Global Warming: The Other Side

Part Two GWBS Just Silly

Hey folks,

Welcome back. So so far, at least 16 major claims made in AR4 the IPCC report saying that we are killing the Planet, which they also won the Nobel Prize for, have been proven to have come from Environmental Groups rather than Scientists. None of it is true. It is nothing more than a SCAM. What I have been telling you for years. Check this out.

THE HAGUE (AFP) – The Netherlands has asked the UN climate change panel to explain an inaccurate claim in a landmark 2007 report that more than half the country was below sea level, the Dutch government said Friday.

According to the Dutch authorities, only 26 percent of the country is below sea level, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will be asked to account for its figures, environment ministry spokesman Trimo Vallaart told AFP.

The incident could cause further embarrassment for the IPCC, which recently admitted a claim in the same report that global warming could melt Himalayan glaciers by 2035 was wrong.

IPCC experts calculated that 55 percent of the Netherlands was below sea level by adding the area below sea level -- 26 percent -- to the area threatened by river flooding -- 29 percent -- Vallaart said.

"They should have been clearer," Vallaart said, adding that the Dutch office for environmental planning, an IPCC partner, had exact figures.

Correcting the error had been "on the agenda several times" but had never actually happened, Vallaart said.

The spokesman said he regretted the fact that proper procedure was not followed and said it should not be left to politicians to check the IPCC's numbers.

The Dutch environment ministry will order a review of the report to see if it contains any more errors, Vallaart said.

The IPCC's 938-page Fourth Assessment Report spurred politicians around the world to vow action with its warning that climate change was on the march, but the body has faced fierce criticism over the glacier mistake.

Glaciologists have discredited the Himalaya claim, which is being withdrawn, and the controversy has given fresh ammunition to climate sceptics.

No evidence could be found to show the claim had been published in a peer-reviewed journal and reports in Britain have said the reference came from green group the WWF, who in turn sourced it to the New Scientist magazine.

Then I got this in the Emails just this morning.

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, in an hour-long television documentary titled "Global Warming: The Other Side," presents evidence that our National Climatic Data Center has been manipulating weather data just as the now disgraced and under investigation British University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit. The NCDC is a division of the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Its manipulated climate data is used by the Goddard Institute of Space Studies, which is a division of the National Aero- nautical and Space Administration. John Coleman’s blockbuster five-part series can be seen here.

The Coleman documentary presents research by computer expert E. Michael Smith and Certified Consulting Meteorologist Joseph D’Aleo. During the 1960s and into the 1980s, the number of stations used for calculating global surface temperatures was about 6,000. By 1990, the number of stations dropped rapidly to about 1,500. Most of the stations lost were in the colder regions of the Earth. Not adjusting for their loss made temperatures appear to be higher than was in fact the case.

According to Science & Environmental Policy Project, Russia reported that CRU was ignoring data from colder regions of Russia, even though these stations were still reporting data. That means data loss was not simply the result of station closings but deliberate decisions by CRU to ignore them in order to hype their global warming claims. D’Aleo and Smith report that our NCDC engaged in similar deceptive activity where they have dropped stations, particularly in colder climates, higher elevations or closer to the polar regions. Temperatures are now simply projected for these colder stations from other stations, usually in warmer climates.

Mounting evidence of scientific fraud might make little difference in terms of the response to manmade global warming hysteria. Why? Vested economic and political interests have emerged where trillions of dollars and social control are at stake. Therefore, many people who recognize the scientific fraud underlying global warming claims are likely to defend it anyway.

Power, Control, and Money. I have been telling you about this for years now. Whomever wrote this is right. This is what they are doing as we speak. They are trying to get you to forget what you KNOW, what you SEE, and just accept what they are telling you.

Automobile companies have invested billions in research and invest-ment in producing "green cars." General Electric and Phillips have spent millions lobbying Congress to outlaw incandescent bulbs so that they can force us to buy costly compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFL). Farmers and ethanol manufacturers have gotten Congress to enact laws mandating greater use of their product, not to mention massive subsidies. Thousands of major corporations around the world have taken steps to reduce carbon emissions including giants like IBM, Nike, Coca-Cola and BP, the oil giant. Companies like Google, Yahoo and Dell have vowed to become "carbon neutral."

Then there’s Chicago Climate Futures Exchange that plans to trade in billions of dollars of greenhouse gas emission allowances. Corporate America and labor unions, as well as their international counterparts have a huge multi-trillion dollar financial stake in the perpetuation of the global warming fraud. Federal, state and local agencies have spent billions of dollars and created millions of jobs to deal with one aspect or another of global warming…

Yet another nail in the ‘global warming’ coffin that is already mighty full of nails.

I highly encourage you to check out the Video over at KUSI News - Global Warming: The Other Side

Folks, it is and has always been about Power, Control, and Money. It has also always been a SCAM. What people seem to not realize is that this, which will redistribute wealth, and control your Private everyday lives, will also create two VERY distinctive Classes.

Class one, Rush, Al Gore, the Senators, Congress People, Bill Gates, Soros, ETC. Those that can and will simply PAY for "Carbon Offsets" and BUY the right to say that they are "Carbon Free." Then, they will simply live the way they always have. Fly around, drive whatever, live in their homes that burn more energy than 30 homes in a year.

Class two, You? Well, you will be forced to follow the laws they pass. You can not afford Carbon Credits? Fine. You can live in a tent and ride a bike to work. And you will LIKE it. You are saving the planet. You will be considered a "Good Citizen" and we will take care of you. Just like Healthcare, and every other need we will determine for you.

This is what these people crave. Absolute Power. They are Socialists. Then you have the fact of all this money being thrown around. Others jump on board and say, "Hey, if I do this or say that, I will get a few million? Why not? Who cares?"

Meanwhile, none of it is REAL. It doesn't exist. There is NO threat. They know this. That is why they care about other things. You know, like taking over Private Industries, Healthcare, and controlling the Financial System. If GW WAS real, NOTHING ELSE WOULD MATTER!

Seriously, what good is the Economy if we are all dead? What would be the point in Healthcare if we will all parish in 10 years? Who would care about ANYTHING else? NOTHING else would matter. Nothing.

Be right back for Part THREE. Yes, Part three.
Peter

Sources:
Times Online - UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim
National Post - Activist-scientists cooked the books to foster
UK Guardian - Strange case of moving weather posts and a scientist under siege
UK Daily Mail- Leaked emails reveal that 'climategate' scientist 'hid' flaws in key global warming data
Canadian National Post - Wheels fall off global-warming hysteria
AFP - Netherlands adds to UN climate report controversy