Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Attorney General Eric Holder Not Welcomed By All

Why is this a surprise?

Hey folks,

The big news yesterday afternoon and evening was President Elect Obama picking Eric Holder as the new Attorney General. But just like 30 other Obama appointees, Holder has a past with the Clintons. Well, OK, THAT is an understatement.

Reuters reports it this way.

Before the offer becomes official, Obama's team wants to determine if Holder could win Senate confirmation with broad bipartisan support and clean up a Justice Department wracked by scandals during George W. Bush's presidency, the Democrat said.

THE Democrat said. {Laughing}

"We know we have the votes for Senate confirmation, but we want to make sure he would have broad support so he can make needed reforms," said the Democrat, who declined to be identified because he was not authorized to speak publicly on the issue.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, said of Holder, "He would make an outstanding nominee, and should have the support of senators from both sides of the aisle if President-elect Obama were to choose him for this critical position."

Sure he will. He's a GREAT pick. Involved in the whole Marc Rich thing, when he was the deputy attorney general under President Bill Clinton. But that's not all. The following is a press release by National Legal and Policy Center

FALLS CHURCH, Va., Nov. 18 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), a plaintiff in the successful 1993 lawsuit to open the meetings and records of Hillary Rodham Clinton's health care task force, today criticized Barack Obama for selecting Eric Holder as his Attorney General nominee.

According to NLPC President Peter Flaherty, "Holder is not ethically qualified to serve as Attorney General. His track record is not one of independence or objectivity. Instead, he has been guided by politics and self-interest."

On December 21, 1994, federal Judge Royce Lamberth, who presided over the litigation to open the health care task force, asked Holder, who at the time was the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, to investigate Ira Magaziner for possible perjury and criminal contempt of court. He also suggested that Attorney General Janet Reno should appoint an independent counsel to investigate.

Reno announced on March 3, 1995 that she would not appoint an independent prosecutor. On August 3, 1995 Eric Holder announced that he, too, would not prosecute Magaziner.

Magaziner, who headed up the task force, asserted to plaintiffs in a March 3, 1993 statement that no outsiders, or non-government employees, were taking part in the task force. When task force documents were later produced, it was obvious that dozens of outsiders had taken part. It was not a small point. The presence of outsiders would trigger the Federal Advisory Committee Act, requiring that task force meetings be opened to the public. Magaziner's claim stood for several months. Magaziner and other participants in the task force took no action to expose it or to correct the record.

An example of an outsider was Lois Quam, a vice-president of United Health Care Corporation, a for-profit managed care provider. United Health Care stood to financially benefit from the decisions of the task force, not to mention the reams of inside information to which she would become privy. Quam's participation also helped fuel a controversy directly involving Hillary. The Clintons were investors in a closely held limited partnership called ValuePartners 1, which held a block of United Health Care stock. The partnership shorted a number of health-related stocks including United Health Care. At the time of his death, Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster was in the process of putting the Clinton's health care stocks into a blind trust, a task not completed until July 26, 1994.

At the time, NLPC accused the Clinton administration of a cover-up. Both Reno and Holder were appointed by Clinton, and Reno owed her job to Hillary. Additionally, the Washington Post reported in January of 1995 that Holder was under consideration by Clinton for appointment to a federal judgeship.

Flaherty concluded, "When Reno said she would not appoint a special prosecutor, it was even more appropriate for the case to be handled by the U.S. Attorney with jurisdiction. That was Holder and he should have acted. Holder's failure to pursue Magaziner made a mockery of the law."

A more detailed account of these events can be found in a 1996 book titled The First Lady: A Comprehensive View of Hillary Rodham Clinton by Peter and Timothy Flaherty. The relevant chapter can be read online at
http://www.nlpc.org/view.asp?action=viewArticle&aid=60

NLPC promotes ethics in public life, and sponsors the Government Integrity Project.

Yes folks, The CHANGE we need. Obama is really working hard on CHANGE. Change right back to the Clintons. Whatever happened to new? Whatever happened to CHANGE? Oh he is STILL all about change. Problem is, the CHANGE he is seeking is Socialism. He is putting all the players in place. Make no mistake about it.
Peter

SOURCES:
National Legal and Policy Center
Reuters-
Obama offers Holder attorney general post

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

So when Obama decides to fire all the Republican attorneys and those demopcrats investigating his wrong doings, then it will be okay?

Peter said...

Hey Anonymous,

Welcome to the OPNTalk Blog. Glad you could stop by. Do so often, you never know what you might see here.

As for your statement.

"So when Obama decides to fire all the Republican attorneys and those democrats investigating his wrong doings, then it will be okay?"

In his mind, YES. All will be right with the world. One of the first thing that any good Dictator does is silence his opposition. He get's rid of those that disagree. He controls the media.

Then, sad but true, the Sheeple just go with what they are told. Government takes over their lives and they say GREAT. Free Stuff. I do not have to do anything anymore. The Government will do it for me.

Then a few years later, when they realize what they DO NOT HAVE, FREEDOM, they start looking for it. Why do you think that some many people want to risk life and limb to come here. FREEDOM. Sad that some want to turn this country into that of which these people want to leave.
Peter