Thursday, September 27, 2007

Democrat Presidential Hopefuls Just Admitted They Have Been Lying

Hey folks,

This is too good. All these calls by the Democratic Presidential hopefuls, and the LWL leadership in Congress, for Bush to end the war now, and bring the troops home NOW, are nothing but politics and lies. They JUST admitted this. Get this, from the AP -Dems can't make guarantee on Iraq troops By BETH FOUHY, Associated Press Writer

The three leading Democratic presidential hopefuls conceded Wednesday night they could not guarantee that all U.S. combat troops would be gone from Iraq by 2013, the end of the next president's first term in office.

That’s all you need to know folks. The next time you, and I know you are out there, feel like putting on the gear, rolling a joint and waving signs on the street corner saying “Bush Lied People Died, No blood for oil, Bring our troops home know” or the next time you hear traitors Pelosi, Reid, Murtha, whoever, saying they were elected in 06 to end this war, you NOW KNOW they are lying to you.

Not only did the Presidential wannabes tell you that they are not going to bring the troops home as soon as they are elected, they told you they may not bring them home AT ALL for the duration of their entire term.

"I think it's hard to project four years from now," said Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois in the opening moments of a campaign debate in the nation's first primary state.

Well, yes, even more so that you are clueless.

"It is very difficult to know what we're going to be inheriting," added Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

"I cannot make that commitment," said former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina.

Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson provided the assurances the others would not.

Now talking about clueless. Some are still pandering to the insane looney base.

"I'll get the job done," said Dodd, while Richardson said he would make sure the troops were home by the end of his first year in office.

The opening question of the two-hour debate plunged the eight contenders into the issue that has dominated all others in the race for the White House.

With the primary season approaching, all eight have vied with increasing intensity for the support of anti-war voters likely to provide money and organizing muscle as the campaign progresses.

AKA Soros, and MoveOn.org.

Edwards said his position on Iraq was different from Obama and Clinton, adding he would "immediately drawn down 40,000 to 50,000 troops." That's roughly half the 100,000 that Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, has indicated could be stationed there when President Bush's term ends in January 2009.

He has no plan on HOW, because he cannot do it. Now would he.

Edwards sought to draw a distinction between his position and that of Clinton, saying she had said recently she wants to continue combat missions in Iraq.

"I do not want to continue combat missions in Iraq," he said.

Clinton responded quickly, saying Edwards had misstated her position. She favors the continued deployment of counterterrorism troops, not forces to engage in the type of combat now under way.

You know this is just a myth right? You know that this is a completely idiotic statement right? If our troops are there, they will be in combat. What, are they suppose to just be there “Gathering evidence on terrorist? Ignore when they are bombed and shot at? Of course not.

To my LWL and anti war friends out there. They just told you the truth. They will not do what they call on the President to do. They just told you that THEY will NOT bring the troops home either. They just told you a vote for them, is no different than a vote for the Republican hopefuls when it comes to Iraq.

So now you need to ask yourself, what is the difference in their positions on domestic issues. Do you what higher taxes? Vote for Democrats. You want open boarders and Amnesty? Vote for the Democrats. You want to destroy Healthcare in this country? Vote for the Democrats. You want your freedoms taken away and a “Shared society”, or a “We're in this together” society? Vote Democrats in. You what security, more of your own money, and the America you know and love, you CANNOT vote Democrats in. Also please remember this. Even though they do not what you to think about this, BUSH is NOT running. You do not have to worry about him being re-elected.

This ought to be fun to watch the spin. The LWL HAVE to hate the fact they just told them, we were lying to you the whole time. {Smile}
Peter

Source:
AP -Dems can't make guarantee on Iraq troops

No comments: