Our Enemies Love The ISG Report

Hey folks,

Yes I know it’s Sunday. Yes the IWA is coming up. But THIS is too important to not comment on. OH how I want so badly to move away from this "Surrender Monkeys" report, but, it is far too important to do that right this second. Turns out Iraq calls it an insult, and our enemies love it. What should that tell you? They are even WRITING our news now?

According to the Christian Science Monitor,

"The Jordan Times - a paper with ties to the state, a US ally - hailed the recent ouster of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the ISG's report as a "return to common sense" in its lead editorial. "All of a sudden Washington appears to be heading towards a less bellicose and more cooperative stand on Middle East issues,'' it wrote, praising the report's recommendations to engage Iran and Syria and start a "gradual pullout of its troops to end the occupation.""

Nabil Amr, a top adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, described the report as "excellent," saying he read it as an acknowledgement of Bush administration failures in Iraq and the region.

"The administration must wake up and see the reality on the ground in the Middle East requires a different policy,'' he says."

Of course. They WANT us to leave. They want us to fail. They WANT Iraq. Get this,

"Zbulun Orlev {That is actually Zvulun Orlev, No pic Avail.} of Israel's right-wing National Religious Party labeled the report "unfriendly" to Israel, particularly in its advocacy for engaging Iran and calling for a "land for peace" approach to the problems in the Palestinian territories, which it says are inflaming regional problems.

"We thought after six years of Bush, the policies which Baker represents had died," Mr. Orlev says, referring to ISG co-chair James Baker, who was the secretary of State under President George H. W. Bush, during which time he pushed for a peace deal with the Palestinians.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made a point at a press conference Thursday to say that the report does not necessarily reflect Bush administration policy.

"Israelis know Baker's determination quite well," says Gershon Baskin, co-chair of the Israel-Palestine center for research and information. "If Bush accepts the recommendations, Israelis are going to face pressure they're not used to.""

So the Israelis, our allies, see this report as anti-Semitic, which it is. If we are talking about "talking" to and asking help from someone who said they want to wipe you off the face of the map, that would be fine with YOU?

Then you have this little tidbit,

"One demand has already been articulated. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who makes the final decisions in foreign policy, said US troops must pull out of Iraq before Iran would help reduce the violence: "The occupation of Iraq is not a morsel that the US can swallow," Mr. Khamenei said during a visit by Iraq's president in late November. "The first step to resolve the instability in Iraq is the withdrawal of occupiers from this country and the transfer of security responsibilities to the popular Iraqi government."

The ISG calls for a negotiated settlement with Syria to stop shipping weapons to Hizbullah, the Shiite militant group, and stop allowing Iran to transport weapons across the country to Hizbullah in Lebanon. It calls for Syria's full cooperation in investigating all political assassinations in Lebanon, and to encourage Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist.

In exchange, the ISG recommends that Israel return the Golan Heights to Syria, with an international force on the border that could include US troops, if both countries agree."

I love this following statement. This is the mentality of those that want us to surrender.

"Sure, Iran and Syria may be allowing people to come across their border and providing some arms or money, but the conflict is overwhelmingly about sectarian enmity inside Iraq,'' says Andrew Garfield, a former British military intelligence officer who spent most of last year as an adviser in Iraq and is now a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Washington."

{Laughing} "Sure, Iran and Syria may be allowing people to come across their border and providing some arms or money, but," They are KILLING AMERICAN SOLDIERS!!! Sure but, let’s ask them for help. They say SURE, we’ll help, KILL YOU!! Idiots.

Notice this little note on the bottom of this ridiculous article? Allow me to point it out for you,

"* A stringer in Tehran, Iran, contributed to this report."

A "Stinger" =A contestant, player, or other person ranked according to skill. One of "Little Hitler’s" drones helped write this article. Got to love it.

How does Iraq itself feel about this "Surrender Monkeys" report? According to the AP,

"The Iraqi president said Sunday the bipartisan U.S. report calling for a new approach to the war offered dangerous recommendations that would undermine his country's sovereignty and were "an insult to the people of Iraq."

President Jalal Talabani was the most senior government official to take a stand against the Iraq Study Group report, which has come under criticism from leaders of the governing Shiite and Kurdish parties.

He said the report "is not fair, is not just, and it contains some very dangerous articles which undermine the sovereignty of Iraq and the constitution.""

He goes on to say,

"I believe that President George Bush is a brave and committed man and he is adamant to support the Iraqi government until they've reached success," he said. He said setting conditions was "an insult to the people of Iraq."

STOP! Wait a second! Now he did it. Someone should tell President Talabani that complimenting President Bush is a sure way to get more people to disagree with him. {Smile}

"If we can agree with the U.S. government to give us the right of organizing, training, arming our armed forces, it will be possible in 2008 (for U.S.-led forces) to start to leave Iraq and to go back home," he said.

"If you read this report, one would think that it is written for a young, small colony that they are imposing these conditions on," Talabani said. "We are a sovereign country."

Then you have this other interesting little tidbit of information in reference to our enemies loving this report,

""Syria's ruling party's Al-Baath newspaper urged Bush to take the Iraq Study Group's report seriously because it would "diminish hatred for the U.S. in region."

STOP AGAIN! That IS the Liberal looney agenda and goal, "have the world love us."

"But if it failed to pick up the positive signals either in the report or in the Syrian welcome of what the report has contained, it (the U.S.) would remain drowned in the quagmire and the situation in the region and the entire world would remain unstable," the newspaper said."

More quotes from President President Jalal Talabani according to the AFP,

"As a whole, I reject this report," he said. "I think that the Baker-Hamilton report is not fair and not just, and it contains dangerous articles which undermine the sovereignty of Iraq and its constitution."

"We smell in this report the attitude of James Baker in the aftermath of the war in Kuwait," Talabani said.

So the "Good Guys" see this report as we, the intelligent ones whom chose to see reality, as a worthless piece of garbage, anti-Semitic, and could even possibly constitute AIDING the enemy. The enemy "Bad Guys" LOVES it. So what should that tell you?
Peter

Sources;
AP-"Talabani calls Iraq report 'dangerous'"
AFP-"Talabani blasts 'insulting' US report on Iraq"
Christian Science Monitor-"Arab world welcomes Iraq Study Group report"