The Lord Monckton Report
Hey folks,
Global Warming. They claim computer models tell them what is going to happen. But as I keep telling you, computers can only say what they are told to say. Garbage or incorrect data in, garbage or incorrect data out. I could get a computer to tell you what could happen if you fly into space without a rocket or any kind of protection. I can get the computer to calculate all the possible scenarios. But the one BIG problem is this. YOU CAN NOT DO IT. That will not stop the computer from doing what it does. Computing. Based on the "facts" I have provided.
A little while back, I posted this. Now Politicians Being Threatened “Don’t Call Global Warming a Hoax”
For years they, the Chicken Little Crowd, have been doing their very best to create mass hysteria. They have succeeded to a certain degree. Many people have just become Sheeple that accept the Scaryence as real science. The just accept the fact that this is happening, and that they are to blame. But not enough of you are accepting it. The "cause" has stalled. More and more REAL Scientists are coming out, using real science to debunk the hoax. More and more people are actually starting to listen to the FACTS and deciding that it makes no sense whatsoever. They are starting to question it. Well, they can't have THAT. Why? Because they can't win an intelligent fact and science based argument. They can not win because there is NO real Science in it. There are no PROVABLE facts to back up what they say.
Al Gore has been telling us we only have ten years left for about 15 years. All the predictions are completely wrong, every time the give them. More frequent and severe storms. {Hurricanes} Well, the last two years? Warmer and dryer winters. Well, this year? Fake pictures, fake facts, and fake {Or bought and paid for} Scientist to try to convince you that in the face of REALITY, FACTS, and SCIENCE, Man-made Global Warming is real.
On March 21, 2008 I posted this. Chicken Little Crowd To Attempt To Brainwash More Americans Here are the talking points and use of Psychobabble that they continue to use to get you to believe it, because there is not enough of you buying it. SERIOUSLY! look at the talking points.
The need for a different approach is apparent, environmentalists say.
"We've come up against a brick wall with Americans," says Lee Bodner, executive director of ecoAmerica, an environmental group based in Washington, D.C. Despite Americans' widespread familiarity with global warming, "only a small group are changing their behavior."
There's little research on how to lower people's energy use, but early evidence suggests that many people will change if:
• They think others similar to themselves are jumping on the "green" bandwagon.
• They get frequent positive feedback for effort.
• They feel able to make a difference by taking concrete steps.
• They think their children will be harmed by global warming, or children encourage the family to lead a greener life.
This is to good folks. They are TELLING the rest in the movement. Here are the talking points. Read this again. "You have to convince people that they are not just sheeple. That everyone is doing it, so they should too. Make sure you give them a pat on the back when they do. Make them feel that they are now a good person. That they matter. That they are heroes for doing this. They also have to "believe" that THEY can solve it. Don't be going around telling them that there is no hope. Make sure they know 'we can do it.' If all else fails, tell them their kids are going to DIE. That they will blame them for not doing anything about it. Scare them into submission if need be."
What if the people ask for proof? "Just tell them that all the Scientist agree that it is real, and they are smarter then them, so they need just accept it. Any Scientists that say it's not real are just kooks, or bought off by big oil."
This is the very definition of Scaryence. Scare Science. "Don't forget, if all else fails, the KIDS. Bring up the kids."
Well, now we have even MORE proof that the Computer Models have been wrong, because of data inputted is wrong. The following post is a report completed by Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley. Now some of you Goreties out there will see this and cling to it in an attempt to dismiss this.
"The following article has not undergone any scientific peer review, since that is not normal procedure for American Physical Society newsletters. The American Physical Society reaffirms the following position on climate change, adopted by its governing body, the APS Council, on November 18, 2007: 'Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate.'"
The IPCC report is completely free of peer review. It starts with a premise. Constructs models based on assumptions that give the desired results. Runs the models and, of course, it gets Scarience in line with its beginning premise.
However, Lord Monckton sent a Letter disputing this to the President of APS.
“Trying to duck the usual process of scientific discourse by arguments about peer-review procedures is an ad-hominem approach which is not worthy of the name of science. What has happened is that the usual suspects, instead of ploughing through the (not particularly difficult) math and saying what I got wrong and why (which is what Popper calls the EE or "error-elimination" step in the scientific-method algorithm), decided it would be easier simply to lobby the president of the APS, who - instead of consulting me first - instantly and shamefully crumbled.”
Reported Monckton, “I've had hundreds of emails from Professors, PhDs and other physicists who belong to the APS, on all sides of the "global warming" debate, saying how dismayed they are at the unethical conduct of their President and Council.”
Lastly, added Monckton, “One might ask President Bienenstock what steps the APS took to peer-review its own half-baked Council policy statement on "global warming", which is unadorned by even a single reference to a reputable, peer-reviewed journal."
Now I know it's long and all scientific and all that, but take time to check it out. This COMPLETELY proves Al Gore and the Chicken Little Crowd wrong, and shows GW for what it is. BS.
Peter
Sources:
OPNTalk - Now Politicians Being Threatened
OPNTalk - Chicken Little Crowd To Attempt To Brainwash More Americans
APS - Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered
Lord Monckton- Letter
Global Warming. They claim computer models tell them what is going to happen. But as I keep telling you, computers can only say what they are told to say. Garbage or incorrect data in, garbage or incorrect data out. I could get a computer to tell you what could happen if you fly into space without a rocket or any kind of protection. I can get the computer to calculate all the possible scenarios. But the one BIG problem is this. YOU CAN NOT DO IT. That will not stop the computer from doing what it does. Computing. Based on the "facts" I have provided.A little while back, I posted this. Now Politicians Being Threatened “Don’t Call Global Warming a Hoax”
For years they, the Chicken Little Crowd, have been doing their very best to create mass hysteria. They have succeeded to a certain degree. Many people have just become Sheeple that accept the Scaryence as real science. The just accept the fact that this is happening, and that they are to blame. But not enough of you are accepting it. The "cause" has stalled. More and more REAL Scientists are coming out, using real science to debunk the hoax. More and more people are actually starting to listen to the FACTS and deciding that it makes no sense whatsoever. They are starting to question it. Well, they can't have THAT. Why? Because they can't win an intelligent fact and science based argument. They can not win because there is NO real Science in it. There are no PROVABLE facts to back up what they say.
Al Gore has been telling us we only have ten years left for about 15 years. All the predictions are completely wrong, every time the give them. More frequent and severe storms. {Hurricanes} Well, the last two years? Warmer and dryer winters. Well, this year? Fake pictures, fake facts, and fake {Or bought and paid for} Scientist to try to convince you that in the face of REALITY, FACTS, and SCIENCE, Man-made Global Warming is real.
On March 21, 2008 I posted this. Chicken Little Crowd To Attempt To Brainwash More Americans Here are the talking points and use of Psychobabble that they continue to use to get you to believe it, because there is not enough of you buying it. SERIOUSLY! look at the talking points.
The need for a different approach is apparent, environmentalists say.
"We've come up against a brick wall with Americans," says Lee Bodner, executive director of ecoAmerica, an environmental group based in Washington, D.C. Despite Americans' widespread familiarity with global warming, "only a small group are changing their behavior."
There's little research on how to lower people's energy use, but early evidence suggests that many people will change if:
• They think others similar to themselves are jumping on the "green" bandwagon.
• They get frequent positive feedback for effort.
• They feel able to make a difference by taking concrete steps.
• They think their children will be harmed by global warming, or children encourage the family to lead a greener life.
This is to good folks. They are TELLING the rest in the movement. Here are the talking points. Read this again. "You have to convince people that they are not just sheeple. That everyone is doing it, so they should too. Make sure you give them a pat on the back when they do. Make them feel that they are now a good person. That they matter. That they are heroes for doing this. They also have to "believe" that THEY can solve it. Don't be going around telling them that there is no hope. Make sure they know 'we can do it.' If all else fails, tell them their kids are going to DIE. That they will blame them for not doing anything about it. Scare them into submission if need be."
What if the people ask for proof? "Just tell them that all the Scientist agree that it is real, and they are smarter then them, so they need just accept it. Any Scientists that say it's not real are just kooks, or bought off by big oil."
This is the very definition of Scaryence. Scare Science. "Don't forget, if all else fails, the KIDS. Bring up the kids."
Well, now we have even MORE proof that the Computer Models have been wrong, because of data inputted is wrong. The following post is a report completed by Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley. Now some of you Goreties out there will see this and cling to it in an attempt to dismiss this."The following article has not undergone any scientific peer review, since that is not normal procedure for American Physical Society newsletters. The American Physical Society reaffirms the following position on climate change, adopted by its governing body, the APS Council, on November 18, 2007: 'Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate.'"
The IPCC report is completely free of peer review. It starts with a premise. Constructs models based on assumptions that give the desired results. Runs the models and, of course, it gets Scarience in line with its beginning premise.
However, Lord Monckton sent a Letter disputing this to the President of APS.
“Trying to duck the usual process of scientific discourse by arguments about peer-review procedures is an ad-hominem approach which is not worthy of the name of science. What has happened is that the usual suspects, instead of ploughing through the (not particularly difficult) math and saying what I got wrong and why (which is what Popper calls the EE or "error-elimination" step in the scientific-method algorithm), decided it would be easier simply to lobby the president of the APS, who - instead of consulting me first - instantly and shamefully crumbled.”
Reported Monckton, “I've had hundreds of emails from Professors, PhDs and other physicists who belong to the APS, on all sides of the "global warming" debate, saying how dismayed they are at the unethical conduct of their President and Council.”
Lastly, added Monckton, “One might ask President Bienenstock what steps the APS took to peer-review its own half-baked Council policy statement on "global warming", which is unadorned by even a single reference to a reputable, peer-reviewed journal."
Now I know it's long and all scientific and all that, but take time to check it out. This COMPLETELY proves Al Gore and the Chicken Little Crowd wrong, and shows GW for what it is. BS.
Peter
Sources:
OPNTalk - Now Politicians Being Threatened
OPNTalk - Chicken Little Crowd To Attempt To Brainwash More Americans
APS - Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered
Lord Monckton- Letter
2 comments:
I think George Carlin hit the nail on the head.
See it here if you haven't already seen it.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
I did see that. Man I really miss him. I also like Penn and Tellers take on all this.
Peter
Post a Comment