From The Emails 072508

More Evidence GW is BS 2

Hey folks,

Happy Friday. It's finally here thank God. What a week I have had. I hope yours was much better. Anyway, it is Friday, so it's time to go to the Emails.

OK, I will have to admit something here folks. I KNOW I want to share this information. The problem? I'll call the Sender Mr. BIG. Mr. BIG sent me a PDF of a Project being done by ARTHUR B. ROBINSON, NOAH E. ROBINSON, ANDWILLIE SOON of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, 2251 Dick George Road, Cave Junction, Oregon 97523 [artr@oism.org]It's entitled Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

ABSTRACT A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate. Increased carbon dioxide has, however, markedly increased plant growth. Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future in creases in hydrocarbon use and minor green house gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge. The environmental effects of rapid expansion of the nuclear and hydrocarbon energy industries are discussed.

SUMMARY

Political leaders gathered in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997 to consider a world treaty restricting human production of “greenhouse gases,” chiefly carbon dioxide (CO2). They feared that CO2 would result in “human-caused global warming” – hypothetical severe increases in Earth’s temperatures, with disastrous environmental consequences. During the past 10 years, many political efforts have been made to force worldwide agreement to the Kyoto treaty.

When we reviewed this subject in 1998 (1,2), existing satellite records were short and were centered on a period of changing intermediate temperature trends. Additional experimental data have now been obtained, so better answers to the questions raised by the hypothesis of “human-caused global warming” are now available.

I am completely butchering this study, and it has taken me about two hours to do it. {Smile} I have written this Daily Article about four times now. The Project is 12 pages long. Every time I try to pull something out to highlight, I see something else to add. Basically, the only way for me to do this justice is to post the whole thing. I cannot do that, so I HIGHLY encourage you to check out the link. You will get all the graphs and information, well, you will get the whole thing.

Basically, the bottom line is the SUN controls the earths temperatures. Yes, imagine that. It also PROVES that we are NOT warming to alarming rates. Some of the graphs actually show we are now COOLING. There are NATURAL CYCLES. Where have I heard that before? Hmmm? CO2 is NOT a pollutant. ETC. I love this.

Predictions of catastrophic global warming are based on computer climate modeling, a branch of science still in its in fancy. The empirical evidence – actual measurements of Earth’s temperature and climate – shows no man-made warming trend.

Remember The Lord Monckton Report? Garbage in, garbage out.

Indeed, during four of the seven decades since 1940 when average CO2 levels steadily increased, U.S. average temperatures were actually decreasing. While CO2 levels have increased substantially and are expected to continue doing so and humans have been responsible for part of this increase, the effect on the environment has been benign.

There is, however, one very dangerous possibility.

Our industrial and technological civilization depends upon abundant, low-cost energy. This civilization has already brought unprecedented prosperity to the people of the more developed nations. Billions of people in the less developed nations are now lifting themselves from poverty by adopting this technology.

Hydrocarbons are essential sources of energy to sustain and extend prosperity. This is especially true of the developing nations, where available capital and technology are in sufficient to meet rapidly increasing energy needs without extensive use of hydrocarbon fuels. If, through misunderstanding of the underlying science and through misguided public fear and hysteria, mankind significantly rations and restricts the use of hydrocarbons, the worldwide in crease in prosperity will stop. The result would bevast human suffering and the loss of hundreds of millions of human lives. Moreover, the prosperity of those in the developed countries would be greatly reduced.

Yes folks, in other words, if we continue to surcome to the Envionuts and continue to allow GWBS to continue unchanged, we WILL cause great harm to ourselves and others.

Again, I would love to post this whole thing, but trust me, you have no idea how much time and space that would take. Clink HERE and read it through yourself. WELL WORTH THE TIME TO DO THAT.

As I keep telling you, the whole GWBS is NOT based in any REAL Science. It is Scaryence. {Scare Science, Junk Science, ETC.} More and More REAL Scientist, using REAL Science are coming out and saying that this is all BS. That there is no real evidence to support it. What's it all about then? You guessed RIGHT! Money, power and control. And it IS, just that simple.

Have a great Weekend. See you Sunday.
Peter

Sources:
Emails
OISM - Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
OPNTalk- Proof That GW IS BS

Note: "From The Emails" is a weekly segment in the Friday edition of the OPNtalk Blog. If you care to send in News Articles, Comments, Stories, or anything else you may wish to share, please feel free to send it to opntalk@netscape.net As always, you never know what you are going to see here.