Monday, November 10, 2008

Obama And Executive Orders

BIG I told you so.

Hey folks,

Here we go. Get use to Back Room Deals. He has not even taken office yet and Obama is talking about getting moving with his RADICAL agenda. He is coming right out and letting you know, what Obama wants, Obama will get. Screw the Congress. Screw the people. It's all about Obama.

Remember when Hillary was all but guaranteed to step in and take over, she was talking about the use of Executive Orders. I even posted a whole article on them.

"Quite simply put, Executive Order equals what the President wants, the president gets. Congress wanted embryonic stem cell federal funding. The President finds this unethical. He see this as the destruction and murder of innocent lives. I agree. I’m glad he vetoed it. But then he decided to cut to the chase and stop the game playing by congress. Again, not a bad idea. Glad he did it.

Now because the President issued an executive order, funding will be given to those scientist that play by the rules. Does Congress like it? No. Can they do anything about it? No. Here in lays the danger. Notice you have heard no complaining by Congress over this? That is because they can do nothing about it."

According to the article I was commenting on back then.

Executive Orders are controversial because they allow the President to make major decisions, even law, without the consent of Congress. This, of course, runs against the general logic of the Constitution -- that no one should have power to act unilaterally. Nevertheless, Congress often gives the President considerable leeway in implementing and administering federal law and programs. Sometimes, Congress cannot agree exactly how to implement a law or program. In effect, this leaves the decision to the federal agencies involved and the President that stands at their head. When Congress fails to spell out in detail how a law is to be executed, it leaves the door open for the President to provide those details in the form of Executive Orders.

Obama does not like the Constitution anyway. He said so. So this should be no surprise to you folks. According to the AP - Obama to use executive orders for immediate impact By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON – President-elect Obama plans to use his executive powers to make an immediate impact when he takes office, perhaps reversing Bush administration policies on stem cell research and domestic drilling for oil and natural gas.

John Podesta, Obama's transition chief, said Sunday Obama is reviewing President Bush's executive orders on those issues and others as he works to undo policies enacted during eight years of Republican rule. He said the president can use such orders to move quickly on his own.

"There's a lot that the president can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action, and I think we'll see the president do that," Podesta said. "I think that he feels like he has a real mandate for change. We need to get off the course that the Bush administration has set."

No. He is on a power trip. He WANTS to be a Socialist Dictator. He wants to "FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE" this country. {Sigh} Folks, this is why I and so many others have been warning you about this guy. I love this. Get this.

Podesta also said Obama is working to build a diverse Cabinet. That includes reaching out to Republicans and independents — part of the broad coalition that supported Obama during the race against Republican John McCain. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has been mentioned as a possible holdover.

OK reaching across that isle and working with Republicans? What does Traitor Reid think of this?

"He's not even a Republican," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said. "Why wouldn't we want to keep him? He's never been a registered Republican."

{Laughing} Reid is honest at least. He just blew what the AP and other MMD {Mainstreme Media Drones} were trying to pass off as "a diverse Cabinet." As long as they are not Republicans. {Laughing}

Obama was elected on a promise of change, but the nature of the job makes it difficult for presidents to do much that has an immediate impact on the lives of average people. Congress plans to take up a second economic aid plan before year's end — an effort Obama supports. But it could be months or longer before taxpayers see the effect.

Obama could use his executive powers to at least signal that Washington is changing.

"Obama's advantage of course is he'll have the House and the Senate working with him, and that makes it easier," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. "But even then, having an immediate impact is very difficult to do because the machinery of government doesn't move that quickly."

Yeah, that Damn Constitution thing. Then you have to deal with the Will of the people. That can really get in the way of a Dictator Wannabe.

Presidents long have used executive orders to impose policy and set priorities. One of Bush's first acts was to reinstate full abortion restrictions on U.S. overseas aid. The restrictions were first ordered by President Reagan and the first President Bush followed suit. President Clinton lifted them soon after he occupied the Oval Office and it wouldn't be surprising if Obama did the same.

Of course. Forget most Americans WANT them.

Executive orders "have the power of law and they can cover just about anything," Tobias said in a telephone interview.

Bush used his executive power to limit federal spending on embryonic stem cell research, a position championed by opponents of abortion rights who argue that destroying embryos is akin to killing a fetus. Obama has supported the research in an effort to find cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's. Many moderate Republicans also support the research, giving it the stamp of bipartisanship.

Bull.

On drilling, the federal Bureau of Land Management is opening about 360,000 acres of public land in Utah to oil and gas drilling. Bush administration officials argue that the drilling will not harm sensitive areas; environmentalists oppose it.

"They want to have oil and gas drilling in some of the most sensitive, fragile lands in Utah," Podesta said. "I think that's a mistake."

80 percent of the American People WANT This. Do you think Obama will listen to 80 percent? "But he said he was for Drilling." Yeah, and you really believed that?

Two top House Republicans said there is a willingness to try to work with Obama to get things done. But they said to expect Republicans to serve as a check against the power held by Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress.

"It's going to be a cheerful opposition," said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind. "We're going to carry those timeless principles of limited government, a strong defense, traditional values, to the American people."

But with Executive Orders, they can do nothing. Congress can do nothing. YOU, the American people, can do nothing. Just wait folks. He'll do something that even YOU will not like. Give him time. Just do not forget, YOU Voted him in. YOU caused what is about to happen. YOU are to blame for the insanity that will commence in this country. All you that stayed home, or Voted for Obama, YOU did this. As for me? Well, I told you so.

Peter
OPNTalk- Executive Orders
AP -
Obama to use executive orders for immediate impact

2 comments:

kwicker said...

I am totally convinced now that Obama must really be a radical, because you put "radical" in shoutcaps. If you call him that, in capital letters, then it's definitive: he himself has no say in the matter.

It doesn't really matter that Obama's never called himself a "socialist" or "radical." And it doesn't really matter that he's never espoused ideals or acted in ways that are socialist or "radical" or even very extreme (at least not to moderate non-partisans). It doesn't really matter that he campaigned and convinced the majority of moderate, independent voters in this nation on a platform that was not in the slightest socialist or radical.

Nope. None of that matters. Because what matters most is that Peter and other folks at his own extreme end of the political spectrum (who apparently feel that anyone to the left of John McCain is a "socialist") are able to put letters together to spell labels that they can associate with Mr. Obama.

They can even put them in SHOUTCAPS!

This approach of labeling and mocking and making much out of silly unimportant details is surely much more important and persuasive than, say, actual analysis of issues.

The sad thing is, Peter, that I think you have begun to believe your own propaganda. I think the far rightwing has gotten so insular -- with its own special little inbred, self-reinforcing world of special conservative media that continually reassures you that you are a hapless victim of evil "liberals" and "socialists" and whatever -- that it is no longer capable of perceiving the common reality that the rest of less partisan, more moderate humans experience.

I think this election is pretty clear proof of this: voters -- especially moderate and independent voters like myself -- soundly voted against yet more of the same superficial rightwing politics of labelling and fear and hatred and divisiveness. I certainly have my concerns about Mr. Obama -- which I have made very plain here during the past few months. But when I compare Obama's more positive, issue-focused approach to rightwing fearmongering that he is a secret muslim socialist terrorist, there simply is no real contest. With Mr. Obama's election, it feels like the adults are finally back in charge, and we can actually get down to work and deal with real problems -- instead of superficial crap.

Your rant here makes incredible accusations that all assume secret, hidden motives on Obama's part that you have absolutely no evidence for and no way to prove. They simply amount to the same sort of tired, generic demonizing (like calling any conservative a Nazi) that is all too easy to do. For example:

"No. He is on a power trip. He WANTS to be a Socialist Dictator."

What evidence do you have for such an extreme statement? Dictator? All that you say here assumes a secret, hidden motivation unannounced by Obama -- but which yet somehow Peter has access to. Unless you can explain to us what magic you use to get inside Obama's head and find goals that there is absolutely no external evidence for, clearly we are out of the realm of logic here. This is just magical wish-fulfillment.

In other words, this is just simple "Demonizing of One's Perceived Political Other" 101.

Likewise, it is mystifying to any reasonable person how you can berate Obama for planning merely to issue executive order, and try to make the very idea sinister and (somehow, it's not logically very clear) Constitution-defying -- when you never issued a similar rant against Mr. Bush for issuing executive orders. It is hard to imagine someone with less respect for the Constitution than Mr. Bush; I think that having one of the top Constitutional law scholars in the nation (Obama's Constitutional law prof at Harvard calls him that) as President will pretty much ensure that the Constitution is honored more than it has been in a long, long time.

Peter said...

Hey Kwix,

Welcome to the OPNTalk Blog. Glad to have you.

Let's see, WHERE to start? "It doesn't really matter that Obama's never called himself a "socialist" or "radical." No it really doesn't matter. He is what he is if he attempt to do what he said he wants to do. Walks like a duck thing. The fact that he and the Mainstream Media DID convince people he was something he is not, doesn't mean he is. {Smile}

Biggest tax hike in history to provide:

Government run Healthcare.
Government run Education.
Government control in your personal lives AKA GWBS
Bankrupting the Coal Industries and the necessary SKYROCKETING Electric bills.
Redistru,,,huh, make that Spreading the wealth around.
The use of Executive Orders to circumvent any responsibility or any accountability to Congress {Even though they would most likely be with him on most things anyway} The possibility of overriding the Majority of peoples Will.
Silencing Free Speech {Fairness Doctrine}

What do you call these things? I call it what it is. Socialism. Oh, by the way, WHO said anything about him being a Muslim? I never said anything about that. Personally, I couldn't care less if he had Pope next to his name. If he is a Socialist, I will be fighting him every step of the way. White, Black, Jew, Christian, Muslim, doesn't matter to me.

I like Lieberman. I loved Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs, God rest her soul. Actually I like quite a few Democrats. Loons that run the Party right now is a different story.

It was NEVER the Right that used Race, Fear, Hate, or anything the like it. It was the Mainstream Media that was saying that the Right would do it. They never did. It was the Right that simple pointed out the FACTS and TRUTH about Obama. It was the Left that continuously played the Race Card.

As for me saying anything about Bush using Executive Orders, I DID! I do not like Executive Orders at all. They are dangerous. They should be completely abolished no matter who the President is.

No Kwix, I even did a whole article, that I'm pretty sure you saw, where I congratulated Obama and said that we all need to give him a chance. Then I saw THIS about Executive Orders. Do you think he will use an Executive Order to reverse the People's Will to ban Gay Marriage? He is against Gay Marriage, but he said he was against messing with Constitutions as well. So I guess we will have to wait and see.
Peter.