Federal Judges Can Void The Constitution?

Have you HEARD about this ANYWHERE?

Hey folks,

This is just plain scary. Have you heard about this?

United States Supreme Court Will Soon Issue a Landmark Decision on the Validity of the Constitution PR Newswire

ATLANTA, Nov. 13, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution. The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. The decision should be rendered by the end of the year.

Unless The Supreme Court acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.

The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court by Grandfather Windsor are:

Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?

Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?

Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

These questions are presented in three separate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus filed with The United States Supreme Court the first week of November 2010 (appeal numbers to-be-assigned).

Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it all up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride in Niagara Falls, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay over $400,000 in legal fees. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

Windsor believes that the federal courts and nine federal judges violated the Constitution, the Due Process Clause, and the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.

Windsor says: "I have discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia, the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches and violating the Constitutional rights of parties who have the misfortune of appearing in their courts."

Windsor has now tossed the hot potato right square in the laps of the justices of the Supreme Court. By filing mandamus petitions rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court is forced to deal with Windsor's allegations of corruption in the federal courts.

Grandfather Windsor hopes for the best but fears for the worst: "I hope The Supreme Court is decent, honest, and cares about the Constitution and the citizens of the United States. However, I am sorry to say that at this point, I suspect the corruption goes all the way to the top. My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I have said to The Supreme Court that the issues can all be boiled down to one question: Is The United States Supreme Court prepared to stop the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia from functioning like common criminals?"

Windsor says: "If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books."

The Supreme Court may render its decision before the end of the year. It's one retired grandpa against the United States government.

Now you might say that you do not care about this. What does this case of one Grandpa have to do with you? A LOT. It's not necessarily JUST this case. As with a case like Roe Vs Wade.

In September 1969, one Woman, known at the time as "Jane Roe" filed a Lawsuit against Dallas County District Attorney Henry Wade. She, AKA, Norma L. McCorvey, pregnant with her third child, wanted an Abortion. She first attempted to scam her way into a Legal abortion by claiming she was Raped, but that was a lie. So after some doing, she got a couple of Bleeding heart Liberals to take the case. She won.

Just like this, you could say, so? What does that have to do with me? Well, NOW we know. Don't we? Now based on THAT case, it has been determined, wrongly, that a Woman has a "Right" to Murder her own Child at whim and Will. This case can have a MUCH farther reaching effect.

That Case dealt with One Woman, now ALL Women are under this precedent until Sanity prevails and it is Repelled. However, THIS case, if the Supreme Court Rules AGAINST William M. Windsor, they will set a precedent. In essence, they will indeed say that Federal Judges, which of course will include the Highest Court, will no long be bond by the Constitution. In essence, they are ruling on the Rule of Law itself. Let's Hope that they do the Right thing here.

We already have had Presidents, Administrations, and a Congress, that have circumvented, ignored, and completely VIOLATED the Constitution. Now we have a Case before the Supreme Court that could make the Constitution the great, unwavering, solidified Law it is, or null and void all together. This may not seem like much now, but how will it look in 20, 30, 40 years? That is the question we need to ask.
Peter

Elena Kagan IS Obama

This should be no surprise.

Hey folks,

{Sigh} What do I think of Elena Kagan? She is an Idiot. She has no experience. She is a Liberal loon. The Media is attempting to pass her off as one of the most intelligent people in the room when the evidence points to otherwise. She IS Obama.

Seriously folks, she is a joke. she should be laughed all the way out of Washington. the MMD {Mass Media Drones} should have a FIELD DAY with her. Not attempt to paint a false portrait of who she is NOT. But we all know true journalism is dead, and they simply repeat whatever they are told to. True or not.

Even someone that KNOWS her well, claims he has no idea where she stands on issues. He has no idea WHAT experience she has for this job. He is seriously at a loss. His name is Clinton News Network's own Jeffrey Toobin. You know, CNN? The Network who's Co-Founder even thinks has become nothing more than a joke. But this guy KNOWS her. Jeffrey Toobin writes this.

I met Elena on our first day of law school at Harvard in the fall of 1983. We were introduced by a mutual friend, and we were assigned to the same section—the group of a hundred and forty or so students who took our first-year classes together. Elena and I and two other students (joined occasionally by others) formed a study group, and we worked together for the entire year. In our second and third years, we were on law review together. When she ran for president of the law review, I was a sort of unofficial campaign manager for her. She finished second.

Elena danced at our wedding in 1986. When my wife, Amy, and I bought our first apartment, Elena’s father was our lawyer; he had a small real estate law firm in New York. (He died in 1994.) When Elena’s mother died two years ago, I visited the family as they sat shiva in the apartment where she grew up on the West Side.

We are old friends. So my initial reaction to her nomination is a simple one: happiness for her. As I cover her nomination, and, if she is confirmed (as she likely will be) her career on the Court, readers should know this history and decide what difference, if any, it makes. For starters, from now on, I’ll be calling her Kagan, not Elena.

So this guy KNOWS her. She even danced at his wedding. so what does he think of her? As far as her nomination to the highest Court in the land? He is confused.

Judgment, values, and politics are what matters on the Court. And here I am somewhat at a loss. Clearly, she’s a Democrat. She was a highly regarded member of the White House staff during the Clinton years, but her own views were and are something of a mystery. She has written relatively little, and nothing of great consequence.

He wraps it up with this.

But on the Court, Kagan will have to do something she’s not done before. Show her hand. Develop a clear ideology. Make tough votes. I have little doubt she’s up to the job, but am less clear on how she’ll do it.

So being her friend, and a paid member of the Obama State Run MMD, he is furthering the notion that she is highly intelligent. But even he, a "long time friend" of hers has no idea what she did to qualify her for this Nomination. but then again, Obama is the least qualified person to ever win the Presidency. He has no experience whatsoever. Look where we are now.

We DO know where she stands. She is a Socialist. She hates the Constitution. She wants to remake this country. This is one of those little things she has written about that her friend doesn't want you to know about. You know, "nothing of great consequence." So don't worry about reading it. She IS Obama. The White, Female version of Obama. Of course he would nominate her. She will also be easily controlled.

As for her intelligence? Seriously. I have a higher than normal intelligence level. Not bragging, just a fact. I know many that are truly FAR more Intelligent than I. How about you? Let me ask you this. How many of you, have EVER, gotten home, or to work, got out of your car, leaving the keys in the ignition and the vehicle running, and leaving it running all night long? She has. Richard Epstein, another Professor at the school she was at said this.

“A couple of times when she was so focused on her work, she would park her car and leave it running overnight,”

THAT is a sign of intelligence? Most of the time, when people turn 50, they do something like that, people start asking about Alzheimer's or some other kind of brain dysfunction. I know, I know, this happened when she was younger. That's even worse. Then maybe she is simply an Idiot. Either way, it is hardly a sign of intelligence. But then again, NO ONE has shown us ANY PROOF whatsoever that Obama is anything more than an Idiot. So why should we expect anything different for Ms. Elena Kagan? We should not. What we should expect is a false, media created image of who they want you to believe she is. Just like Obama.
Peter

Sources:
The New Yorker- Elena Kagan’s Nomination
New York Times - A Climb Marked by Confidence and Canniness

IWA For Sunday 041110

Who is Amy Klobuchar?

Hey folks,

Let's wrap things up with the IWA. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Who is Amy Klobuchar? A Liberal Loon Democrat. She is pro-choice, supports LGBT rights, favors Socialism. She LOVES Obamacare. She said this.

"This bill is a beginning, not an end, and I will continue my effort to ensure that reform serves the best interests of Minnesota."

She is critical of the Iraq War. She is one of the many Loons that opposed President Bush's plan to increase Troop levels in Iraq in January 2007, claiming it would not work. She Voted for a Bill to set time limits in this addition of Troops which President Bush Vetoed. She then Voted against additional funding for Iraq without such time limits, saying she "simply could not stomach the idea of using our soldiers as bargaining chips."

She opposes free trade agreements that some perceive to cause a loss of jobs in the U.S. However, she has wavered on her opposition on such trade agreements since her election. A current trade agreement with Peru may achieve her support on grounds of expanded labor and environmental protections, even though they contain the same language of past trade agreements. She is a big "Chicken Little Crowd" Member, AKA Greenie. She DID Vote in FAVOR of the controversial "Protect America Act", but then voted against granting Legal Immunity to Telecom Corporations that cooperated with the NSA warrantless surveillance program. You get the point.

Some are currently trying to pass her off as a "Moderate Liberal." They are saying that she would be a GREAT replacement for Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens. Who announced his retirement just the last week or so. She is hardly a Moderate. She is a Loon. A Socialist, and a radical. She even went to the Superbowl with the Obamas. She IS a Perfect pick for Obama. However, even she knows that she is to Loony Left for some to give her a free pass.

ABC's The Note Blog posted the following.

Klobuchar: No Room for 'Wise Slovenian' Like Me on Supreme Court
April 09, 2010 5:39 PM

ABC News' Teddy Davis and Matt Loffman report:

Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D) name has been floated in the media as a possible replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

But during a Friday appearance on MSNBC's "Hardball," she once again jokingly dismissed the chances of it ever happening because of controversial speeches she has given during her political career.

"There you go. Shermanesque. As I said the other day on Rachel's show, I couldn't get it because of my past speeches, you know, all the times, remember Sotomayor – the 'wise Latina woman'? You can't imagine how many times I referred to myself as a 'wise Slovenian woman,' Chris. It's over," said Klobuchar.

Klobuchar, who is well-known in Washington for her comedic timing, was elected to the US Senate in 2006. Previously, she served as the chief prosecutor for the most populous county in Minnesota.

On top of any strikes that may come from being a "wise Slovenian," Klobuchar is damaged as a Supreme Court prospect by coming from a state, Minnesota, which has a Republican governor, Tim Pawlenty.

{Laughing} Yes those evil Republicans. Folks, Of course she is on the top of the list. If Obama DOES select her, you will hear these past speeches all over the place. Congratulations Sen. Amy Klobuchar, you ARE the Idiot of the Week. It was NOT the 'wise Latina Woman' comment that was offensive. It was the fact it was a RACIST comment, claiming that White Men were less wise. Then again, but you JOKING about this, yes I understand you were joking, but you joking about this, could ALSO be seen as Racist. What you are ACTUALLY saying is, anyone that opposed Sotomayor, did so out of Racism. So, anyone that opposes you, well? Maybe not Racism, since you are White. Maybe Chauvinism? I know, it couldn't possibly be your history or extreme views. Right?

Peter
Sources:
ABC The Note Blog

Swine Flu Update 050409

UPDATE: CDC Update: H1N1

Hey folks,

Happy Monday to you. First up, your CDC Update for Monday 050409, then my thoughts on who Obama will pick for the Supreme Court. Lot's of talk about it yesterday, as I'm sure there will be until the day he announces his choice. It will be a Liberal though. That much all can agree on. More on that in a second.

Here is your Swine Flu Update for today

CDC continues to take aggressive action to respond to an expanding outbreak caused by novel H1N1 flu.

CDC’s response goals are to:

Reduce transmission and illness severity, and Provide information to help health care providers, public health officials and the public address the challenges posed by this emergency.

CDC continues to issue and update interim guidance daily in response to the rapidly evolving situation. CDC will issue updated interim guidance for clinicians on how to identify and care for people who are sick with novel H1N1 flu illness. This guidance will provide priorities for testing and treatment for novel H1N1 flu infection. The priority use for influenza antiviral drugs during this outbreak will be to treat people with severe flu illness.

On May 3, CDC is scheduled to complete deployment of 25 percent of the supplies in the Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) to all states in the continental United States. These supplies and medicines will help states and U.S. territories respond to the outbreak. In addition, the Federal Government and manufacturers have begun the process of developing a vaccine against the novel H1N1 flu virus.

Response actions are aggressive, but they may vary across states and communities depending on local circumstances. Communities, businesses, places of worship, schools and individuals can all take action to slow the spread of this outbreak. People who are sick are urged to stay home from work or school and to avoid contact with others, except to seek medical care. This action can avoid spreading illness further.

Alabama 1
Arizona 18
California 26
Colorado 4
Connecticut 2
Delaware 10
Florida 3
Illinois 3
Indiana 3
Iowa 1
Kansas 2
Kentucky* 1
Massachusetts 7
Michigan 2
Minnesota 1
Missouri 1
Nebraska 1
Nevada 1
New Hampshire 1
New Jersey 7
New Mexico 1
New York 63
Ohio 3
Rhode Island 1
South Carolina 15
Tennessee 1
Texas 40 1
Utah 1
Virginia 3
Wisconsin 3
TOTAL (30) 226 cases 1 death

Now with 3 cases here in Florida, my Niece's school started making calls about washing hands, covering your mouth when coughing and of course, if you are sick, STAY HOME and get check out. As aways, until the end of this thing, check back tomorrow for the latest.

Be right back with my take on Obama's soon to be pick for the Supreme Court.
Peter

Democrats Want Lackey Judge

Told you so.

Hey folks,

Yes, as I told you before, with Supreme Court Justice David Souter retiring, because he has become fed up with the White House, we still do not know what that means, the big news making it's way around the Morning News Shows yesterday was Senators speculating who is Obama going to choose.

Some on the Right are complaining about Obama's wording in talking about this. They say that him talking about them being able to connect with average Americans, understanding "Justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnotes in a case book," and that he wants them to have a "quality of empathy" that this means he is setting the tone for a FAR LEFT Liberal activist Judge. One that may or may not even have experience.

Of course he is. He actually said this.

"I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnotes in a case book. It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of peoples' lives, whether they can make a living, care for their families, whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation."

"I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with peoples' hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes."

So what does that say to you? To me, I share their concerns. There has been much talk about a Woman or a Minority. There is speculation that he is looking at Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in NY. Remember her? Sotomayer was on the panel that rejected a new trial for the former radical activist, Judith Clark who is imprisoned for being the getaway driver in a 1981 Rockland County armored-truck robbery. The incident left three people dead, including two police officers.

"See? She is not a Radical. She did not advocate from the bench. She would make a great Judge. She was even appointed by President George H W Bush."

However, The Wall Street Journal called her a "liberal." The Free Congress Foundation called her a "Judicial Activist." Amnesty groups pushed for her confirmation in 98. She was confirmed on October 2, 1998 in a 67-29 vote, and she received her Commission on October 7.

She is a big Amnesty Advocate and a big Anti-Life Advocate. {Pro-Choice} So she fits the Obama Agenda. Some other names being bantered around? Jennifer Granholm who is the Michigan Governor, Deval Patrick who is a friend of Obama and the Massachusetts Governor, and Cass Sunstein who is a University of Chicago Law Professor, and an Obama friend. None of which are Judges. This is want some Democrats want.

"I would like to see more people from outside the judicial monastery, somebody who's had some real-life experience, not just as a judge," Leahy, D-Vt., said on ABC's "This Week."

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Said this

"It would be good to get people who know something besides wearing a black robe," on NBC's "Meet the Press."

The general consensus is pretty much set though, it will be a Liberal. Why would you think it wouldn't be. It will be someone that will help Obama further his agendas. Souter showed himself to be more Liberal than not, so I do not think that this one pick of Obama, will really change the court that much, but it may be a sign of what is to come in the future.
Peter