Monday, December 22, 2008

Why Bailouts Are Wrong

DO a Good Job, get rewarded. Fail, get fired. It really IS that Simple.

Hey folks,

Good Monday morning to you. You get rewarded for a job well done. If not, you fail or get fired. True story. A few years ago, I started "PC Mailings." The concept is simple. I have information you need. You send me money, I send you the information. Simple right? Not so much. I took the time and the money, to go to Tallahassee and buy the "Rights" to the name. I bought the Licenses I needed. I wrote the Informational Packets. I was ready to go.

The hopes and dreams were filling my head. The Math was sound. If just 100 people wanted the informational packets, I would have made over $2,000 dollars. 1000 people? 10,000 people? You get the picture. I bought advertising for $500.00 for a two week period. I received ONE DOLLAR.

Was the advertising worded wrong? Maybe. Was it placed in the wrong place? Maybe. Could I have continued trying, spending more and more in advertising trying to keep the hope alive? Of course. Did I? Nope. I took the hit and dropped the idea and continued to work for others that PAID me for doing my job.

Now I, like most of you, have worked for others my whole life. EVERY JOB I have ever had, with the exception of one, I excelled and was promoted and rewarded for doing a good job. When I was in Security and Law Enforcement, I was promoted to Sgt and Senior Investigator. When I worked in a kitchen, I became the Night Supervisor. When I was in the Hotel Business, I went from Security, to Night Auditor, to Front Office Manager in one year. I ran a major brand Hotel in NY for six years, and one here in South Florida for three.

Then I worked for a Distribution Company. I could not care less about it. I was there for eight months. I did the minimum of what was asked. I did not show for work, I did not go anywhere. I refused to learn new things, and I pretty much could not have cared if the place burnt down. Did I get rewarded? Nope. I quit and moved on to work for a local City Government.

So the lesson? Do the job you were hired for. Do it well. No matter WHAT the field of endeavor. Get rewarded. Do NOT do the job you are hired for. Get fired or end up leaving on your own. So why does this seem to be a difficult concept?

The AP, Associated Press, conducted an investigation into the Banking Bailouts. What did they find? Get this.

The 116 banks that so far have received taxpayer dollars to boost them through the economic crisis gave their top tier of executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses and other benefits in 2007, an Associated Press analysis found.

That amount, spread among the 600 highest paid bank executives, would cover the bailout money given to 53 of the banks that have shared the $188 billion that Washington has doled out in rescue packages so far.

So these Executives that in essence FAILED to do their jobs. Got caught in the scam that was Fannie and Freddie, are now being rewarded to CONTINUE to fail. Or, I cannot believe I actually agree with him, but I do. As Barney Frank said, they are being bribed to do the job they were hired for.

"Most of us sign on to do jobs, and we do them best we can," said Frank. "We're told that some of the most highly paid people in executive positions are different. They need extra money to be motivated!"

Screw them. Don't do the Job, get the hell out. When I was in Hotel Management, what do you think I said to those that came to me and said, "You know what Pete, I just can't do this anymore. But if you give me a raise, I will try a little harder..?" Yup. I said "Your Fired."

• Lloyd Blankfein, president and chief executive of Goldman Sachs, took home nearly $54 million in compensation last year. The company's top five executives received a total of $242 million.

This year, Goldman's seven top-paid executives will work for their base salaries of $600,000, with no stock or cash bonuses, the company said. Last spring, before Wall Street's staggering losses and layoffs mushroomed, Goldman described its pay plan as essential to retain and motivate executives "whose efforts and judgments are vital to our continued success, by setting their compensation at appropriate and competitive levels." Goldman spokesman Ed Canaday declined to comment beyond that written report.

The New York-based company, after gains last year, on Dec. 16 reported its first quarterly loss since it went public in 1999. It received $10 billion in taxpayer money on Oct. 28.

• Even where banks cut back on pay, some executives were left with seven- or eight-figure compensation that most people can only dream about. Richard D. Fairbank, the chairman of Capital One Financial Corp., took a $1 million hit in compensation after his company had a disappointing year, but still got $17 million in stock options. The McLean, Va.-based company received $3.56 billion in bailout money on Nov. 14.

• John A. Thain, chief executive of Merrill Lynch, topped all corporate bank bosses with $83 million in earnings last year. Thain, a former chief operating officer for Goldman Sachs, came to Merrill Lynch in December 2007, avoiding the blame for a year in which Merrill lost $7.8 billion. Since he began work late in the year, he earned $57,692 in salary, a $15 million signing bonus and an additional $68 million in stock options.

Like Goldman, Merrill tapped taxpayers for $10 billion on Oct. 28.

Look at some of these other numbers.

The records detailing last year's pay packages show that personal financial advice was among the executive perks. Wells Fargo of San Francisco, which took $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money, gave its top executives up to $20,000 each to pay financial planners.

At Bank of New York Mellon Corp., chief executive Robert P. Kelly's stipend for financial planning services came to $66,748, on top of his $975,000 salary and $7.5 million bonus. His car and driver cost $178,879. Kelly also received $846,000 in relocation expenses, including help selling his home in Pittsburgh and purchasing one in Manhattan, the company said.

Goldman Sachs, paying as much as $233,000 for an executive's car and driver, told its shareholders that financial counseling and chauffeurs were needed so executives would have more time to focus on their jobs.

JPMorgan Chase chairman James Dimon ran up a $211,182 tab for private jet travel last year when his family lived in Chicago and he was commuting to New York. The company received $25 billion in bailout funds.

Banks cite security to justify personal use of company aircraft for some executives. But Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., questioned that rationale, saying executives visit many locations more vulnerable than the nation's security-conscious commercial air terminals.

Now we are bailing out Auto Companies? Where is that money going to go? Housing? Did that money go to help YOU. YOU stay in YOUR house? Nope. Private Jets, Big Parties. Big compensations for THEIR Executives. Big rewards for those that CAUSED the problem or ALLOWED it to continue, Like Frank himself. Why is the Auto Industry Different? It's not.

What about a bailout to ME? I started a business that failed. I lost money. I need a consultant, a driver, and someone to fly me places, you know, so I can concentrate more on the business. What would YOU get if I were to get say one Million? Nothing. Just like the Banking, Housing, and Auto industries. You would pay me YOUR tax money, for, well, nothing. But hey, if everyone else is getting bailed out, why not?

So more and more people, including States, Private Business, Public Businesses, and the Little Man on the Moon, are all coming out of the wood work for this "Free Money." Problem is, it's not free, it is YOURS.
Peter

Sources:
AP - AP study finds $1.6B went to bailed-out bank execs

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Congress Raises, Blagojevich Has To Be Thrown Out, We Suffer

Preview For Sunday 122108

Hey folks,

Welcome to the Big Sunday Edition of the OPNTalk Blog. Glad you could make it. Just three more days to go, and Christmas is here. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you all. May you have a blessed day and a joyous fellowship with your friends and family.

OK. Let's get right to it. How are you doing? Financially? Are you OK? You are paying all these taxes, which have to go up to pay for all the freebies that the Government wants to "give you." How about getting a raise at work? Have you asked? Well, they did. They will get it also. YOU will pay for that as well.

Our friend, Irishgodfather, sent me the following.

"A lot of never I'd say.

With the economy in shambles and Americans losing their homes and jobs at record levels, Congress has moved to take drastic measures. For Themselves. The law makers have failed to vote down a $4,700 pay raise beginning in January, increasing their annual salaries to $174,000.

The increase for 535 House and Senate members would cost taxpayers more than $2.5 million. That salary alone, which excludes all other household incomes (spouses etc.), ranks each lawmaker in the TOP SIX PERCENT of ALL American households. Is this real? This disgusting move toward further wealth disparity shows Congress for what they really are - The King's Court."

I couldn't agree more. Talking about arrogance and complete lack concern for the people. Ill. Gov. Blagojevich will HAVE to be thrown out. He is not going anywhere. Get this, from Friday, AP - Ill. Gov. Blagojevich pledges to fight, won't quit

CHICAGO – A combative Gov. Rod Blagojevich served notice Friday that he has no intention of quitting over his corruption arrest, declaring: "I will fight. I will fight. I will fight until I take my last breath. I have done nothing wrong." The forceful three-minute speech marked the first time the former amateur boxer directly addressed the allegations since his arrest 10 days earlier.

Yeah, and he is being attacked for nothing. He also said this.

"Now I know there are some powerful forces arrayed against me. It's kind of lonely right now. But I have on my side the most powerful ally there is, and it's the truth. And besides, I have the personal knowledge that I have not done anything wrong."

So it is simple. You folks in Illinois want him out, you are going to have to throw him out. I really am in a weird mood today. I'm in the Christmas Spirit. I have a whole lot of extra time coming up in the next couple of weeks. Things that would normally tick me off are just really making me laugh.

Anyway, coming right up today?

Holiday Energy Saving Tips
Conversation Between Mr. Government and Joe Liberal
Why Are We Wasting Time and Money
Want Fries With That
IWA For Sunday 122108

Really pay attention to the Energy saving tips. One got my attention right off the bat. Just ten strans of lights run for a few hours a day can add $50.00 to your electric bill? I have to rethink the whole decorading thing. {Smile}

Oh, and by the way, if you live in California, you see someone in need, you may want to re-think helping them out. According to the AP - Calif. Court: Would-be Good Samaritan can be sued

LOS ANGELES – Proving that no good deed goes unpunished, the state's high court on Thursday said a would-be Good Samaritan accused of rendering her friend paraplegic by pulling her from a wrecked car "like a rag doll" can be sued.

California's Supreme Court ruled that the state's Good Samaritan law only protects people from liability if the are administering emergency medical care, and that Lisa Torti's attempted rescue of her friend didn't qualify.

Justice Carlos Moreno wrote for a unanimous court that a person is not obligated to come to someone's aid.

So forget about it. Just let them die. {Sigh} Got to love Califorina. Anyway, we have a lot of ground to cover, so let's get right to it. Get your morning cup of, whatever, and I'll be right back.
Peter

Holiday Energy Saving Tips

From our friends at Energy Tomorrow.

Hey folks,

Since it is the Holiday Season, I thought you might find some of these energy saving tips useful. As I told you last week, I had friends and family that came over and decorated the house. Lights galore. I even have a giant Penguin in my front yard. Now they want to come over and decorate my back porch and yard.

After reading some of these tips by Wendell Cox, I'm starting to rethink the whole thing. {Smile}

Wendell Cox is principal of Demographia, a St. Louis area based public policy firm specializing in demographics, urban policy and transportation.

Mr. Cox recently surveyed the most authoritative studies on energy demand and assessed various energy trends. He maintains that despite recent dips energy demand will continue to rise and we’ll need all the energy we can get to meet it in the years to come.

What do the holidays and our national energy policy have in common? According to Wendell Cox, perhaps more than you think.

Energy demand in the United States typically increases during the holiday season. Just think of every holiday celebration you attend—ovens and other kitchen appliances working overtime, not to mention dishwashers, clothes washers and dryers. And that’s just inside the house. The weeks between Thanksgiving and New Year's are the most heavily traveled of the year—that's a lot of energy use.

The U.S. government predicts that traditional sources of energy—coal, oil and natural gas—will continue to meet the majority of our energy needs well into the future. When the holiday cheer ends and a new Congress and president turn their attention to energy, they must recognize the need for policies that promote all forms of energy and utilize America’s vast resources.

While practicing and conservation are not the whole answer to meeting growing energy demand, it is part of it. Below, please find some holiday energy efficiency tips that will help you make the most of your energy use this holiday season.


Holiday Travel Tips
(Source: EnergyTomorrow.org Fuel Saving Tips)

Keep your tires properly inflated. Underinflated tires can decrease fuel economy by up to one mile per gallon.

Slow down. The faster you drive, the more gasoline your car uses. Driving at 55 miles per hour rather than 65 miles per hour reduces fuel economy by about two miles per gallon.

Avoid jackrabbit starts. Abrupt starts require about twice as much gasoline as gradual starts.

Pace your driving. Unnecessary speedups, slowdowns and stops can decrease fuel economy by up to two miles per gallon. Stay alert and drive steadily, not erratically. Keep a reasonable, safe distance from the car ahead of you and anticipate traffic conditions.

Cooking Tips
(Source: California Energy Commission)

Holiday ham and turkey are usually roasted for hours. Since it's a long, slow cook, there is no need to preheat your oven, even when the recipe suggests it. In fact, unless you're baking breads or pastries, you may not need to preheat the oven at all.

Don't open the oven door to sneak a peek at what is cooking inside. Instead, use the oven light to check the cooking status through the oven window. Opening the oven door can lower the oven temperature by as much as 25 degrees, which increases cooking time and wastes energy.

As long as your oven is on, cook several holiday favorites at the same time.

How to Save Electricity Used by Holiday Lights
(Source: Alliance to Save Energy)

Turn off your holiday lights before you go to bed, or consider installing timers to reduce the amount of time your holiday lights are on. Just 10 strands lit for 13 hours a day can add more than $50 to a monthly energy bill.

Use energy-efficient LED holiday lights, which use 10 percent of the energy of mini lights.

Tips to Save Energy with Electronics
(Source: Department of Energy)

In the average home, 75 percent of the electricity used to power home electronics is consumed while the products are turned off. This can be avoided by unplugging the appliance or using a power strip and using the switch on the power strip to cut all power to the appliance.

For new holiday electronics gifts, unplug battery chargers when the batteries are fully charged or the chargers are not in use.


Hope you find these tips as interesting as I did. Thank you Jane. Again, a very Merry Christmas, and Happy Holidays to all.
Peter

API- Website
Energy Tomorrow- Website

Conversation Between Mr. Government and Joe Liberal

A Possibility of things to come.

"Hey there Joe."

"Oh, Hey Mr. Government. Congratulations on your victory. You know, I Voted for you."

"Yeah, that's great. You know some changes will have to be made right?"

"Yeah of course I do. That's what I Voted for. Change."

"Good, good. Then you understand that we will be taking over the Auto Industry, well, actually just continuing what Bush started. Only we will have to change a few things there also. We will now require them to pay higher taxes, and make cars that are safe for the environment. No more SUVs."

"Great. I'm all about the environment. I want a safe and clean world for my kids and Grand kids to grow up in. Who needs a SUV anyway? Even if the price of gas is down."

"Well Joe, the problem is this. The price of gas is going back up. Here is the reasons why. One, we will tax Big Oil and take their completely insane profits. We will use that money to fund other natural resources, and sources of energy. We will be also reinstating the Drilling ban. If someone decides that they want to open a coal plant, we will simply tax them into Bankruptcy.

You see Joe, High gas prices are actually good. It is a motivator to seek and prefect alternative energy. We do apologize, but your electric bill will skyrocket. This is a good thing as well."

"Well, Mr. Government. I do not like that, but I understand. We all have to make sacrifices."

"Exactly Joe. Besides, our experts say that 77 degrees in the Summer, and 68 degrees in the Winter is good enough and will also save you some money. Since we know that some will fight this, we will be allowing the energy companies to come into your home and control your thermostat."

"Don't you think that is a little intrusive?"

"Not at all Joe. Like you said, we all have to make sacrifices."

"OK. No problem. I can walk around my house Naked in the Summer and put on a sweater in the Winter. But I can not wait until you guys give it to those millionaires. You know, spread the Wealth and all that."

"Well Joe, ACTUALLY, we see that you are doing pretty good. You made $150,000 last year. Yeah I know we said $250,000 was going to be the cut off, but we are not bringing in that much money. So we have lowered the figure. We have to start taking some of your profits also."

"But wait,,,,"

"No, no, no, Joe. Don't start going down that road. Don't be greedy. It's time that you do your Patriotic Duty and help solve this horrible economic mess. You know, we are still trying to fix what Bush and the Republicans screwed up.

Besides, if you really think about it, why would you need to make more? We plan to give you free Healthcare, free Education for your kids, help you with that mortgage of yours, and pretty much take care of whatever you need."

"Well, I guess I understand. I will not have to worry about paying for my kids education. He wants to be a Doctor, and,,"

"Hold on Joe. We have enough Doctors. With us taking over the Healthcare system, it is really those in an office sitting somewhere that will decide what you need and when you need it. You know, like the insurance companies have done for years. No we do not need anymore Doctors right now. What we do need is Plumbers, Electricians, and Carpenters. We need people to learn trades to serve the betterment of all.

Of course, you do realize that if your kids do not want to go to college, that is OK too. Those of us in leadership always need housekeepers, drivers, and people to take care of those everyday things that people like you have to deal with. We are far too busy to worry about shopping, cutting the grass, that sort of thing. They can always work for us."

"No wait a second Mr. Government. If my Son wants to be a Doctor,,,"

{Sigh} "Joe, Joe, Joe. We can not all get want we want. Come on Joe. Don't become a problem. Look at what we are going to give you. You ungrateful slub. Trust me, you do not want to cause a problem for yourself. Allow us to think for you. Allow us to rescue you from yourself and your own stupidity."

"Now wait just a damn second. That is not what I Voted for. You guys were suppose to go after Big Oil, and the other Billionaires out there. You were suppose to give me and my family free money and take care of us. You know, so I don't have to worry about gassing up my car, and paying my mortgage. You guys were suppose to do that.

Now you are telling me that you are taking MY MONEY! You are telling me that you are going to tell me how to live my life and what my kids are going to become? You are telling me that YOU control every aspect of my life? Don't question that?

I guess Rush and Hannity were right about you guys. I guess,,,"

"Why do you think they are off the air Joe?"

"But,,"

"Joe, you really do not want us to look into your back taxes do you? You really do not want us checking your computer to see where it is you have been going, do you? Do you really want a better future for your kids? A better way for YOU? Then just know your role and shut your mouth."

Mr. Government leaves. Joe sits and ponders. He thinks to himself, "How could this have ever happened?"

Peter

Why Are We Wasting Time and Money

Health and Science, if you can call it that, for Sunday 122108

Hey folks,

We're back. OK. Remember when you were a kid. Or for you Parents out there, when you watch these Holiday Classics, Rudolf The Red Nose Reindeer, Island of Misfit Toys, ETC. You remember asking your Parents or your kids ask you, what sex is Rudolf. Right? {sigh}

Well, apparently, some "Experts" have determined that he, and his friends were Females. I'm really not joking here. Kind of wish I was. But according to the AP- Wildlife experts ponder gender of Santa's reindeer

LUBBOCK, Texas – There may be a perfectly good reason why Santa doesn't get lost on his annual Christmas globetrot: His flying reindeer just might be female and don't mind stopping for directions.

The gender of Rudolph and his or her sleigh-hauling friends — the subject of goofy Internet chatter every year around this time — is now being pondered by renowned wildlife experts at Texas A&M University.

"Santa's reindeers were really females, most likely," said Alice Blue-McLendon, a veterinary medicine professor specializing in deer who cites the depictions of Santa's helpers with antlers as the primary evidence. It turns out reindeer grow antlers regardless of gender, and most bulls typically shed their fuzzy protrusions before Christmas.

But Santa's sleigh helpers might also be castrated males, known as steers, said Greg Finstad, who manages the Reindeer Research Program at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

REALLY?

Young steers finish shedding their antlers in February and March, just as non-expecting females do. Bulls generally lose theirs before Christmas, while expectant mothers retain their antlers until calves are birthed in the spring. This allows them to protect food resources through harsh weather and to have enough for developing fetuses, he said.

Sledders most often use steers because they maintain their body condition throughout the winter, he said. Bulls are tuckered out from rutting season when they mate with as many as a dozen females in the months leading up to December. That leaves them depleted and too lean to pull a sleigh or sled through heavy snows, Finstad said.

Many females are pregnant after rutting season, which lasts from summer and into the fall. That would mean long hours of backbreaking work for an expecting Rudolph, as well as Donner, Blitzen, Cupid, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Comet and Vixen.

"You don't hook up your pregnant females to a sled," Finstad said. "That is not good animal husbandry."

I REALLY hope this is a joke.

But other aaspects of the Christmas story support the all-girl sleigh team theory, Blue-McLendon said.

For example, would a boy reindeer really sport a shiny red nose that almost glows?

"Females like accessories," said Blue-McLendon, who in 2003 led the school's cloning of a white-tailed deer. "I think that fits because females like bling. We like shiny stuff."

{Laughing} An EXPERT got one right!

As for the reindeer games, forget the rough antler-smashing stuff. Blue-McLendon suggests a female Rudolph would be more up for "games of wit."

And as for the name, Rudolph could certainly still work.

"Why not?" Blue-McLendon said. "I know women named Charlie."


Did anyone REALLY spend money on this? How about the fact that SANTA is FICTIAL. Rudolf is make believe. None of this is real. When have these expert ever saw a talking Reindeer? Can we maybe use something to analyse the voice patterns to determine sex?

Told you I was in a weird mood today. Be right back.
Peter

Sources:
AP- Wildlife experts ponder gender of Santa's reindeer

Want Fries With That

You Can't Make This Up 122101

Hey folks,

You know, I love Cologne. I really do. I wear it for special occasions, and sometimes just because it is my day off. I prefer Polo, and "Black Suede" that my Niece buys me from AVON.



I also love a good burger. I love Whoppers. I do not eat them often, but every now and then I will find myself driving thru to pick one up.

But I have to admit something here folks. I NEVER, no, not even once, thought "Hey, I know, I'll take this Whopper and smear it all over my body. If I smell like greasy beef, Chicks will dig me."

You think I'm kidding? I'm REALLY not. Seems someone, not sure who, thought it would be a great idea for Burger King to put out a new cologne. One that smells like a Whopper. {Laughing} Sorry, I do not buy the AXE commercials where hundreds of Bikini clad Women are going to come from nowhere and rip your cloths off if you wear it. I most definitely do not buy the fact that Women, MOST anyway, are going to think, "Hey this guy smells like a Whopper, so I want to go home with him."

Well, NOW we know. According to Gothamist Review- New Burger King Flame Cologne Elicits "Universal Disgust" by John Del Signore

When we announced that Burger King had entered the fragrance business with BK FLAME™ – the new men's body spray promising "the scent of seduction with the hint of flame-broiled meat" – your reactions ranged from "I prefer my men to smell like White Castle" to "I want!" But one blogger was bold enough to actually purchase the FLAME™ at Ricky's during his lunch hour and apply it directly to his bare flesh back at the office. The result was predictably revolting: "Everyone gathered around began coughing. And therein lies the horrible secret of Flame: it’s not burger-scented...Try as I might, I could not smell anything related to meat. If you want to know what a Burger King smells like when it’s burning down in a horrible grease fire, though, this is probably as close as you get to the real thing. The acrid, eye-watering scent will not attract anything to you. Even my dog would start choking if it licked this off my wrist...If this is what The King smells like then I don’t want him anywhere near me."

Me neither. Now if they come out with one that smells like French Fries?
Peter

Sources:
Gothamist Review- New Burger King Flame Cologne Elicits "Universal Disgust"

IWA For Sunday 122108

SCREW THE PEOPLE!

Hey folks,

Told you so. This really should be a non-issue. The PEOPLE Voted. The people in California said NO to Gay Marriage. That should be that. But I told you that they were trying hard to find a way to screw the people. Enter California's Attorney General Jerry Brown. According to the AP - Calif. AG urges court to void gay marriage ban

SAN FRANCISCO – The California attorney general has changed his position on the state's new same-sex marriage ban and is now urging the state Supreme Court to void Proposition 8.

Jerry Brown filed a brief Friday saying the measure that amended the California Constitution to limit marriage to a man and a woman is unconstitutional. He says it deprives gay couples of a fundamental right.

WRONG! On so many different levels I might add. One, there is no Right to Marry. There are laws put forth to limit it. But there is NO Constitutional Right to Marry. Second, THE PEOPLE VOTED and nearly EVERYONE sees Marriage as a Union between one Man and one Woman. Third, actually there is no need to discuss further than THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MARRY.

After California voters passed Proposition 8 on Nov. 4, Brown said he would fight to uphold the initiative in his role as attorney general, even though he personally voted against it.

So this guy, who CLEARLY wants the Will of the PEOPLE thrown out, who Voted AGAINST Prop 8, now says he will be fair and wants to challenge YOU?

He submitted his brief in one of the three legal challenges to Proposition 8 brought by same-sex marriage supporters.

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The sponsors of Proposition 8 asked the California Supreme Court on Friday to nullify the marriages of the estimated 18,000 same-sex couples who exchanged vows before voters approved the ballot initiative that outlawed gay unions.

The Yes on 8 campaign filed a brief arguing that because the new law holds that only marriages between a man and a woman are recognized or valid in California, the state can no longer recognize the existing same-sex unions. The document reveals for the first time that opponents of same-sex marriage will fight in court to undo those unions that already exist.

"Proposition 8's brevity is matched by its clarity. There are no conditional clauses, exceptions, exemptions or exclusions," reads the brief co-written by Kenneth Starr, dean of Pepperdine University's law school and the former independent counsel who investigated President Bill Clinton.

The campaign submitted the document in response to three lawsuits seeking to invalidate Proposition 8, the constitutional amendment adopted last month that overruled the court's decision in May that had legalized gay marriage in the nation's most populous state.

Both Attorney General Jerry Brown, whose office is scheduled to submit its own brief to the court Friday, and gay rights groups maintain that the gay marriage ban may not be applied retroactively.

The Supreme Court could hear arguments in the litigation as soon as March. The measure's backers announced Friday that Starr, a former federal judge and U.S. solicitor general, had signed on as their lead counsel and would argue the cases.

Proposition 8's supporters assert that the Supreme Court lacks the authority or historical precedent to throw out the amendment.

"For this court to rule otherwise would be to tear asunder a lavish body of jurisprudence," the court papers state. "That body of decisional law commands judges — as servants of the people — to bow to the will of those whom they serve — even if the substantive result of what people have wrought in constitution-amending is deemed unenlightened."

ABSOLUTELY! So is Government. The people Voted. It is a done deal. But this IS the NEW Liberalism folks. This is the type of thing you have to look forward to with Obama, Pelosi, and Reid. You do not want Amnesty? SCREW YOU. You do not want oppressive taxation? SCREW YOU. You do not want the Government telling you what to drive, the temp you keep your house, what you can and can not do, in the name of saving the planet that is, SCREW YOU.

The cases are Strauss v. Horton, S168047; City and County of San Francisco v. Horton, S168078; and Tyler v. State of California, S168066.

Congratulations Jerry, YOU are the Idiot of the Week. Just the thought that you would listen to these Radicals and attempt to subvert the Will Of the People, shows that you are not worthy of holding the office. You Sir should remember who it is you actually work for.
Peter

Source:
AP - Calif. AG urges court to void gay marriage ban

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Presidential Radio Address for 122108

President Bush Radio Address

President Bush "Good morning. For years, America's automakers have faced serious challenges -- burdensome costs, a shrinking share of the market, and declining profits. In recent months, the global financial crisis has made these challenges even more severe. Now some U.S. auto executives say that their companies are nearing collapse -- and that the only way they can buy time to restructure is with help from the Federal government.

This is a difficult situation that involves fundamental questions about government's proper role. On the one hand, government has a responsibility not to undermine the private enterprise system. On the other hand, government has a responsibility to safeguard the broader health and stability of our economy.

Addressing the challenges in the auto industry requires us to balance these two responsibilities. If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers. Under ordinary economic circumstances, I would say this is the price that failed companies must pay -- and I would not favor intervening to prevent automakers from going out of business.

But these are not ordinary circumstances. In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action. The question is how we can best give it a chance to succeed. Some argue the wisest path is to allow the auto companies to reorganize through Chapter 11 provisions of our bankruptcy laws -- and provide a Federal loan to keep them operating while they try to restructure. But given the current state of the auto industry, my economic advisors believe that bankruptcy could now lead to its disorderly collapse -- sending our economy into a deeper and longer recession.

A more responsible option is to give auto companies an incentive to restructure outside of bankruptcy -- and a brief window in which to do it. My Administration proposed legislation to achieve this, but Congress was unable to get a bill to my desk before adjourning for the year. This means the only way to stave off a collapse of the auto industry is for the executive branch to step in. So yesterday, I announced that the Federal government will grant loans to auto companies, which will provide help to them in two ways.

First, the loans will give automakers three months to put in place plans to restructure into viable companies -- which we believe they are capable of doing. Second, if restructuring cannot be accomplished outside of bankruptcy, the loans will provide time for companies to make the legal and financial preparations necessary for an orderly Chapter 11 process that offers a better prospect of long-term success.

The terms of the loans will require the auto companies to demonstrate how they would become viable. They must pay back all their loans to the government, and show that their firms can earn a profit and achieve a positive net worth. This restructuring will require meaningful concessions from all involved in the auto industry -- management, labor unions, creditors, bondholders, dealers, and suppliers. If a company fails to come up with a viable plan by March 31st, it will be required to repay its Federal loans. Taken together, these conditions send a clear message to everyone involved in American automakers: The time to make the hard decisions to become viable is now -- or the only option will be bankruptcy.

The actions I'm taking represent a step that we all wish were not necessary. But given the situation, it is the most effective and responsible way to address this challenge facing our Nation. By giving the auto companies a chance to restructure, we will shield the American people from a harsh economic blow at a vulnerable time. And we will give American workers an opportunity to show the world once again that they can meet challenges with ingenuity and determination, and emerge stronger than before.

Thank you for listening."

Friday, December 19, 2008

Oh What A Name Makes

From the Emails 121908

Hey folks,

HAPPY FRIDAY! Yes It's Friday, so it's time to go to the Emails. BUT first, I have to say something. From the Emails, and occasionally on other days beside Fridays, I go to the Emails, opntalk@aim.com is the place that you can send me Articles, thoughts, comments, whatever, you think I may be interested in, have commented on, or you just want to say hi. I get all kinds of things. Some I love, some I use, some I couldn't use even if I wanted to. Here is a tip or two.

1- I do not EVER repeat anything in the Emails unless you give me permission to do so. NO PRIVATE INFORMATION is shared unless express permission is given by the sender.

2- If it is an Article, you have a FAR better chance of me using it if you provide the link. I like to go and check it out in context. If I can not verify it, I am less likely to use it.

3- Although I have in the past, I will NOT advertise for no reason whatsoever. I just rejected a spam type comment left on this blog. The times I do advertise or provide links for donations, it is because I truly believe in whatever the case may be. Supporting the troops, protecting kids, ETC. But if you just want me to pop your electric toothbrush, Email me and if we come to some sort of financial agreement, then perhaps.

4- Unless you can PROVE your comments, conspiracies, or accusations, do not bother sending them to me. CT, this one is for you. I would LOVE to use what you sent me. However, I am unable to even come close to verifying ANY of it, therefore I will not use it.

Anyway, it is time to go to the Emails. I love this one. No comment from me is even necessary. BG sent this in, and said this.

"Read this, watch last paragraph or so for the satire ala Saddam Hussein"

The Littlest Eichmanns

The Express-Times of Pennsylvania's Lehigh Valley reports on a kerfuffle in nearby Holland Township, N.J.:

Adolf Hitler Campbell--it's indeed the name on his birth certificate--turns 3 today, and the Campbell family believes the boy has been mistreated. A local supermarket refused to make a birthday cake with "Adolf Hitler" on it.

The ShopRite in Greenwich Township has also refused to make a cake bearing the name of Campbell's daughter, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, who turns 2 in February.

Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, a girl named for Schutzstaffel head Heinrich Himmler, turns 1 in April.

"ShopRite can't even make a cake for a 3-year-old," said Deborah Campbell, 25, who is Heath's wife of three years and the mother of the children. "That's sad."
A director for the Anti-Defamation League in Philadelphia applauded the supermarket's decision.

An Allentown psychologist said the names would cause problems for the children later in life.

Boy, you don't say! What if the Campbell boy grows up and wants to be president one day? He'll never get elected once people realize his middle name was also the name of a brutal dictator!

I have to agree. But nuff said. Have a great Weekend Folks, See you Sunday.
Peter

Note: "From The Emails" is a weekly segment in the Friday edition of the OPNtalk Blog. If you care to send in News Articles, Comments, Stories, or anything else you may wish to share, please feel free to send it to opntalk@aim.com As always, you never know what you are going to see here.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Rick Warren, Pastor, Player, Pawn

Which do you believe? Or does it even matter?

Hey folks,

Happy Thursday to you. Do you remember Rick Warren? For those of you who may not know him, he is an out spoken Evangelical Pro-Life Pastor. Some say he is nothing more than a self promoting, power hungry, fame seeking, scam artist. Others say he is a Man of God, who creates waves because he is bold enough to tell the truth.

I'll be honest with you. I have never sat in his pew. I have never heard a sermon given by him. I have not read any books written by him. I know very little about him. But I do know this. He hosted the Faith Forum with Obama and McCain at the Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California. I posted this back then. McCain Concise, Obama Elusive and Patronizing

Asked at what point he believes life begins, McCain immediately said: “At the moment of conception.”

“I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro-life policies,” he said, after receiving thunderous applause.

Obama, rather, said answering that question would be “above my pay grade.”

Above my pay grade? Can you say he doesn't have the kahunas to answer the question? There were moans after this answer, but I guess he thought that the moans were better than getting booed for being honest.

Obama fought against the ban on LATE Term Abortions. Worse yet, he fought against a bill that would PROTECT babies that were failed attempts of late term abortions. Babies born alive and left to die. On March 30, 2001, he argued this on the floor of the Illinois State Senate.

"Number one, whenever we define a preventable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or other elements in the Constitution, what we are saying is, in fact, they are persons entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a,,a child, a nine month old, that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it were accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean it,,it,,would bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow someone to kill a child."

Of course he couldn't be honest and say, "well, I believe life begins whenever the Mother decides it does." Now he says he would limit abortions in late stages of pregnancy, but we know where he stands on this.

Well, Pastor Rick is back. This time he will be giving the Inaugural Invocation. Of course many are not happy with this. According to The Political Machine - Why Rick Warren's Inaugural Invocation Will Anger Many Conservatives By Matt Lewis Dec 17th 2008 5:18PM

Barack Obama's decision to have Rick Warren deliver the invocation at his inauguration will surely be greeted by many as the triumph of bipartisanship and post-partisan politics.

Predictably, this move is sure to anger some of Obama's base who might view having an Evangelical pro-Life Pastor play such a prominent role in Obama's inauguration as a slap in the face.

I can understand that. We KNOW where Obama stands on Abortion. We now he is for killing innocent lives. The Pro-Choice people were hoping that Obama would protect them and their multi-billion dollar industry.

... But there is another group who is likely to view this move with suspicion: Traditional conservatives. (In fact, a quick perusal of the conservatives I'm following on Twitter confirms this.)

On the surface, one might wonder why conservatives would object to having an evangelical pastor deliver such an important and historic invocation. But for a long time now, conservative opinion has been greatly divided concerning Warren -- and this latest move is merely one more reason for conservatives to be skeptical of his loyalties.

Most TRUE Conservatives, could not care less what his or anyone's "loyalties" are. We are not a big club that hates those not in it. We do not go around kicking people out, or having others PAY to come in. We believe in Right and Wrong. PERIOD. There is no middle ground with TRUE Conservatives. It is a LIFE STYLE. We LIVE what we preach. So do TRUE Christians. At least, that is what we should do.

There are several reasons many conservatives question Rick Warren:

1. Many believe him to be a self-promoting opportunist who is seeking to become the 21st century's version of Billy Graham.

Maybe. But then again, we are all to strive to be Jesus. Someone who even Billy Gram would call greater than he. So just because one seeks to be someone of greatness, does not mean they have evil intents. Then again, he may be a fame seeking, greed driven, scam artist. But I repeat, I know very little about him, therefore I can not judge his intent.

2. As I write this, a debate continues to rage between Michael Gerson style "compassionate conservatives" -- and traditional conservatives who view the term as redundant, and who blame George W. Bush for supporting big government liberal policies. Warren obviously fits into the former camp. And while he is pro-Life, he has sought to "broaden the focus of the evangelical agenda" by focusing more on tailor-made Democratic issues over traditional family issues which favor Republicans.

Folks, "Compassionate Conservatives" is nothing more than a term to describe LIBERALS pretending to be Conservatives. There is NO SUCH THING as a Liberal Conservative.

3. Some conservatives will also view his presence as a tacit endorsement of Obama's policies. Devout pro-Lifer's will surely object to this, though the counter argument is that it is better to have at least one pro-Life voice whispering in Obama's ear than to surrender this opportunity for influence. Still, many conservatives will view Warren as nothing more than a pawn, meant to cheaply provide "cover" or pacify Christian conservatives (who might now be able to justify their vote for Obama), while the new president will predictably support a socially liberal agenda.

Sorry again folks, but the truth is, NO TRUE Conservative could have EVER voted for Obama. Now is Rick Warren a pawn? A willing participate? Could he be doing this in the hopes to persuade Obama that Pro-Life is the way to go? Maybe.

While this move will surely be applauded by the center, in one fell swoop, Obama and Warren have found a way to anger many on the left and on the right.

According to Political Machines poll on their site, it seems more Libs are ticked at this than Conservatives. Liberals 6183 (58.4%)Conservatives 4404 (41.6%) at the time of me writing this.

I do remember that Faith Forum with Obama and McCain. I did not see it but I remember reading the transcripts. I remember thinking to myself that McCain was comfortable with matters of Faith, yet Obama was all over the place. attempting to tick off the least amount of people. He was trying to get elected at the time. So of course he could not be honest.

So what is my take on this? If Pastor Warren is legit and truly hoping to tell Obama the truth about matters of Faith and God, then I say great. If he is just trying to be part of history for selfish reasons, then I say, whatever. You see, just giving an Inaugural Invocation, a few minutes on stage, is NOT going to change Obama's mind, nor will it effect the country in any negative nor positive way whatsoever. It really is pretty much a non-issue. Just something for those on the far ends of the spectrum to argue about. It would have been a little more entertaining to have someone like Past Wright do it, but I would still stand by what I just said. It really would not matter that much either.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk- McCain Concise, Obama Elusive and Patronizing
The Political Machine -
Why Rick Warren's Inaugural Invocation Will Anger Many Conservatives

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Is The USSA Inevitable?

I'm starting to believe it may be.

Hey folks,

Little Hitler in Iran. Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, Kim Jong-il in North Korea, Putin in Russia, Castro in Cuba, now Obama in America? Is the new USSA, The United Socialist States of America, REALLY inevitable? I really am starting to think that it just might be.

We do not even have to wait for the next thirty days for Obama to be sworn in. We already know that Barack Hussein Obama TOLD us that he wants a Socialistic Society. He wants and is putting in place people that can bring that into being. Now we even have a Climate Czar, if you will. Someone in the highest office to FORCE you to accept the scam of Global Warming. Someone to impose oppressive taxation and control over PERSONAL lives in the name of saving the planet from a threat that is complete BS. It does not exist.

But let's look at the OUTGOING President. Bush has already Nationalized the Banking industry, Housing markets, and is now about to Nationalize the Auto Industry. Of course this is welcomed by Obama and some in the INCOMING Administration. It fits their agenda. Nationalize Healthcare, Education, and even the Oil Companies.

With Bush's head start, Obama will have a much easier time simply continuing down the road of Tyranny. Private business will no longer be Private. It will all work together toward the "Common Good" of all Americans. Individual Freedoms will be reduced to "Level the Playing Field," and the wealth will be spread around. In control of it all, will be a Centralize Government. They will decide what is best for you.

One of the problems is the People. The People are not only allowing this to happen right before our eyes, some are encouraging it. Calling for it. Yes I know that the majority of this Country is still against it, but those in power seem to be for nothing less. So how can this possibly happen here in the greatest Country in the World? Ignorance is one of the most simplistic answers. People just do not know WHAT Socialism is.

As I said before, Hitler could not rise by himself. He had people HELPING him to. Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili {Joseph Stalin} same thing. The Soviet Union would have never been, had not some people WANTED it to be. ONE man, one idea, can do little. They need support. Little Hitler {Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad} is rising right now because there are many helping him. Including some in this very country. Hugo Chavez approved 33 other changes to the constitution.

“We will do what we have to do to approve the constitutional reforms that the president proposes because that is what the people want,” said Iris Varela, a pro-Chavez member of parliament.

Sound familiar? Obama does not like the Constitution. He said that there are too many restriction and it is not conducive to what he wants to do. So? will he change it to make it fit? He could. Chavez also shut down Radio and TV stations. Can you say Fairness Doctrine?

Remember Senator Maxine Waters said this, Thursday 22, 2008, during the show hearing.

"And guess what this liberal would be all about? This liberal would be all about socialize -- uh, uh, would be about basically taking over and the government running all of your companies."

She was talking about Oil. But we are seeing this right now with other Industries by Bush. The latest is the Auto Industry. Conservative Republicans implored the White House not to use money from the $700 billion bailout for the financial sector to aid car makers. A leading House Democrat, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., said the government should secure veto power over the companies' business decisions as part of any aid.

Congress will not vote on it. They WANT Bush to do it. This way, when they take over, Obama can say, "Hey, Bush appointed this "Car Czar" and put these things in place. We just have to improve on them and continue them in the way Bush's own Press Secretary Dana Perino said, 'We're trying to do something that's responsible.'"

Remember what Campaign for America's Future co-director Roger Hickey said?

“Congressional Conservatives and the President are the culprits who have stood in the way of a new progressive direction for our nation”

“A new progressive direction for our nation”
SOCIALISM He came out and said it. Well, it does not look like Bush is standing in the way anymore. It looks more like Bush is leading the way. In about 30 days, there will be no REAL opposition at all in Congress. There may not even be all that much opposition against the PROPAGANDA of the Mainstreme Media, who simple write and report what they are told to.

Is the new USSA inevitable? It just may be.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk- The New Liberalism on Full Display
OPNTalk- Why Socialism Is Possible
AP-
White House pressured by lawmakers on auto bailout

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Tell Me Again There Is No Real Threat

I guess these men were just misunderstood. Just isolated incidents.

Hey folks,

You know the story. This time, no TV cameras. No Host asking "What were you thinking?" This time, just the Cops and the bad guys.

Sun Sentinel - Officials nab 17 men for soliciting sex from minors by Joel Marino South Florida Sun-Sentinel 6:35 PM EST, December 15, 2008

Authorities have arrested 17 men from across South Florida after a seven month-long operation where officials say the men solicited sex from or traveled to have sex with minors.

The multi-agency operation, dubbed "2 Young 2", nabbed eight men from Broward County; seven from Miami-Dade County; and two from Palm Beach County, according to the Broward Sheriff's Office. The oldest suspect is 59 and the youngest 19.

Officials say 15 of the suspects traveled to prearranged locations to meet up with the children they thought they'd met online; once there, sheriff's deputies and officers with the U.S. Marshals Service arrested them.

Authorities arrested two other men on warrants, the Sheriff's Office said.

Now back on November 24, 2008 I posted this. Kids and the Internet. That prompted a follow up on December 2, 2008, Follow Up On Kids and The Internet . It started a pretty good conversation here and elsewhere, but some people actually believe the "Experts" that there really is a low threat of this type of thing happening. That this type of thing is rare.

Well, as pcpandora pointed out, like the NBC specials SHOW, and as we just read happening just in the last couple of days, I would beg to differ. The facts just do not pan out to "No real threat." The facts say there IS.

With the Holiday Season upon us, we will have kids and those who wish to hurt them, with a lot more free time on their hands. It is YOUR job as a Parent, to PROTECT them. Your kids that is. Even if that means protecting themselves from themselves.
Peter

Sources:
Sun Sentinel - Officials nab 17 men for soliciting sex from minors

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Not Looking Good For Jackson and Emanuel

Preview For Sunday 121408

Hey folks,

Happy Sunday to you. Welcome to the Big Sunday Edition of the OPNTalk Blog.

Well, it's not looking good for Jesse Jackson Jr. and Obama's New Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel. According to the AP - Disgraced Illinois governor weighs legal options

The scandal continued to hound Reps. Jesse Jackson Jr. and Rahm Emanuel, Obama's choice for chief of staff. About a dozen protesters stood outside Jackson's office Saturday demanding his resignation, and Republicans called for more information from Obama about Emanuel's role in the Senate selection process.

The Chicago Tribune reported that Emanuel had conversations — captured on wiretaps — before the election with the Blagojevich administration about who would replace Obama in the Senate. The report did not suggest any dealmaking in the conversations, and Obama has strongly denied that anyone on his team committed wrongdoing.

Jackson was identified as one of the candidates Blagojevich was considering to replace Obama, and a criminal complaint said his supporters were willing to raise $1.5 million for the governor to make the appointment happen.


Now do not get me wrong. There is STILL no evidence of ANY wrong doing on Obama's part. I still stand by, call me silly, the notion of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Anyway, coming right up today?


Blackness Does Not Equal Greatness
Playtime Is Over Obama
Let Us Not Forget The Troops
Follow Up On Abortion Has Negative Effects On Mental Wellness
IWA For Sunday 121408


Right after this, I have to run. You know what today is? Decoration Day. Yup. Yours truly will be up on a latter, to decorate my house for Christmas. First time ever. Friends and family are coming over and a good time will be had by all. Here is an "Only in Florida" thing. While we are decorating, I will also be BBQing some Chicken and maybe a steak or two. I have been here for 8 years now, I STILL can not get use to "Jingle Bells" and Christmas Shopping in a Tee Shirt and sometimes even Shorts. {Smile}


Be right back, with that RANT I have been trying to get off my chest for the past week. Get your coffee, get ready, here we go.
Peter

Blackness Does Not Equal Greatness

What has Obama done?

Hey folks,

OK. Rant time. I have to get this off my chest. Like I was saying last week. This past Weekend I was debating someone about Obama. Now you all know, and some of you not too happy, that I have been defending Obama in this latest "scandal". Not really looking good for Rahm Emanuel, but still no real evidence that Obama is involved at all.

However, this person was going on and on about how great Obama is. How he is going to save the Country and bring world peace. How he is the greatest President we have had in our life time. They told me about the Mainstreme Media's call for a Holiday named after him and even one reporter saying that he should be the next head on Mt Rushmore.

Are you serious? WHAT HAS OBAMA DONE? What is it about him that makes him so great? He did NOTHING in the Senate. Except run for President. Oh, that community organizer thing? He failed at that. He said so in his book. So what has he done?

Well, he is the first Black President. So? Did HE do that? No. Did he chose to be Black? No. He was born that way. He is here because his Mother met and had sexual relations with a Black Man. Pop. Out comes Obama.

The fact that Obama, or ANY Black Man was able to run for and win the Presidency says VOLUMES for how far our Country has come to actually Elect a Black Person to the highest office in the land. But is this REALLY a reflection on Obama's greatness or lack thereof?

So far, Obama as done nothing. He has not even been sworn in yet. I'm all for recognition for great accomplishments. The greater the accomplishment, the greater the recognition. Let's say Obama DOES come into office and achieves world peace. Cures Cancer, brings Iran to a place where Little Hitler and their nuclear quest is thrown out.

Let's say he IS able to smile and wipe out the hopes and dreams of Putin to restore the USSR. THEN I will join the crowd and praise him. Then I would say, you know what, yeah, for XYZ, he needs a Holiday named after him. So far? Nothing.

I'm sorry, but try as hard as some may, Blackness does not equal greatness. Accomplishments and achievements may. Until he actually DOES something, I will refrain from calling for a Stamp, Holiday, and sure as hell, his face on Mt. Rushmore.
Peter

Playtime Is Over Obama

You had better get ready.

Hey folks,

I really do not think I need to add ANYTHING to this. But I will. This is from the AP - Foes ready to test Obama overseas By PAUL HAVEN, Associated Press Writer

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev chose the day after Barack Obama's election victory to brandish a threat of ballistic missiles. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said of the president-elect: "I hope he doesn't end up being one more imperialist."

As for Al-Qaida, it likened Barack Obama to a favored slave doing his master's bidding.

Obama's running mate, Joe Biden, predicted the new president would quickly be tested by a dangerous world. That test might come from anywhere, but attention has focused on North Korea, Iran, Russia and Venezuela, and the al-Qaida terror group.

Folks, I and a few others WARNED you about this. Obama seemed to be completely ignorant toward foreign policies. He seemed to have NO idea whatsoever in what he was getting into. Why do you think that he focused on Class Warfare? Why do you think he was promising everyone something? GREED helped get Obama elected. By Idiots and Sheeple that have, still to this day, NO IDEA whatsoever who Obama actually is and what he actually stands for.

Obama's Republican opponent, John McCain, called him too inexperienced to be president. So did Hillary Clinton, now his choice for secretary of state. Since his election, Obama has filled his national security team with centrists and relative hawks — a possible warning not to underestimate him.

Please. These World Tyrants and Terrorists are not Idiots. They KNOW Obama is not all that bright. They KNOW that he will most likely NOT engage them. Like the eight years of Clinton, when we were attacked over and over again without a response, they know NOW is the time to plan again.

"What Obama absolutely must prove early on in his administration is that he cannot be played for a patsy, that he has the strength ... and that he understands his no. 1 duty is as commander in chief and protector of the United States," said Robin Niblett, the director of Chatham House, the London-based think tank.

But he really DOESN'T. His number one priority seems to be taking over the country. He has backed away from a lot of promises that he has made to the Kooks, but he hasn't really EVER gave any indication that he understands the World is a dangerous place. He seems to be under the impression that he can just smile and play nice and the World will love us. {sigh}

Niblett said Obama's approach to foreign policy is the right one, and that his willingness to talk to America's adversaries will actually make their lives harder.

WHAT?!?!?

"I think these leaders are worried about how America is going to play them," he said. "So far, they have become very comfortable being able to play a rather simplistic American foreign policy."

Already there are signs that some of America's most strident foes are not eager for a fight.

Plunging oil prices have slammed the economies of Russia, Venezuela and Iran; health issues surround Kim Jong Il, the reclusive leader of North Korea, and have forced the retirement of Cuba's Fidel Castro; Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is facing a stiff re-election fight in 2009 amid double-digit unemployment and 30 percent inflation.

Complete and utter nonsense. Obama had nothing to do with lowering oil prices. Little Hitler, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is NOT going anywhere. He was thought to lose the PAST election. He didn't. When are these "Smart" people going to get it. Iran, China, Russia, Cuba, all these places, THEY ARE NOT AMERICA. THEY DO NOT HAVE FAIR AND CLEAR ELECTIONS. The Will of the people matters NOT. But then again some say this past election shows that OUR Will matters not. An inexperienced, Socialistic, Puppet, got elected. But again, I hope I'm wrong.

Fyodor Lukyanov, editor of the Moscow-based Russia in Global Affairs Magazine, noted that Medvedev and his mentor — Prime Minister Vladimir Putin — quickly dropped their hard-line stance after threatening to place short-range missiles near Poland in response to the Bush Administration's backing of a missile defense shield.

Three weeks after Obama's victory, Medvedev talked to Obama by phone and said he was looking for "constructive, partnerlike relations" and that "The conversation I had with the president-elect allows me to expect a similar U.S. approach."

"The Kremlin has signaled readiness to tone down its rhetoric," Lukyanov said. "Apparently, they decided to try to improve ties."

Do not buy it folks. Putin wants the USSR back. Forget Medvedev. He is just like Obama. A figurehead. Nothing more than that. Vladimir Putin, who was also thought to disappear after Russia's Election, is still there. Make no mistake about it. He is STILL in charge.

Even America's toughest critics sounded a conciliatory note. Ahmadinejad sent Obama a congratulatory letter. Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez drew parallels to John F. Kennedy even as he welcomed Russian warships into the Caribbean for joint naval exercises.

{laughing} Sorry folks, this is just funny to me. I'm not sure if Paul Haven, the writer of this piece, actually believes this or not, but seriously? Of COURSE a Dictator would send Obama a congratulation letter. They think he may be one of them. They were HOPING he would get elected. Of course they want to appear to play nice with us. This way, Obama, being as ignorant as he seems, will talk nice and leave them alone. Then they can work on their plans to KILL US! To Kill others and take their land. Of course they want to be "Friends" with Obama.

In Cuba, Raul Castro said he was willing to meet the new president on neutral ground. His brother, Fidel, tempered expectations of a change in U.S. policy or a lifting of the decades-old embargo, but called Obama a "smart man."

North Korea's state-run media have refrained from their usual anti-American rhetoric. They haven't commented on Obama's pledge to sit down with adversaries, but analysts say it has gotten Pyongyang's attention.

"North Korea certainly has good feelings about Obama," said Kim Yong-hyun, a professor at Seoul's Dongguk University. "But does it mean that the North will stake everything on Obama and try to curry favor with him? No way."

Analysts say softened language goes only so far in improving relations. The International Atomic Energy Agency says Iran continues to enrich uranium and is about halfway to having enough for a nuclear bomb, and unless it backs down, relations with the U.S. are unlikely to improve.

YEAH! And what is Obama planning to do with Iran? Hmm? Is he going to talk nice and play footsie with little Hitler while he becomes Nuclear? Little Hitler will praise Obama and smile, He will say anything Obama wants to hear. But if Obama let's him, BOOM! MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT!

"The Iranian regime will soon disabuse the next president of any utopian belief in the power of diplomacy," Michael Rubin, of the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, wrote recently.

Chavez's conflict with the U.S. has intensified since he accused the Bush administration of backing a failed 2002 coup against him. He now says he would be willing to consider a trip to Washington for talks with Obama, but also hopes Obama does not turn into "one more imperialist" and wants him "to honor his race."

What in the Hell does that mean?

One organization that clearly hasn't softened is imminent is al-Qaida, whose no. 2, Ayman al-Zawahri, slurred Obama as a "house Negro" who had betrayed his black heritage and his father's faith.

"You were born to a Muslim father, but you chose to stand in the ranks of the enemies of the Muslims, and pray the prayer of the Jews, although you claim to be Christian, in order to climb the rungs of leadership in America," his audiotaped message said.

SMILE! Obama SMILE more! They are not getting the message. SMILE Obama SMILE. Flash those teeth and show them that you are their friend.

Some analysts say the tape shows al-Qaida's desperation, having launched no attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, and having alienated some followers by killing so many Muslims in attacks elsewhere.

THANKS TO BUSH!

Evan Kohlman, an analyst at Globalterroralert.com, said the insult could backfire.

"Al-Zawahri may have crossed some lines here," he said. "To attack Obama with a racial epithet is taking an enormous risk. You risk alienating those you are trying to reach."

What a complete load of,, garbage. Obama, playtime is over. I HOPE you are ready. They are ready for you.
Peter

Sources:
AP - Foes ready to test Obama overseas

Let Us Not Forget The Troops

With the Holidays upon us, let's not forget those serving our Country.



Hey folks,

Above is a picture of Gold Star Mom Debbie Lee giving a television interview during last year’s tour. Debbie, a remarkable, patriotic woman who lost her son, Marc Alan Lee, in the defense of our country will be back on the bus this year.

Nationwide Tour to Collect Care Packages for Troops Serving Overseas this Holiday Season

Sacramento, CA – Move America Forward, the nation’s largest pro-troop grassroots organization, is conducting a nationwide tour to support sending care packages to the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

“With Americans focused on the economic problems facing our country, we have to ensure that our troops in harm’s way are not forgotten during the Christmas and Hanukkah holiday season,” said Melanie Morgan, Chairman of Move America Forward.

Traveling on the tour will be Gold Star Mom Debbie Lee, - whose son Marc Alan Lee was the first Navy S.E.A.L. killed in Iraq. Lee said, “I remember his feelings of pride for serving our country, but also the loneliness troops endure during the holiday season. Instead of celebrating Christmas and Hanukkah with their families, many military men and women will be spending the holidays this year protecting our freedom in far off lands.”

To show the nation’s gratitude and support, Move America Forward’s Debbie Lee and singer/songwriter Diana Nagy (who will perform her hit song “Where Freedom Flies” at each stop) will be on the road encouraging people to send care packages from December 13 – December 19.

Last year, MAF toured the country during the holiday season to collect holiday cards for the troops with the goal of sending 100,000 holiday cards. They collected more than double that amount and hope Americans will show the same support this year by purchasing care packages in which sponsors can write individual notes to show their support. Packages include gourmet Artisan Coffee and Cornerstone Coffee, Oreo Cookies and Jelly Belly jelly beans made famous by President Ronald Reagan.

For those who are not on the tour route, care packages can be purchased online and individual notes can still be included. Orders can be placed by going to the website: http://www.moveamericaforward.com/ and clicking on the “Coffee and Cookies for our Troops” icon.

ITINERARY

Sacramento, CA on 12/13
Las Vegas, NV on 12/14
Phoenix, AZ on 12/14
El Paso, TX on 12/15
San Antonio, TX on 12/16
Austin, TX on 12/16
Houston, TX on 12/17
Baton Rouge, LA on 12/18
Mobile, AL on 12/18
Tallahassee, FL on 12/19
Jacksonville, FL on 12/19

For those of you who are able and chose to help out. THANK YOU! I have said this more times than I can remember, but it remains as true today as it ever was before. Forget politics. Forget what you may or may not think of the reasons we went to Iraq. Hate the War, support our Troops.

These Men and Women, Brothers and Sisters, Mothers and Fathers, Sons and Daughters, are fighting the fight. They are risking the ultimate sacrifice for YOU. During this Holiday Season, let them know you are thinking of them. While WE are sitting at the foot of trees decked out in lights, sitting down to dinners surrounded by friends and family, they are in a foreign land trying to do their duty. Trying to just survive. Again, FOR YOU.

So to all the Troops out there, past and present. Happy Holidays and THANK YOU!
Peter

Follow Up On Abortion Has Negative Effects On Mental Wellness

Health and Science Segment 121408

Hey folks,

Just one week ago, I posted this. Abortion Has Negative Effects On Mental Wellness. I received the following from Steve Ertelt, Founder and Editor of LifeNews.com and Right to Life of Wyoming President, who said...

The JHU review failed to include three new studies all showing abortion leads to significant mental health problems for women.

Last week, Dr. Priscilla Coleman, a professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green State University, and her colleagues published a study in the Journal of Psychiatric Research showing the link exists.
http://www.lifenews.com/nat4617.html

The research team found induced abortions result in increased risks for a myriad of mental health problems ranging from anxiety to depression to substance abuse disorders.

The number of cases of mental health issues rose by as much as 17 percent in women having abortions compared to those who didn't have one and the risks of each particular mental health problem rose as much as 145% for post-abortive women.

For 12 out of 15 of the mental health outcomes examined, a decision to have an abortion resulted in an elevated risk for women.

"What is most notable in this study is that abortion contributed significant independent effects to numerous mental health problems above and beyond a variety of other traumatizing and stressful life experiences," they concluded.

Earlier this week, researchers at Otago University in New Zealand reported their findings in the British Journal of Psychiatry and found that women who have abortions have an increased risk of developing mental health problems.
http://www.lifenews.com/int1008.html

The study found that women who had abortions had rates of mental health problems about 30% higher than other women. The conditions most associated with abortion included anxiety disorders and substance abuse disorders.

Abortions increased the risk of severe depression and anxiety by one-third and as many as 5.5 percent of all mental health disorders seen in New Zealand result from women having abortions.

A third study, from a team at the University of Queensland and published in the December issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry, found women who have an abortion are three times more likely to experience a drug or alcohol problem during their lifetime.
http://www.lifenews.com/int1012.html

The study showed that women who had experienced an abortion were at increased risk of illicit drug and alcohol use compared with women who had never been pregnant or who gave birth.

I found these other studies very interesting also, so I thanked him of course and posted this over at EThepeople.org. Now folks, as a side note, ETP is a great place to go if you want interesting people and interesting conversations. Yeah, there are some Liberals there. Yes, some of my more Conservative friends will most likely see things there that will make their heads shake in amazement, but for the most part, there are some great people there. Really interesting conversations. You should check it out.

Some there left some GREAT comments. I did not receive permission to posts some of them here in time so if you want to see them go HERE. However, this is the kind of thing I got there. This was also a comment left last week here. It is from kwix who said...

Thanks for the studies, Peter. I looked them over and neither one seems to be the sort of conservative faux "studies" we so often see. Whatever their motivations or funding, they both seem to be real objective scientific attempts to discover some truth.

I should note that one study showed only what it terms a "mild" (or perhaps "slight"; I don't have the text in front of me) correlation. But I should also note that these studies only show correlation -- not causation. In other words, we have no proof that abortion causes these mental wellness defects -- only that they tend to exist at a higher level in people who have abortions. It could of course well be that mental wellness defects lead one to have unwanted pregnancies that then lead to abortions.

Of course, it seems to me highly likely that abortion DOES adversely affect one's emotional health. We know that spontaneous abortion -- e.g., losing a child involuntarily -- has huge emotional consequences; surely doing so intentionally would ahve consequences at least as significant. In other words, these studies represent (like so many studies!) a sort of "DUH" idea. It's the sort of thing most of us would assume. So it's hard to know why you are crowing about this so much, or claiming that "I have seen Doctors come out and say that there is no effect on the Woman at all." What "doctors" and when, Peter? I think you would have to search very hard to find such a thing; I personally have never encountered it out in the world.

In other words, it seems like you set up a straw man here, pretending that this is some big issue when really it just confirms what everybody pretty much already assumed.

After all, it's not like this has any bearing on whether abortion should be legal or not. Lots of things that have negative emotional effects are legal. Indeed, lots of things that are immoral are legal. The issue is whether or not the heavy hand of the state should decide for each of us what is right and what is wrong, or whether we should be free to apply the teachings of our own moral and religious authorities in determining such things for ourselves. I personally see a lot more spiritual and moral growth in grappling with such issues than I do in simply having everything decided for us by the government.

This is why I am pro-choice but anti-abortion. Indeed, most Americans probably are. I would never advise someone to get an abortion, and indeed would try to persuade her otherwise. But I also don't feel that my own personal opinion on the subject needs to be enforced by the heavy hand of the state. There are deeply held, moral, principled beliefs on both sides of the issue; there is no reason for the government to decide it for us.

The sad irony is that if the more extreme anti-abortion people had put even half the energy they put into trying to criminalize abortion into, instead, working together with others to actually prevent abortions -- whether by public education campgains, or support groups for girls and young women, or working to change a culture of poverty and despair in which young women see sex as the only thing they have to contribute to the world -- they would have saved far, far more of what they perceive to be human lives than they do by all their ranting and fulminating and attempts to divide us all.

Some of the comments at ETP were similar, some more understanding of my position, some less. But I did want to set some things straight. First, YES. I do see Abortion as the murder of an innocent life. Yes, I do believe that this Child should be protected. But I also DO understand that there may come a time when a choice has to be made between that child and the life of the Mother. I understand and accept if there are complication to the unborn, sometimes it may be more humane to end the pregnancy.

Now some think that I may be coming at this via a religious point of view. It would be impossible for me not to have some sort of guidance on this and any issue, from the Bible. From my faith. But I really am not talking about anything to do with HOW or WHY the Women got pregnant. What caused their decision to abort. Just the after effects of said decision.

I am also NOT against contraceptives. I would rather there NOT be a need to have an abortion in the first place. It is THIS type of dialog we need more of in this country. We need BETTER education. We need BETTER prevention. We need to teach people just exactly WHAT and WHO we are talking about. Both sides can learn a lot from each other. Instead of constant back and forth attacks, we need more dialog.

I just thought you may enjoy the conversations as much as I. Perhaps, like I, you may even learn something.
Peter

IWA For Sunday 121408

Shortest IWA ever given.

Hey folks,

No need for elaboration. No need for introductions. Nope. Welcome to the shortest IWA ever given.

Congratulations Gov. Rod Blagojevich for the shear and absolute arrogance, ignorance and greed, your efforts to trade the president-elect's former Senate seat for personal gain. Not to mention the stupidity of having these conversations on a PHONE. You ARE the Idiot of the Week. Most definitely also in the running for Idiot of the year.

Now, go try to buy off Fitzgerald. See how that goes.
Peter