But some of them want YOU to believe it.
Hey folks,
Yes. They know. They know that GW {Global Warming} is complete and utter BS {Uh, Bad Science}As I keep telling you, more and more REAL Scientists are coming out and calling GW or "Man-made Climate Change" what is it. A SCAM. Nothing to back it up. Nothing to PROVE the point the Man is killing the planet. NOTHING.
Now I started to go back into the archives here at the OPNTalk Blog and pull out the points I have been making and the PROVE to back them up, and you know what, WAY TO MUCH to re-post. Seriously. The evidence to the contrary of Global Warming is BLINDING. The fact there are still some that spout outdated talking points in the face of all the evidence to the contrary is mind boggling. Polar Bears, CO2 being a pollutant, the UN-fact of us even warming any more, ETC. Got some time? Check the archives. It's all there.
Just this part may I posted this. White House Counsel Memo On CO2 Myth, Green House Gases, The Economy. I said this.
"Not so fast though. As I told you before, more and more people are starting to question this. REAL Scientists are coming out by the droves and saying that CO2 is NOT a pollutant and there really is no MAN-MADE Global Warming at all. As a matter of fact, we are now in a cooling cycle.
Well, they are not alone, According to this memo that was brought to light by Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, during a CSPAN live hearing, the White House Counsel is now attempting to back pedal a bit. He was addressing this 9 page memo with the EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson.
That's right folks, the White House counsel put together a memo saying everything about CO2 is a myth, that there was no science in the formulation of this. They say that it was pure politics.
I have the memo. Here it is. Read it for yourselves.
See the Video of the exchange and the full Memo itself HERE.
Now the EPA's own Scientists are saying that it is completely Bogus. Not stopping Obama though. Not stopping the Kooks. Michelle Malkin had a GREAT piece about this last week.
The free market-based Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington (where I served as a journalism fellow in 1995) obtained a set of internal e-mails exposing Team Obama’s willful and reckless disregard for data that undermine the illusion of “consensus.” In March, Alan Carlin, a senior research analyst at the Environmental Protection Agency, asked agency officials to distribute his analysis on the health effects of greenhouse gases. EPA has proposed a public health “endangerment finding” covering CO2 and five other gases that would trigger costly, extensive new regulations of motor vehicles. The open comment period on the ruling ended this week. But Carlin’s study didn’t fit the blame-human-activity narrative, so it didn’t make the cut.
On March 12, Carlin’s director, Al McGartland, forbade him from having “any direct communication” with anyone outside his office about his study. “There should be no meetings, emails, written statements, phone calls, etc.” On March 16, Carlin urged his superiors to forward his work to EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, which runs the agency’s climate change program. A day later, McGartland dismissed Carlin and showed his true, politicized colors:
“The time for such discussion of fundamental issues has passed for this round. The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision… I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office.”
Contrary comments, in other words, would interfere with the “process” of ramming the EPA’s endangerment finding through. Truth-in-science took a backseat to protecting eco-bureaucrats from “a very negative impact.”
In another follow-up e-mail, McGartland warned Carlin to drop the subject altogether: “With the endangerment finding nearly final, you need to move on to other issues and subjects. I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research etc, at least until we see what EPA is going to do with Climate.”
But, of course, the e-mails show that EPA had already predetermined what it was going to do – “move forward on endangerment.” Which underscores the fact that the open public comment period was all for show. In her message to the public about the radical greenhouse gas rules, EPA administrator Lisa Jackson requested “comment on the data on which the proposed findings are based, the methodology used in obtaining and analyzing the data, and the major legal interpretations and policy considerations underlying the proposed findings.” Ms. Jackson, meet Mr. Carlin.
The EPA now justifies the suppression of the study because economist Carlin (a 35-year veteran of the agency who also holds a B.S. in physics) “is an individual who is not a scientist.” Neither is Al Gore. Nor is environmental czar Carol Browner. Nor is cap-and-trade shepherd Nancy Pelosi. Carlin’s analysis incorporated peer-reviewed studies and, as he informed his colleagues, “significant new research” related to the proposed endangerment finding. According to those who have seen his study, it spotlights EPA’s reliance on out-of-date research, uncritical recycling of United Nations data, and omission of new developments, including a continued decline in global temperatures and a new consensus that future hurricane behavior won’t be different than in the past.
But the message from his superiors was clear: La-la-la, we can’t hear you.
In April, President Obama declared that “the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over.” Another day, another broken promise. Will Carlin meet the same fate as inspectors general who have been fired or “retired” by the Obama administration for blowing the whistle and defying political orthodoxy? Or will he, too, be yet another casualty of the Hope and Change steamroller? The bodies are piling up.
Malkin is author of the forthcoming “Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies” (Regnery 2009).
Meanwhile, Obama and Crew continue pushing their agenda. While some of Obama's OWN people are warning him not to base his Cap and Trade on non and or faulty science, he is flying around the world touting his agenda. He is not having much luck with it though. At the G8, China and India said "Screw You." As a matter of fact China went home. You know, they have people to kill and all. They do not have time to play games with the stupid American President. They are not going to put their Economy in jeopardy over a SCAM. They wouldn't mind if we do. But then again, Obama basically said they do not have to. Remember this?
"At a time when the economy worldwide is still deep in recession and we've seen a significant drop in global trade, I think we have to be very careful about sending any protectionist signals," Obama said in an Oval Office interview reported by The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post.
So he just excused others from doing their part to help save the planet, based on a bad economy. But YOU? The single Mom working two jobs? The young family just starting off. The Retired folks on a set income? SCREW YOU! You WILL pay higher energy costs. You WILL watch this "Kill The American Economy Bill," increase unemployment, and put unfair and completely unnecessary burdens on ALL Americans. To save the planet of course.
Folks, this is complete nonsense. They KNOW it is. They know there is no threat. But there IS a lot of power to be had. There IS a lot of control to be taken. There IS a lot of money to be made. This is what the whole "Green Movement" is all about. What it has ALWAYS been about. The truly sad thing? There are still many in this country that has bought into the SCAM.
Peter
Sources:
Michelle Malkin - EPA’s game of global warming hide-and-seek
OPNTalk - White House Counsel Memo On CO2 Myth, Green House Gases, The Economy
OPNTalk - Obama Excuses Others From "Global Warming" Due to Bad Economy
Hey folks,
Yes. They know. They know that GW {Global Warming} is complete and utter BS {Uh, Bad Science}As I keep telling you, more and more REAL Scientists are coming out and calling GW or "Man-made Climate Change" what is it. A SCAM. Nothing to back it up. Nothing to PROVE the point the Man is killing the planet. NOTHING.Now I started to go back into the archives here at the OPNTalk Blog and pull out the points I have been making and the PROVE to back them up, and you know what, WAY TO MUCH to re-post. Seriously. The evidence to the contrary of Global Warming is BLINDING. The fact there are still some that spout outdated talking points in the face of all the evidence to the contrary is mind boggling. Polar Bears, CO2 being a pollutant, the UN-fact of us even warming any more, ETC. Got some time? Check the archives. It's all there.
Just this part may I posted this. White House Counsel Memo On CO2 Myth, Green House Gases, The Economy. I said this.
"Not so fast though. As I told you before, more and more people are starting to question this. REAL Scientists are coming out by the droves and saying that CO2 is NOT a pollutant and there really is no MAN-MADE Global Warming at all. As a matter of fact, we are now in a cooling cycle.
Well, they are not alone, According to this memo that was brought to light by Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, during a CSPAN live hearing, the White House Counsel is now attempting to back pedal a bit. He was addressing this 9 page memo with the EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson.
That's right folks, the White House counsel put together a memo saying everything about CO2 is a myth, that there was no science in the formulation of this. They say that it was pure politics.
I have the memo. Here it is. Read it for yourselves.
See the Video of the exchange and the full Memo itself HERE.
Now the EPA's own Scientists are saying that it is completely Bogus. Not stopping Obama though. Not stopping the Kooks. Michelle Malkin had a GREAT piece about this last week.
The free market-based Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington (where I served as a journalism fellow in 1995) obtained a set of internal e-mails exposing Team Obama’s willful and reckless disregard for data that undermine the illusion of “consensus.” In March, Alan Carlin, a senior research analyst at the Environmental Protection Agency, asked agency officials to distribute his analysis on the health effects of greenhouse gases. EPA has proposed a public health “endangerment finding” covering CO2 and five other gases that would trigger costly, extensive new regulations of motor vehicles. The open comment period on the ruling ended this week. But Carlin’s study didn’t fit the blame-human-activity narrative, so it didn’t make the cut.
On March 12, Carlin’s director, Al McGartland, forbade him from having “any direct communication” with anyone outside his office about his study. “There should be no meetings, emails, written statements, phone calls, etc.” On March 16, Carlin urged his superiors to forward his work to EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, which runs the agency’s climate change program. A day later, McGartland dismissed Carlin and showed his true, politicized colors:
“The time for such discussion of fundamental issues has passed for this round. The administrator and the administration has decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision… I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office.”
Contrary comments, in other words, would interfere with the “process” of ramming the EPA’s endangerment finding through. Truth-in-science took a backseat to protecting eco-bureaucrats from “a very negative impact.”
In another follow-up e-mail, McGartland warned Carlin to drop the subject altogether: “With the endangerment finding nearly final, you need to move on to other issues and subjects. I don’t want you to spend any additional EPA time on climate change. No papers, no research etc, at least until we see what EPA is going to do with Climate.”
But, of course, the e-mails show that EPA had already predetermined what it was going to do – “move forward on endangerment.” Which underscores the fact that the open public comment period was all for show. In her message to the public about the radical greenhouse gas rules, EPA administrator Lisa Jackson requested “comment on the data on which the proposed findings are based, the methodology used in obtaining and analyzing the data, and the major legal interpretations and policy considerations underlying the proposed findings.” Ms. Jackson, meet Mr. Carlin.
The EPA now justifies the suppression of the study because economist Carlin (a 35-year veteran of the agency who also holds a B.S. in physics) “is an individual who is not a scientist.” Neither is Al Gore. Nor is environmental czar Carol Browner. Nor is cap-and-trade shepherd Nancy Pelosi. Carlin’s analysis incorporated peer-reviewed studies and, as he informed his colleagues, “significant new research” related to the proposed endangerment finding. According to those who have seen his study, it spotlights EPA’s reliance on out-of-date research, uncritical recycling of United Nations data, and omission of new developments, including a continued decline in global temperatures and a new consensus that future hurricane behavior won’t be different than in the past.
But the message from his superiors was clear: La-la-la, we can’t hear you.
In April, President Obama declared that “the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over.” Another day, another broken promise. Will Carlin meet the same fate as inspectors general who have been fired or “retired” by the Obama administration for blowing the whistle and defying political orthodoxy? Or will he, too, be yet another casualty of the Hope and Change steamroller? The bodies are piling up.
Malkin is author of the forthcoming “Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies” (Regnery 2009).
Meanwhile, Obama and Crew continue pushing their agenda. While some of Obama's OWN people are warning him not to base his Cap and Trade on non and or faulty science, he is flying around the world touting his agenda. He is not having much luck with it though. At the G8, China and India said "Screw You." As a matter of fact China went home. You know, they have people to kill and all. They do not have time to play games with the stupid American President. They are not going to put their Economy in jeopardy over a SCAM. They wouldn't mind if we do. But then again, Obama basically said they do not have to. Remember this?
"At a time when the economy worldwide is still deep in recession and we've seen a significant drop in global trade, I think we have to be very careful about sending any protectionist signals," Obama said in an Oval Office interview reported by The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post.
So he just excused others from doing their part to help save the planet, based on a bad economy. But YOU? The single Mom working two jobs? The young family just starting off. The Retired folks on a set income? SCREW YOU! You WILL pay higher energy costs. You WILL watch this "Kill The American Economy Bill," increase unemployment, and put unfair and completely unnecessary burdens on ALL Americans. To save the planet of course.
Folks, this is complete nonsense. They KNOW it is. They know there is no threat. But there IS a lot of power to be had. There IS a lot of control to be taken. There IS a lot of money to be made. This is what the whole "Green Movement" is all about. What it has ALWAYS been about. The truly sad thing? There are still many in this country that has bought into the SCAM.
Peter
Sources:
Michelle Malkin - EPA’s game of global warming hide-and-seek
OPNTalk - White House Counsel Memo On CO2 Myth, Green House Gases, The Economy
OPNTalk - Obama Excuses Others From "Global Warming" Due to Bad Economy
NOTE: Reminder, New Email opntalk@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment