepping up to best defend themselves. According to the AP - Israel tests system to shoot down Iranian missiles By MATTI FRIEDMAN, Associated Press Writer Matti Friedman, Associated Press Writer

JERUSALEM – Israel successfully tested an anti-missile system designed to protect the country against Iranian attack, the Defense Ministry said, perfecting technology developed in response to failures of similar systems during the 1991 Gulf War. The intercept of a dummy missile was the 17th test of the Arrow system, a U.S.-Israeli joint venture. Israeli defense officials said the interceptor was an upgraded Arrow II, designed to counter Iran's Shahab ballistic missile.

Israel has identified Iran as its biggest threat, citing the country's nuclear program and its development of long-range ballistic missiles. Those fears have been compounded by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's repeated calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.

And Obama wants to go have tea and sing Kumbaya with him.

Israel believes Iran is developing nuclear weapons that could pose a threat to its existence. Iran denies that and says its nuclear work is for peaceful purposes such as energy production. Israel has threatened military action, and Iran has said it would strike back, warning last month that Israel's own nuclear facilities were within missile range.

Iran's Shahab-3 missiles have a range of up to 1,250 miles (2,000 kilometers), putting Israel well within striking distance. Iranian officials were not available for comment on the Israeli test.

In a statement, the Defense Ministry said the interceptor shot down "a missile simulating a ballistic threat in especially challenging conditions." It called the test "an important step in the development program and the development of operational abilities to counter the growing threat of ballistic missiles in the region."

Defense Minister Ehud Barak watched Tuesday's intercept from a military helicopter, the ministry said. According to the Israeli Embassy in Washington, Pentagon representatives also were present.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has made the Iranian threat a top priority of his administration, congratulated defense officials for the successful test. "While we are for peace, we will know how to defend ourselves," he said.

Of course. Obama is sending them mixed signals to say the least. While he was on his little world tour, did he stop by? Nope. But he did visit with Muslims. Oh what does THIS mean anyway? Get this.

In an interview Tuesday with CNN, U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was asked how worried he is that Israel, under Netanyahu, will launch a strike to take out Iran's nuclear facilities.

"I don't believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu would do that," Biden said. "I think he would be ill-advised to do that. And so my level of concern is no different than it was a year ago."


Why? Why would he be "ill-advised" to take out the CLEAR threat to his country's very existence? Was that a threat? Did Vice President Biden just threaten Israel? Sure could be portrayed as such.

So I see this as nothing more than a logical step taken by Israel. They are starting to feel more and more like their long time ally, US, will not have their back if someone attacks them. Thank you Obama. Thank you Biden. I actually hope that if they DO find out Iran is closer than we all "think" or better said this way, if Israel finds out that Iran is closer than this Administration is willing to disclose, they DO take out Iran's Nuclear capability. Sad to say, I doubt Obama has the guts, or the willingness to do it himself. Even if they pose a REAL and pending danger.
Peter

Sources:
AP - Obama urges Iran to affirm peaceful nuclear energy
AP - Israel tests system to shoot down Iranian missiles

Friday, June 18, 2010

Obama Gives US Money to Terrorists?

May be hard to hear, but you better hear it.

Hey folks,

Happy Friday. As I have chronicled here over time, Obama is no friend of Israel, and he seems to actually LIKE and ADMIRE those that want to kill us. Well, BG found the following to illustrate the reality of the situation. Not only is Obama cozying up with terrorists, he is giving them OUR money. Get this. According to Scott Wheeler June 16, 2010


Obama Pays Back Political Favor

President Obama has now made the United States an official “state sponsor of terrorism” a designation, applied to other countries, would mean no aid or trade with the US. It is unclear how Obama’s actions will affect our ability to trade with ourselves as a nation.

On June 9, President Obama announced a 400 million dollar aid package to the West Bank and Gaza, which are currently two separate entities; the West Bank under the control of Mahmoud Abbas, a moderate by radical Islamic standards, Gaza is run by the democratically elected Islamic Resistance Movement known otherwise as the terrorist group Hamas. Obama was trying to be sneaky in announcing this “aid package” to Gaza with Abbas present thus conflating the moderate with the radical terrorist group Hamas, a clear attempt to avoid scrutiny of handing over American’s money directly to a terrorist organization that has murdered American citizens. Whatever else you can say about Obama, at least he never forgets his friends. Thanks to the investigative work of Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs we know that in 2007 Obama’s campaign received over 30 thousand dollars in illegal donations from Hamas controlled Gaza.

Curious is the timing of Obama’s announcement. Israel had just taken action against ships attempting to break its blockade of Gaza, which was put into place to stop the flow of weapons and war supplies that Hamas uses to attack Israelis. And Obama joined the rest of the Islamic world in condemning Israel for taking action to defend itself against terrorists who have not only killed Americans and Israelis but have declared that it would drive the Jews into the Mediterranean Sea.

Since 2001, the United States has listed Hamas as a “Specifically Designated Global Terrorist” organization. The sanctions for providing support for a SDGT are harsh.

Even the New York Times, which is as a rule sympathetic to terrorists, stated “The details of how the aid would be used in Gaza remained unclear. Nor was it immediately clear how Mr. Abbas, who has authority in the West Bank but not in Gaza would be able to administer it.”

But, according to the Times, “White House officials said the money would be spent on housing, schools, efforts to provide access to drinking water and other health and infrastructure projects.” Of course, with Americans providing all of their financial needs it frees up Hamas’ other money to buy weapons and afford them more sophisticated means by which to smuggle them into the strip, no more raggedy flotillas for these terrorists.

Obama also used the occasion to attack Israel’s blockade “there should be some way of focusing narrowly on arms shipments rather than focusing in a blanket way on stopping everything and then, in a piecemeal way, allowing things into Gaza.” Even Obama himself acknowledges that supplies still get to the Gazans, Israel just searches the incoming vessels to insure that the cargo isn’t going to be used to kill people. Apparently Obama thinks there is some other magical way to find the weapons among the “humanitarian supplies” other than looking through them. Here’s a thought; how about you get no supplies at all until you stop smuggling weapons and murdering innocent civilians?

The Times reports that international aid organizations “working in Gaza have warned of growing hardship. Deprived of raw materials, local industry has been severely damaged, and the Gaza economy has collapsed.” This account seems to suggest that the poor Gazans have absolutely no control over their situation, the fact is though that they went to the polls and freely elected Hamas agents to run Gaza. These poor victims elected representatives for themselves whose stated objective is to annihilate the Jews. But we should feel sorry for them anyway, Obama and the liberals here tell us the most evil crime in the world is racial discrimination and yet they take our money and give it to people whose sole objective for their existence is to exterminate a race of people. Welcome to Obama’s world.

I reported before the 2008 election that Obama had been endorsed by Hamas leader Ahmed Yousef, who himself had been a Hamas operative inside the United States for years, using several aliases, until I confronted him and informed him that I knew who he was. He denied that he worked for Hamas and then promptly fled the country and two years later turned up in Damascus, Syria as a senior Hamas leader. Obama is either completely ignorant of the war Islamic terrorists such as Hamas are waging against us, or worse. Until we know more I have the unfortunate task of reporting to you that we are now a state sponsor of terrorism.
Now there is something you will not see on the All Barack Channel {ABC} New Barack Channel {NBC} the Clinton News Network {CNN} or the New York Times. But then again, this should be no surprise to YOU. A True OPNer should already know these types of things are going to and ARE happening. As I have been telling you, this IS who Obama is.
Peter

Note: From The Emails is a weekly Segment every Friday, or occasionally anytime, that appears here at the OPNTalk Blog. Please feel free to Email any Articles, Comments, Thoughts, Whatever, that you may like to share to opntalk@gmail.com As always, you never know what you may see here.

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Iran Working On Nuclear Bombs. Really?

I'm so glad the Experts have told us this.

Hey folks,

I'll get to the Cain stupidity tomorrow. You have no idea how much I have been holding back on all this. I'll discuss it tomorrow. Notice very few are covering his remarks? Anyway, this is FAR more important than Herman Cain.

I just told you how Obama and Crew are more concerned about Israel than they are Iran. OPNTalk - US More Concerned About Israel Than Iran? I have told you how China and Russia were opposed to the publication of the IAEA Report. Obama was too, by the way. I told you WHY. Now we have it.

Folks, Obama is no friend of Israel. As we have documented in depth over the past few years. He even completed snubbed snubbed Netanyahu on his last visit to Washington. We know by both Obama's words and actions, that he would rather be freinds with Israels ENEMIES , and ours also, than Israel, a long time Ally and Friend.

We just learned that Obama VOICED his disdain for Netanyahu at the G20 Summit when he thought the Mic was off. When France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy regarded Netanyahu as “a liar” and said this.

"I can’t bear Netanyahu"
Obama chimed in with this.

“You’re fed up, but I have to deal with him every day.”
Is there REALLY any doubt that Israel is getting ready to go it alone? OPNTalk - Israel: Clock Ticking on Iran

Now the "EXPERTS" have finally come out with the TRUTH. According to the AP - UN reports Iran work 'specific' to nuke arms By GEORGE JAHN - Associated Press AP – 10 hrs ago

VIENNA (AP) — The U.N. atomic agency said for the first time Tuesday that Iran is suspected of conducting secret experiments whose sole purpose is the development of nuclear arms, an assessment that draws on 1,000 pages of intelligence and nearly a decade of research.
Which we needed none of. I've been telling you for years EXACTLY what Little Hitler was up to. I have been telling you for years what he SAID his goals are. His actions. His Deeds. The TRUTH. We did not need this report. But I'm glad they finally caught up.

The report by the International Atomic Energy Agency is its most unequivocal yet suggesting that Iran is using the cover of a peaceful nuclear program to produce atomic weaponry. Based on years of trying to probe Tehran's secretive activities, its release will stoke debate on whether it's time to jettison failed diplomatic efforts to end Iran's nuclear defiance and replace them with force.
Iran is NOT peaceful? Iran IS working on Nuclear Bombs. Really?

The 13-page annex to the IAEA's regularly scheduled report on Iran included evidence that suggests the Islamic republic is working on the clandestine procurement of equipment and designs to make nuclear arms.

"While some of the activities identified in the annex have civilian as well as military applications, others are specific to nuclear weapons," the report said.

Among these were indications that Iran has conducted high explosives testing and detonator development to set off a nuclear charge, as well as computer modeling of a core of a nuclear warhead. The report also cited preparatory work for a nuclear weapons test, and development of a nuclear payload for Iran's Shahab 3 intermediate range missile — a weapon that can reach Israel.
Which they successfully TESTED not to long ago. I told you about them as well.

In Washington, officials said the report confirms U.S. suspicions about the military nature of Iran's program, and the Obama administration was readying a range of sanctions and other measures against Iran should the Islamic republic fail to answer questions raised about its nuclear ambitions.

Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev said there was a government directive not to comment until Israel has studied the findings in depth.

But before the report's release, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of a possible Israeli military strike against Iran's nuclear program.

"We continue to recommend to our friends in the world and to ourselves, not to take any option off the table," he told Israel radio.
No doubt. Israel is target ONE. Knowing that Obama will most likely NOT have their back. EVERYTHING better be on the table. EVERYTHING.

That phrase is often used by Israeli politicians to mean a military assault. Israeli leaders have engaged in increased saber rattling recently, suggesting that an attack was likely a more effective way to stop Iran's nuclear program than continued diplomacy.

Iran is under U.N. sanctions for
{Sigh} We know what they are doing. We know that we now have a 1000 page report TELLING Obama and Crew, and the World, what Iran is doing. I'm tired of hearing how our Islamofacist loving President is content on FAILED Sanctions. This goes on to tell you Iran Denies, Russia no comment, yadda...yadda...yadda. Then it tells you how Obama and crew will use it to ask for maybe more Sanctions. You know, those that do not work?

This report needs to be a wake up call folks. People around the World need to WAKE up. Iran WILL not stop until someone stops them. They WILL get a NUCLEAR BOMB! They WILL USE IT! This was the Truth yesterday. It is Today, and Tomorrow? BOOM!

Little Hitler and Iran's Nuclear Quest needs to be stopped. PERIOD. NOW. They are working on Nukes? I'm so glad the Experts have told us this. Now what is our illustrious Leader going to do about it. Ignore it. Give Iran more time with pointless Sanctions? Or back our Friends and Allies? Hm?
Peter

Sources:
The Globe and Mail - Worldview: Obama, Sarkozy trade gripes about Netanyahu in open mic gaffe by Paul Koring
AP - UN reports Iran work 'specific' to nuke arms