Allen West Tore Up CPAC

Preview for Sunday 021311

Hey folks,

Happy Sunday to you. Glad you could make it. Mom and Baby, and Brother Josh are all doing just fine. I will be sure to post new Pictures on Facebook soon. Welcome to the Big Sunday Edition of the OPNTalk Blog. You know who this is. Don't forget you can follow on Twitter, Facebook, {For all those Great Photos and Quotes of the day} and as always, if you want to be a part of the OPNTalk Blog, the Email is opntalk@gmail.com.

"We cannot continue in an America where we are making more and more people wedded to government either by subsistence check or by employment check – where we are creating more victims and making people more dependent upon government That has to end, and the hard decisions come right now."

Who said that? I'll tell ya in just a Second. Coming right up today?

UGI Utilities, Inc. Trying To Do The Right Thing
Military Coup In Egypt. REALLY?
Stupidity and Recalls of Baby Monitors
DLA for Sunday 021311
IWA for Sunday 021311

The Environmental Protection Agency budget must be slashed and Congress must "start looking at every government program and agency created in the past 10 years” in order to make the necessary budget cuts,

So who is talking? Who says that America's Survival Depends on Conservative Values? Allen West.

According to Newsmax.com - Allen West: America's Survival Depends on Conservative Values, Allen West really brought the House down at CPAC.

America cannot survive as a nation if it continues making more people dependent on government checks, Rep. Allen West told a cheering crowd Saturday in closing out the 2011 Conservative Political Action Conference. The CPAC keynote speaker said America must secure the borders, protect the unborn, stand for traditional marriage and stand with Israel.

Amen! Great Job Mr. West. Keep up the good work.

Going to fill my cup. Be right back.
Peter

It's The Economy Stupid

Not Cap and Tax. Not Class Warfare. Not Obamacare. No. It's NOT Liberal Policies themselves, It's what they produce.

Hey folks,

Remember James Carville? Back in 1992, started by James, then widely used during Bill Clinton's successful 1992 Presidential Campaign against George H. W. Bush. Bush was considered a shoe in and unbeatable because of what was going on in the World such as the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf War. It worked. Why? Because people care about their pocketbook. They care about their wallets.

Remember back on Sunday, April 18, 2010, I told you my theory of The Bubble Factor. I said this.

You see, the Tea Parties are a PRODUCT of the anger. They are the result, not the cause. What about Talk Radio? The Blogs? {I guess that would mean me as well.} Again, the short answer is both yes and no. So what IS the cause? The Bubble Factor.

Let me try to explain it this way. Most people, from all walks of life, live somewhere in the middle of the spectrum of life. They live in their happy homes, drive their happy cars, go off to school then work. They have their hobbies, and they meet one another, leave their Parents and join together, having children of their own, cycle repeats.

From time to time, something will pull at their heart strings. They will donate some money, go down and volunteer at a soup kitchen, or join a cause. Yet, at the end of the day, there they are in their happy little beds, drifting off to Dream Land.

Truth is, most people have no clue as to what reality is. As long as the outside does not penetrate their little bubble, they are happy. They go to Church, say Amen, go back into their little worlds. They rarely take the time to truly look around to see what they can see.

I'm not saying this is a bad thing. No, I'm not judging anyone. Simply stating reality. For most, Politics is even more alluding. For most, Politics is about two months, every two years. One Politician says one thing, the other says something else, they go with, if they even bother to Vote, the one that best sounds most related to the view they possess. Most do not bother to learn anything beyond what they hear on the local News.

Once in a while though, something comes along and penetrates their little bubble. Then they start to look more deeply into whatever it is. A disease, War, Death or a loved one, and sadly, FINANCES.

Well? Is there any doubt that their FINANCES are taking quite a beating as of late? EVERYONE is feeling it. A new ABC NEWS Poll shows Reality. It's NOT about Race. It's not abut Obamacare. Well, it IS. But not about Obamacare itself. It's not about Class Warfare. It's about the Economy Stupid. According to ABC News - Anger About the Economy Fuels Republican Advantage GOP More PO'ed About Economy, and More Likely to Vote By ANALYSIS by GARY LANGER

That's part of the takeaway from the latest ABC News/Yahoo! News poll. Its results identify why the public's economic discontent is playing so strongly in the Republican Party's favor in the upcoming midterm elections: in elections, anger works.

2010 Election Maps: Follow the Senate, House and Governors' Races

This national survey finds that Republicans are markedly more likely than other Americans to describe themselves as "angry" about the economy. And angry people, by a wide margin, are more apt to blame the Democratic Party than the GOP for the problem.

That's because it IS the Democrats that got us where we are. It IS Obama and Crew. It IS Liberal Ideals.

Angry folks, for good measure, also are far less apt than others to believe the economy's started to show signs of recovery. That pessimism intensifies their hunt for change.

All told, 85 percent of Americans are either angry about the economy or at least dissatisfied with it, according to the survey, produced for ABC and Yahoo! News by Langer Research Associates. That makes economic discontent even higher than anger or dissatisfaction with "the way the federal government is working," at 71 percent in an ABC News/Washington Post poll last week.

I got news for ya. It's NOT just Republicans. ALL Americans are starting to feel it. Those that have it, ain't spending it. Those that don't have it, is losing even more of what they already have little of. No Jobs. Home foreclosing. No credit. NOTHING.

Now I and others have told you, just look around. There is NO Recovery. Oh the Left are trying any and everything that they can to make it appear we are on the road to recovery. They are manipulating the Stock Market. That never lasts long though, because it is not real. They manipulate the Unemployment numbers. They are trying to force some lenders to stop foreclosing, then coming out and saying that this may be a bad thing. They are having Liberal Lackey Organization coming out saying that the Recession ended a YEAR ago. {Sigh}

Yet, if you listen very closely, you can hear it. {Pop} {Pop, pop, pop,} People's Personal little bubbles are popping all over the place. People are waking up. THIS is REALITY. Why do you think no one cares about the Green Movement, or Global Warming, anymore? Well, A - they realize that it is a SCAM. B- They can't afford it. C- They do not want the Government taking over and regulating ANY MORE of their private and personal lives.

Now this piece goes on to attempt to explain it even more, but there really is nothing more to understand. It's the Economy Stupid. The magic is gone. The Dream is becoming a Nightmare for more and more people. It's kind of hard to make promises, when the prior promises are failing miserably. They are promising more of the same. Problem is, we did not want THAT to begin with. We sure enough want no more.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk - The Bubble Factor
ABC News - ABC News - Anger About the Economy Fuels Republican Advantage

To Establishment Republicans

Clear Message, Get on board, or get out of the way.

Hey folks,

There are a few things I wanted to talk about today. One is this new "Pledge to America" that the Republican Party will formally unveil later this morning at a Virginia Hardware Store. Among the items in it:

- Stop job-killing tax hikes

- Allow small businesses to take a tax deduction equal to 20 percent of their income

- Require congressional approval for any new federal regulation that would add to the deficit

- Repeal small business mandates in the new health care law.

Cutting Spending:

- Repeal and Replace health care

- Roll back non-discretionary spending to 2008 levels before TARP and stimulus (will save $100 billion in first year alone)

- Establish strict budget caps to limit federal spending going forward

- Cancel all future TARP payments and reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Reforming Congress:

- Will require that every bill have a citation of constitutional authority

- Give members at least 3 days to read bills before a vote

Some of the things sound GREAT. Can't wait to see the whole thing. However, some in the Establishment are STILL attacking O'Donnell and other Conservative Candidates. Some on the Right, are still attempting to stand in the way of Tea Party backed Candidates and those that stand up and say enough is enough.

Lets talk for a second about Christine O'Donnell. First, she "Dabbled in Witchcraft." Well, she admitted that when in school, her Boyfriend and some of her other friends were doing it. She tried it out, found she didn't like it. She became a CHRISTIAN. {Another reason some hate her.} Just like Obama dabbled in Cocaine when he was younger. Just like so many kids dabble in drugs and alcohol. She tried what her friends were doing and found it wasn't for her and moved on with life. I do not care.

Then? she didn't pay her Taxes. Turns out she DID. It was an IRS mistake. She got behind in her Mortgage. So? She made it up. How many others out there are behind? She used Campaign money to pay her bills. Nope. So all this is completely false, misleading, or totally made up. Yet? Some are still attacking her. Why? Repeat after me, Liberals attack what they fear. But some on the Right, THEY are still attacking her and saying she can't win.

Well, sorry, I said I predict she WILL win Delaware. Why? Because she is NOT a RINO nor a Democrat. A caller at the end of the second hour of the Tom Sullivan Radio Show yesterday summed it up brilliantly. He said, "As long as these things are not true, I do not care if she has 'Oompa-Loompas' in her basement, I'm Voting for her." That pretty much sums up the mood of so MANY in this Country today.

We do not want the new Liberalism. We do not want oppressive taxation. We do not want Obamacare. We do not want Cap and Tax. We do not want Amnesty. We do not want Liberal agendas forced down our throats. We do not want this Country "fundamentally changed." We do not want our Government Governing AGAINST our Will. We KNOW what is best for us. We KNOW how to handle our lives. We WANT the rebirth of the American Dream. We WANT GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR LIVES! Simply put WE WANT FREEDOM! We reject the new Liberalism in any form it takes. We WANT CONSERVATISM!

So once again to my Republican Establishment friends, you can either get on board, in which case you will be rewarded by WINNING Elections, or you can get run over. This election is about the People. It is FOR the People. The PEOPLE will be heard. Get on board, or get out of the way.
Peter

Obama Is The New Socialist Poster Boy

Truth and Facts About Obama By IBD

Hey folks,

If you have been here for ANY period of time, you KNOW that I have been talking about the New Liberalism. It is not the same as it once was. If fact, it has completely changed into what REAL Liberalism USE to fight against. Yes folks, like it or not, believe it or not, Liberalism is NOW a quest for Tyranny. If you have not been here for a while, check out this montage.

I pointed out their words, their actions, their plans. I spelled out the difference in the New vs Old Liberalism Ideals. I have been warning you that America itself MAY very well be at stake this election. I'm not kidding. I'm not exaggerating in the least. What I have found in discussing these things over the years in various places around the Internet, is that most folks, just REALLY can not accept this. They just can not imagine that this type of thing could possibly EVER happen here. This is America. The greatest Country on Earth. So I posted EXACTLY how it could happen here.

Well, NOW others are starting to point out this possibility. With the same reasons I have and will continue. The FACTS and TRUTH speaks for themselves. Our friends over at Investor's Business Daily, are doing a series on this very issue about Obama. They call it the The Audacity of Socialism. Here is how they start it off.

Barack Obama has styled himself a centrist, but does his record support that claim?

In this series, we examine Senator Obama's past, his voting record and the people who've served as his advisers and mentors over the years. We'll show how the facts of Obama's actions and associations reveal a far more left-leaning tilt to his background — and to his politics.

I want to touch on Part One today.

Barack Obama's Stealth Socialism

Election '08: Before friendly audiences, Barack Obama speaks passionately about something called "economic justice." He uses the term obliquely, though, speaking in code — socialist code.

During his NAACP speech earlier this month, Sen. Obama repeated the term at least four times. "I've been working my entire adult life to help build an America where economic justice is being served," he said at the group's 99th annual convention in Cincinnati.

You know what folks, I'm just going to post the whole thing.

And as president, "we'll ensure that economic justice is served," he asserted. "That's what this election is about." Obama never spelled out the meaning of the term, but he didn't have to. His audience knew what he meant, judging from its thumping approval.

It's the rest of the public that remains in the dark, which is why we're launching this special educational series.

"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.

In the past, such rhetoric was just that — rhetoric. But Obama's positioning himself with alarming stealth to put that rhetoric into action on a scale not seen since the birth of the welfare state.

In his latest memoir he shares that he'd like to "recast" the welfare net that FDR and LBJ cast while rolling back what he derisively calls the "winner-take-all" market economy that Ronald Reagan reignited (with record gains in living standards for all).

Obama also talks about "restoring fairness to the economy," code for soaking the "rich" — a segment of society he fails to understand that includes mom-and-pop businesses filing individual tax returns.

It's clear from a close reading of his two books that he's a firm believer in class envy. He assumes the economy is a fixed pie, whereby the successful only get rich at the expense of the poor.

Following this discredited Marxist model, he believes government must step in and redistribute pieces of the pie. That requires massive transfers of wealth through government taxing and spending, a return to the entitlement days of old.

Of course, Obama is too smart to try to smuggle such hoary collectivist garbage through the front door. He's disguising the wealth transfers as "investments" — "to make America more competitive," he says, or "that give us a fighting chance," whatever that means.

Among his proposed "investments":

• "Universal," "guaranteed" health care.

• "Free" college tuition.

• "Universal national service" (a la Havana).

• "Universal 401(k)s" (in which the government would match contributions made by "low- and moderate-income families").

• "Free" job training (even for criminals).

• "Wage insurance" (to supplement dislocated union workers' old income levels).

• "Free" child care and "universal" preschool.

• More subsidized public housing.

• A fatter earned income tax credit for "working poor."

• And even a Global Poverty Act that amounts to a Marshall Plan for the Third World, first and foremost Africa.

His new New Deal also guarantees a "living wage," with a $10 minimum wage indexed to inflation; and "fair trade" and "fair labor practices," with breaks for "patriot employers" who cow-tow to unions, and sticks for "nonpatriot" companies that don't.

That's just for starters — first-term stuff.

Obama doesn't stop with socialized health care. He wants to socialize your entire human resources department — from payrolls to pensions. His social-microengineering even extends to mandating all employers provide seven paid sick days per year to salary and hourly workers alike.

You can see why Obama was ranked, hands-down, the most liberal member of the Senate by the National Journal. Some, including colleague and presidential challenger John McCain, think he's the most liberal member in Congress.

But could he really be "more left," as McCain recently remarked, than self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (for whom Obama has openly campaigned, even making a special trip to Vermont to rally voters)?

Obama's voting record, going back to his days in the Illinois statehouse, says yes. His career path — and those who guided it — leads to the same unsettling conclusion.

The seeds of his far-left ideology were planted in his formative years as a teenager in Hawaii — and they were far more radical than any biography or profile in the media has portrayed.

A careful reading of Obama's first memoir, "Dreams From My Father," reveals that his childhood mentor up to age 18 — a man he cryptically refers to as "Frank" — was none other than the late communist Frank Marshall Davis, who fled Chicago after the FBI and Congress opened investigations into his "subversive," "un-American activities."

As Obama was preparing to head off to college, he sat at Davis' feet in his Waikiki bungalow for nightly bull sessions. Davis plied his impressionable guest with liberal doses of whiskey and advice, including: Never trust the white establishment.

"They'll train you so good," he said, "you'll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh**."

They edited that. I did not.

After college, where he palled around with Marxist professors and took in socialist conferences "for inspiration," Obama followed in Davis' footsteps, becoming a "community organizer" in Chicago.

His boss there was Gerald Kellman, whose identity Obama also tries to hide in his book. Turns out Kellman's a disciple of the late Saul "The Red" Alinsky, a hard-boiled Chicago socialist who wrote the "Rules for Radicals" and agitated for social revolution in America.

The Chicago-based Woods Fund provided Kellman with his original $25,000 to hire Obama. In turn, Obama would later serve on the Woods board with terrorist Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground. Ayers was one of Obama's early political supporters.

After three years agitating with marginal success for more welfare programs in South Side Chicago, Obama decided he would need to study law to "bring about real change" — on a large scale.

While at Harvard Law School, he still found time to hone his organizing skills. For example, he spent eight days in Los Angeles taking a national training course taught by Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. With his newly minted law degree, he returned to Chicago to reapply — as well as teach — Alinsky's "agitation" tactics.

(A video-streamed bio on Obama's Web site includes a photo of him teaching in a University of Chicago classroom. If you freeze the frame and look closely at the blackboard Obama is writing on, you can make out the words "Power Analysis" and "Relationships Built on Self Interest" — terms right out of Alinsky's rule book.)

Amid all this, Obama reunited with his late father's communist tribe in Kenya, the Luo, during trips to Africa.

As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Harvard-educated economist, grew to challenge the ruling pro-Western government for not being socialist enough. In an eight-page scholarly paper published in 1965, he argued for eliminating private farming and nationalizing businesses "owned by Asians and Europeans."

His ideas for communist-style expropriation didn't stop there. He also proposed massive taxes on the rich to "redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all."

"Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed," Obama Sr. wrote. "I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development."

Taxes and "investment" . . . the fruit truly does not fall far from the vine.

(Voters might also be interested to know that Obama, the supposed straight shooter, does not once mention his father's communist leanings in an entire book dedicated to his memory.)

In Kenya's recent civil unrest, Obama privately phoned the leader of the opposition Luo tribe, Raila Odinga, to voice his support. Odinga is so committed to communism he named his oldest son after Fidel Castro.

With his African identity sewn up, Obama returned to Chicago and fell under the spell of an Afrocentric pastor. It was a natural attraction. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright preaches a Marxist version of Christianity called "black liberation theology" and has supported the communists in Cuba, Nicaragua and elsewhere.

Obama joined Wright's militant church, pledging allegiance to a system of "black values" that demonizes white "middle classness" and other mainstream pursuits.

(Obama in his first book, published in 1995, calls such values "sensible." There's no mention of them in his new book.)

With the large church behind him, Obama decided to run for political office, where he could organize for "change" more effectively. "As an elected official," he said, "I could bring church and community leaders together easier than I could as a community organizer or lawyer."

He could also exercise real, top-down power, the kind that grass-roots activists lack. Alinsky would be proud.

Throughout his career, Obama has worked closely with a network of stone-cold socialists and full-blown communists striving for "economic justice."

He's been traveling in an orbit of collectivism that runs from Nairobi to Honolulu, and on through Chicago to Washington.

Yet a recent AP poll found that only 6% of Americans would describe Obama as "liberal," let alone socialist.

Public opinion polls usually reflect media opinion, and the media by and large have portrayed Obama as a moderate "outsider" (the No. 1 term survey respondents associate him with) who will bring a "breath of fresh air" to Washington.

The few who have drilled down on his radical roots have tended to downplay or pooh-pooh them. Even skeptics have failed to connect the dots for fear of being called the dreaded "r" word.

But too much is at stake in this election to continue mincing words.

As I keep telling you. America itself is at stake.

Both a historic banking crisis and 1970s-style stagflation loom over the economy. Democrats, who already control Congress, now threaten to filibuster-proof the Senate in what could be a watershed election for them — at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

A perfect storm of statism is forming, and our economic freedoms are at serious risk.

Those who care less about looking politically correct than preserving the free-market individualism that's made this country great have to start calling things by their proper name to avert long-term disaster.

I know this is long. I know my montage is long with a lot of information jammed into it. I really want you to read it over and over until you get it. It CAN and actually IS happening here. THESE are the FACTS. Obama is not the glorious Media Messiah, who will bring change to this country to help all those in need. He is not this pure and clean Saint sent to save us that they like to portray to you as they dry hump his leg like dogs in heat while ignoring the TRUTH about Obama.

OK, Sorry, I know this is a lot to take in, but I'll be right back with Part Two.
Peter

Obama Is The New Socialist Poster Boy Part Two

Continuing Series from IBD

OK, I'm back. Here is Part Two from Investor's Business Daily - Obama's Global Tax

Election '08: A plan by Barack Obama to redistribute American wealth on a global level is moving forward in the Senate. It follows Marxist theology — from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

We are citizens of the world, Sen. Obama told thousands of nonvoting Germans during his recent tour of the Middle East and Europe. And if the Global Poverty Act (S. 2433) he has sponsored becomes law, which is almost certain if he wins in November, we're also going to be taxpayers of the world.

Speaking in Berlin, Obama said: "While the 20th century taught us that we share a common destiny, the 21st has revealed a world more intertwined than at any time in human history."

What the 20th century really showed was a series of totalitarian threats — from fascism to Nazism to communism — defeated by the U.S. military. Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Tojo's Japan and the Soviet Union offered destinies we did not share.

Our destiny of peace and freedom through strength was not achieved by a transnationalist fantasy of buying the world a Coke and singing "Kumbaya."

WHO WROTE THIS? Oh, By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY {Laughing} I really wish they gave the name of the ACTUAL Author. Folks, Some of you will realize that these words mirror what I have been saying for the last two years. Since the LWL {Far Left Wing Loony Fringe} completely took over the once great Democratic Party, the New Liberalism has been on full display.

Obama's Global Poverty Act offers us a global socialist destiny we do not want, one that challenges America's very sovereignty. The former "post-racial" candidate obviously intends to be a post-national president.

A statement from Obama's office says: "With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces. It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter and clean drinking water."

These are worthy goals, but note there's no mention of spreading democracy, expanding free trade, promoting entrepreneurial capitalism or ridding the world of despots who rule and ravage countries such as Zimbabwe and Sudan.

Obama would give them all a fish without teaching them how to fish. Pledging to cut global poverty in half on the backs of U.S. taxpayers is a ridiculous and impossible goal.

His legislation refers to the "millennium development goal," a phrase from a declaration adopted by the United Nations Millennium Assembly in 2000 and supported by President Clinton.

It calls for the "eradication of poverty" in part through the "redistribution (of) wealth of land" and "a fair distribution of the earth's resources." In other words: American resources.

It's a mantra of liberals that the U.S. is only a small portion of the world's population yet consumes an unseemly portion of the planet's supposedly finite resources. Never mentioned is the fact that America's population, just 5% of the world's total, also produces a stunning 27% of the world's GDP — to the enormous benefit of other countries. Nonetheless, their solution is to siphon off the product of our free democracy and distribute it.

We already transfer too much national wealth to the United Nations and its busybody agencies. Obama's bill would force U.S. taxpayers to fork over 0.7% of our gross domestic product every year to fund a global war on poverty, spending well above the $16.3 billion in global poverty aid the U.S. already spends.

Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development Conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S is expected to meet its part of the U.N. Millennium goals, we would be spending an additional $65 billion annually for a total of $845 billion.

During a time of economic uncertainty, the plan would cost every American taxpayer around $2,500.

READ THAT AGAIN! Every taxpayer, YOU, $2,500

If you're worried about gasoline and heating oil prices now, think what they'll be like when the U.S. is subjected in an Obama administration to global energy consumption and production taxes. Obama's Global Poverty Act is the "international community's" foot in the door.

The U.N. Millennium declaration called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy production — oil, natural gas, coal . . . fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for the airplane use of the skies, fees for the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels."

Co-sponsors of S. 2433 include Democrats Maria Cantwell of Washington, Dianne Feinstein of California, Richard Durbin of Illinois and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. GOP globalists supporting the bill include Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Richard Lugar of Indiana.

Sorry, but Chucky Hagel is a RINO. He really is no Republican. As for Lugar?

Lugar has worked with Obama to promote more aid to Russia to promote nuclear nonproliferation. Lugar also promotes the Law of the Sea treaty, which turns over the world's oceans to an International Seabed Authority that would charge us to drill offshore and have veto power over the movements and actions of the U.S. Navy.

Can you say "turn over our Sovereignty?"

Obama's agenda sounds like defeated 2004 Democratic candidate John Kerry's "global test" for U.S. foreign policy decisions where "you have to do it in a way that passes the test — that passes the global test — where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons."

Bunk.

Obama has called on the U.S. to "lead by example" on global warming and probably would submit to a Kyoto-like agreement that would sock Americans with literally trillions of dollars in costs over the next half century for little or no benefit.

Because GW IS BS. A Scam. There is NO threat.

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times . . . and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama has said. "That's not leadership. That's not going to happen."

No, not if he get's elected.

Oh, really? Who's to say we can't load up our SUV and head out in search of bacon double cheeseburgers at the mall? China? India? Bangladesh? The U.N.?

In an Obama White House, American sovereignty will become an endangered species. The Global Poverty Act is the first toe in the water of global socialism.

I was serious folks. I would REALLY love to know who the actual Author of this is. I would LOVE to drop them a note. I hope they continue this series.

All I can say is keep these facts in mind. When you go to the polls to vote in the next President of the United States of America. Make SURE you KNOW who you are really voting for. Not the hype. Not the Mass Marketing Machine Driven empty suite. The REAL Obama. Make sure that you KNOW that a vote for him, may very well be a vote for the New USSA. The United Socialist States Of America.

See you tomorrow for From the Emails.
Peter