Showing posts with label You Did It. Show all posts
Showing posts with label You Did It. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2007

You Did IT, Again

Hey folks,

''Today, Republicans in the Senate had an historic chance to act in the interests of the American people, but chose not to. Although the immigration bill before the Senate was far from perfect, it would have served as a starting point to address this critical issue for our nation.

During the entire process, newly elected Democratic majorities in both the House and the Senate have been committed to fixing a problem that past Republican Congresses have ignored for years. The President had an obligation to the American people to persuade his fellow Republicans to pass a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill. Unfortunately, he was unable to do so.

Instead, Republicans in the Senate blocked a bill that attempted to fix our nation's dysfunctional immigration system. In doing so, they have failed the American people.

Our immigration system needs to honor the promise of America and recognize the enormous contributions that immigrants make to our nation. But it must do so in a way that makes our nation safer, protects all workers, and restores the rule of law.''
Traitor Pelosi.

First, 15 Democrats voted against it. But of course this is Bush’s fault. {Laughing} Even though he made us all SICK with his obsession of getting this passed.

Make no mistake about it folks. YOU did this. YOU killed this bill, again. Let’s hope they do not try to bring this back again. According to AP -Senate blocks immigration bill By CHARLES BABINGTON, Associated Press Writer 51 minutes ago

The Senate drove a stake Thursday through President Bush's plan to legalize millions of unlawful immigrants, likely postponing major action on immigration until after the 2008 elections.

After the stinging political setback, Bush sounded resigned to defeat.

"Legal immigration is one of the top concerns of the American people, and Congress' failure to act on it is a disappointment," he said after an appearance in Newport, R.I. "A lot of us worked hard to see if we couldn't find common ground. It didn't work."

There was no effort to find common ground. You wanted AMNESTY. We said no. It really was that simple.

The bill's Senate supporters fell 14 votes short of the 60 needed to limit debate and clear the way for final passage of the legislation, which critics assailed as offering amnesty to illegal immigrants. The vote was 46 to 53 in favor of limiting the debate.

Some senators in both parties said the issue is so volatile that Congress is unlikely to revisit it this fall or next year, when the presidential election will increasingly dominate American politics.
Bush appeared glum as he spoke. His negotiators had expressed optimism the vote would go their way — or, at least be closer.

"Congress really needs to prove to the American people that it can come together on hard issues," Bush said. He turned attention to other his other goals in Congress this year, including energy, health care and balanced-budget initiatives.

Break,

Voting to allow the bill to proceed by ending debate were 33 Democrats, 12 Republicans and independent Joe Lieberman, Conn. Voting to block the bill by not limiting debate were 37 Republicans, 15 Democrats and independent Bernard Sanders, Vt. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., did not vote.

They speak.

Sen. Elizabeth H. Dole, R-N.C., said many Americans "don't have confidence" that borders, especially with Mexico, will be significantly tightened. "It's not just promises but proof that the American people want," Dole said.

But the bill's backers said border security and accommodations to illegal immigrants must go hand in hand.

"Year after year, we've had the broken borders," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. "Year after year, we've seen the exploitation of workers."

Because year after year YOU do not FIX them.

After the vote, he said: "It is now clear that we are not going to complete our work on immigration reform. That is enormously disappointing for Congress and for the country." Kennedy, a chief proponent of the bill, said, "we will be back. This issue is not going away."

Let’s hope not. This is why 08 is so important folks. Picture a Looney controlled House and Senate, and a Looney controlled President. I guarantee you this bill will be back faster that you can blink and will pass.

But before the vote, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told colleagues the political climate almost surely would not allow a serious reconsideration until 2009 or later. It would be highly unlikely, she said, "in the next few years to fix the existing system ... . We are so close."

Translation time. Wait until we have no opposition. Look for an even more increased attack on Talk Radio. They are very vindictive people. Watch the push to bring back the Fairness Doctrine. Watch for a push by the Mass Media Drones to attack Republicans running for President and start praising the Democrats. They will now try any and everything they can to get Hillary in there.

Get this.

All the Democratic presidential candidates in the Senate voted to end debate and advance the bill. Among the Republican candidates, only Sen. John McCain of Arizona voted to keep the measure alive. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., at first voted with McCain, but switched his vote when it was clear the bid to end debate would fail.

{Laughing} McCain needs to just hang it up now. He’s done. Brownback? I think he is done now also.

Sessions said on the Senate floor after the vote that Americans "are not mean-spirited, but they are concerned about a lawful system of immigration."

DeMint told reporters, "I think the only victory here is for the American people and, symbolically, a government of the people and for the people. The people responded to this issue in a very emotional and just a very engaged way, which changed the minds of many people here in the Senate."

DeMint said he hoped "we'll proceed with the security and enforcement aspects of this bill, and that will pave the way of how we solve some of the other problems."

ABSOLUTELY!

Great job again. Remember, no matter how they try to spin this. YOU did this. We won this one. If by some odd chance in the near future they try to bring it back? We will beat it again. That is, however, as long as you do not vote the Looneys to retain power, and a Supreme Leader Wannabe into office in 08. If this happens, Amnesty is only the beginning of so much worse. There will be nothing you can do about it then.
Peter

Sunday, June 10, 2007

End of WEEK Roundup

Hey folks,

Since I haven’t been able to be here due to technical difficulties. I have to comment on a few things in the news in abbreviate form. First up, Paris Hilton.

Now as we all know, she thumbed her nose at the law. She is out of control and going down the same road as Anna Nicole Smith. I was truly happy to see that she got jail time. Unfortunately, Sheriff Lee Baca decided to show her favoritism and send her home. By the way, she is STILL being shown favoritism, more on that in a second.

The Judge ordered her back to jail, rightfully so, and the Sheriff SHOULD be fired. He trys to defend this idiotic decision but he really can’t. According to LA Times -Tug-of-war over Hilton raises larger questions By Tami Abdollah and Megan Garvey, Times Staff WritersJune 9, 2007


He cited an undisclosed medical condition as the reason to allow the hotel heiress to switch from a tiny cell to home detention and electronic monitoring, noting that she had served the 10% of her sentence currently being served by most female inmates in the county.

10 percent? Oooooh.

But Friday, an irritated Judge Michael T. Sauer ordered Hilton back to court and said he alone had the power to decide how her sentence was served. Sauer criticized the Sheriff's Department for letting Hilton out without his permission and remanded the 26-year-old multimillionaire — who cried throughout the hearing — back to jail.


As she was led out a side door by deputies, Hilton twisted back toward her parents. "Mom, Mom!" she cried. "It's not right!"

Poor spoiled brat. This may actually SAVE your life. Well, it may have if it would actually happen.


"For decades, where [inmates] were housed and how they were housed was up to the Sheriff's Department," said Stan Goldman, a professor of criminal law and procedure at Loyola Law School. "Now that all may change, thanks to, of all people, Paris Hilton."

It should. The Sheriff also needs to be charged with contempt of court.

Baca defended his decision to let Hilton leave jail and said he was concerned about how Sauer's order — if copied by other judges — would affect the jail system.

"This has the strong potential to set up what will become an untenable precedent because of overcrowding in jail and the lack of adequate housing," Baca said in an interview.

Get this.

A Times investigation found that many of those released early since 2002 had felony convictions and a history of violence and gang activity. Sixteen men released early were later charged with committing murders when they should have still been behind bars, and at least seven have been convicted in those slayings.

Now do not get me wrong. Paris is not a murder. YET. Continuously drinking and drugging along with driving? May become one in the future. Anyway, he cannot defend this. He showed, and continues to do so, her favoritism. What do I mean continues to? According to the AP- Paris Hilton vows to serve jail sentence By ALEX VEIGA, Associated Press Writer

Paris Hilton said Saturday she was "learning and growing" from her time behind bars and will not appeal her 45-day jail sentence for a probation violation in a reckless driving case.

The hotel heiress was at a maximum-security detention center, where she was believed to have undergone medical and psychiatric evaluations to determine the best jail to keep her in.

"Being in jail is by far the hardest thing I have ever done," Hilton said in a statement released by her lawyer, Richard A. Hutton. "During the past several days, I have had a lot of time to think and I believe that I am learning and growing from this experience."

SO why the sudden change? One, she was home for a bit. Able to "curb" the withdraw the started going through after her three day jail stint. We’ll see if a few more days changes anything. But then you have the fact she is NOT in jail.

Although Whitmore wouldn't discuss Hilton's condition, citing privacy laws, Baca indicated at a news conference Friday that it was psychological.

{Laughing} We KNOW she is nuts. But great way to hind the fact of favoritism.

When she went to Twin Towers, Baca said he was placing Hilton in a "better facility for her condition, meaning one that has a more intense form of medical support." He said she'd be kept under close watch to ensure "that there isn't anything harmful done to herself by herself, which is a great concern to me."

Whitmore said she'll be there at least through Sunday.

Twin Towers is equipped to treat acute medical and mental health needs, although inmates in need of more serious attention are moved to a hospital. About 40 inmates are housed per floor, and most of the rooms are designed for one patient at a time.

Hilton is truly living the simple life, in a room Whitmore described as a little more than 100 square feet, with a toilet, sink and "a sliver of a window."

Better than a 12 by 12 cell. What do you think would happen to you if YOU did this. Get caught DWI. Then,

In the months that followed, she was stopped twice by officers who discovered her driving with a suspended license. The second stop landed her in Sauer's courtroom, where he sentenced her to jail.

I bet you would NEVER have been given this treatment. Now she is in a hospital. {Sigh} Life is hard.

Next up, immigration. You DID IT! According to The Contra Costa times -After setback, immigration bill on its last legs in Senate By Dave Montgomery MCCLATCHY WASHINGTON BUREAU Contra Costa Times

Article Launched:06/09/2007 11:39:05 AM PDT WASHINGTON -- With a White House-backed immigration bill on life support in the Senate, the likelihood that Congress can overhaul the nation's tattered immigration system before the onset of the 2008 presidential election year is growing increasingly remote.

The White House, Senate leaders and the bill's supporters insist that the measure can be resuscitated. But thus far they've been unable to bridge a maelstrom of colliding special interests, and the challenges will only intensify as election-year politics complicate their efforts.

"There's a faint pulse there, but it suffered a heavy blow on Thursday," said Daniel Griswold of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank that embraced Bush's call for a comprehensive overhaul of the nation's immigration laws. "It would be a major surprise at this point if it came back to life."

The 627-page bill was pulled from the Senate floor late Thursday after Democratic and Republican leaders failed to resolve a standoff regarding GOP demands to submit additional amendments. The bill's collapse dealt a withering setback to President Bush, who had made a comprehensive restructuring of the nation's immigration laws his top domestic priority.

Good, it needed to be stopped. As for 627 pages? Where did the rest of it go? Anyway, this is a good thing. This was brought to event by YOU. This should tell you something folks. You can do it. You DO matter. Keep this in mind as the 08 elections grow near. YOU have the power to keep America the way you know it to be, or give it up to the LWL and change it into a Socialist country. You have the power.

Like I just pointed out. This is not a hard problem to solve. It is just this easy. Instead of even this new number of 627 pages, how about just 6 things.

1- Secure the boarder first. Both physical and high tech fences.

2- Smart cards. An ID card that using DNA, so that they cannot be faked.

3- Give them a chance to become registered. If they fail to do so, when we catch them, they are gone.

4- Commit a crime after you arrived here? You are GONE.

5- Evaluate all new REGISTERED immigrate case by case. If there is health issues, or criminal histories. Gone.

6- HUGH fines for business owners for hiring those without the ID. Possible Jail time for the Executives.


Up next? Global Warming. I’ll be right back.
Peter

Source;
LA Times -Tug-of-war over Hilton raises larger questions
AP- Paris Hilton vows to serve jail sentence
The Contra Costa times -After setback, immigration bill on its last legs in Senate