DLA For Sunday 031112

It is without a doubt, the Federal Government, NOT Texas, playing Politics with Poor Women's Healthcare.

Hey folks,

OK so we just talked about this. Texas does not allow Tax Payer Funding for Abortion. They do not allow Providers, can you say Planned Parenthood, that provide Abortions to receive Tax Money. They do not BAN these places, or hinder their Operation. If YOU choose to have an Abortion, you can go there and pay for it. It will be done. As long as the Murder of Innocent Lives is still legal in this Country, People like Planned Parenthood will still make a pile of money doing it.

This basic fact is the whole reason WHY it is Patently Absurd to think ANYONE would be attempting to ban Contraceptives. No one is. All this is, is, nonsenses and a distraction. They do not want you to talk about Obama's Record. They do not want you talking about Jobs, Housing, the National Debt, $5.00 a gallon gas. No. They do not want you talking about the Economy. They want you thinking and talking about how the GOP have this "War on Women." None of this is even remotely true.

In the next wave of BS, Obama and Crew announce that they will cut Funding going to Texas because Texas will not allow the money to pay for Abortion. Problem is, they never told Texas about this. Gov. Perry wins the Logic Award be telling it like it is.

Perry blasted Sebelius' announcement, insisting Medicaid rules give states the right to determine which clinics are qualified to provide women's health care.

"The fact that the Obama administration would announce its decision to deny care for more than 100,000 low-income women during a press event before giving official notice to the state is a clear demonstration of the political motivation behind this decision," he said in a written statement, adding that Texas officials are still waiting for official word on the decision.

There really is no other way to look at this. This is EXACTLY what Obama is doing. Playing Politics with the Health and Well being of those he CLAIMS to be all about helping.

Congratulations Gov. Perry, you are the Winner of the Display of Logic Award for today, Sunday, March 11th, 2012. Thank you for speaking the truth, and PLEASE, do not give in to this nonsensical Political pressure. Continue to stand for what the PEOPLE in Texas want. And they don't want this.

However Gov. Perry. There is something I would LOVE to ask you. Your Spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Health and Human Services, Stephanie Goodman, just said this.

Stephanie Goodman, spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Health and Human Services, said money to pay for the program would be diverted from others that are under budget — though she didn't offer specifics. If that doesn't cover the costs, she said, the state would increase its deficit to pay for the services because officials believe that if low-income women don't have access to birth control, the birth rate would rise and cost the state another $57 million in maternity bills.

{Sigh} Abortion and Contraceptives SAVE the State Money? Children are a burden? Did she not just say this? Here is the problem if we accept the premise, which I do not, that this is Fact. Besides the fact that it is STILL not MY or YOUR responsibility to pay for it. This is a dangerous road for us to go down.

First, It would not cost the State, nor the Feral Government ANYHTING, if we did not have YEARS of failed Liberal Policies that destroyed the Traditional Family, and DECADES of training people to rely on Government from Cradle to the Grave. So? Have a kid, Government gives you more Money. Want an abortion, Government Pays for it. Because an Abortion is Cheaper than paying for a Kid. Diapers, Formula, Food, Education, Healthcare, ETC. Of course it is Cheaper to just KILL it before it grows.

To make a statement that sounds like something right out of Pelosi's Mouth. She advocates a China Like One Child Policy. They are using this to MANDATE that WE all collectively PAY for Contraceptives for people who STATE they have so much Sex they are going broke paying for their own.

Once we accept the Premise of Contraceptives and Abortion as Financial Necessity for the Country, and the Well Being for all, then we start down a dangerous road of acceptance of Abortion as nothing more than a Cost saving Medical Procedure, instead of seeing it for what it is, the Slaughter of an Innocent Life. Lets work on ways to make Child Care more affordable, and forget about finding money to Pay for other's personal responsibility. There are a lot of things the Government need not be throwing money away on. We can find the money without having to sell out our Principles.
Peter

Sources:
Fox News - Obama administration to end funding for Texas health program over state's abortion law Published March 09, 2012

IWA for Sunday 012212

Baseball, Apple Pie, Abortion?

Hey folks,

What do you think of when someone says "As American as ???" Yup. If you are like me you think Baseball, Apple Pie, maybe even Rock and Roll. Elvis ETC. But the one thing I do not think about to describe America IS Abortion. That all may change soon...

That is if some in the Movement get their way. It is not a new concept. Some have wanted to GLORIFY Abortion for years. But the Latest incarnation of drive toward this is by our Idiot of the Week.

Now she is not stupid. She even tells the TRUTH. Abortion IS the Killing of a Life. But her point of view is SO? It is GOOD. I'm not making this up. According to The American Spectator - 'Abortion Is as American as Apple Pie' By George Neumayr on 1.19.12 @ 6:09AM

In 2004, Planned Parenthood began selling T-shirts emblazoned with the declaration, "I Had An Abortion." This was part of its campaign to "demystify and destigmatize" the practice. Prominent abortion advocates felt at the time that their movement had grown too timid.

Alexander Sanger, the grandson of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, argued that feminists needed to go beyond the rhetoric of "choice," jargon he regarded as cowardly and vague. They should celebrate abortion directly and unapologetically, he said. After all, the unborn child, as an annoying interloper, deserves to die. "The unborn child is not just an innocent life," he wrote, but a "liability, a threat, and a danger to the mother and to the other members of the family."

Amidst such comments, the website Imnotsorry.net sprung up. The founders of the site explained that it "was created for the purpose of showing women that exercising their legal right to terminate their pregnancy is not the blood-splattered guilt trip so many make it out to be." Space was provided on it for women to post testimonials expressing their "relief" and "joy" after an abortion.

Ron Fitzsimmons, president of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, also found "choice" rhetoric insipid. "We have nothing to hide," he said to the press. "The work we're doing is good. We are there to help women, and it's important to talk about abortion so that it's not a stigma."

Abortion, he said, is more than just a choice. It is a good choice: "We can no longer respond to [pro-life arguments] with 'it's your right to choose.' We need to recapture the notion that abortion is a difficult moral choice for women, but one that is, in fact, a moral choice."

You DO see how sick these people really are? It is MORAL for them to MURDER an Innocent Life? It is GOOD because the Life is a "liability, a threat, and a danger to the mother and to the other members of the family."Seriously. I almost wish THEIR Parents felt this way before they were Born.

But now we have a NEW advocate for this SICK and Demented attempt to Glorify MURDER...

These days abortion advocates are considerably more circumspect, returning to the "safe, legal, and rare" formula that Bill Clinton popularized. But a few still hunger for raw honesty. In apparent anticipation of the upcoming Roe v. Wade anniversary, Salon interviewed one of them on Monday. Merle Hoffman, a New York "abortion provider," told the online publication that the "pro-choice movement is uncomfortable with itself," as it still treats abortion as a regrettable act. "I've always said that, and I've always believed that," she said. "We're not comfortable with the banner we're under."

This makes no sense to Hoffman, given the large number of Americans implicated in abortion. "You know how many women have had abortions?" she said. "Abortion is as American as apple pie. I think it's one in three. But we'll go on TV and say, 'I just had my tits done or had a bikini wax,' but not had an abortion. If you could see that constituency rise up at one point in time -- but they don't, because there's this cloud."

Hoffman bluntly acknowledged that abortion involves killing an unborn child: "In the beginning [pro-lifers] were calling it a baby. We were saying it was only blood and tissue. Let's agree this is a life form, a potential life; you're terminating it. You don't have to argue that abortion stops a beating heart. It does." Nor does she insist that abortion is a minor medical procedure: "I can't say it's just like an appendectomy. It isn't. It's a very powerful and loaded decision."

Like Alexander Sanger, Hoffman sees abortion as a laudable act of self-defense against the encroaching unborn child. Referring to her own abortion, Hoffman writes in a soon-to-be-released memoir, Intimate Wars: "With my choice I was fighting for the right of all women to define abortion as an act of love: love for the family one already has, and just as important, love for oneself. I was fighting to reclaim abortion as a mother's act. It was an act of solidarity as significant as any other I had committed."

Hoffman's career as a founder and owner of an abortion clinic has been lucrative. Salon describes her as a bejeweled millionaire: "Impeccably coiffed -- signaling more Upper East Side doyenne than die-hard boomer activist -- she wears an enormous glittering ring she designed with the symbol of Choices, combining the caduceus and infinity symbols." The "Choices" to which the ring refers is the euphemistic name of the abortion clinic Hoffman runs. So her brutal honesty evidently has limits.

"I've always said that, and I've always believed that," she said. "We're not comfortable with the banner we're under." Because you KNOW it's a LIE. "You know how many women have had abortions?"Know how many people have Raped Women, Robbed Banks? Guess we should just make that Legal too. "Abortion is as American as apple pie." Complete and utter BS...Apple Pie does NOT MURDER Innocent, Defenseless Children. Abortion DOES. Abortion is LOVE??? You are a SICK, Demented, Murdering, Idiot.

You admit it. "In the beginning [pro-lifers] were calling it a baby. We were saying it was only blood and tissue. Let's agree this is a life form, a potential life;" Not Potential, IT is A life, with a name and Destiny to fulfill until someone like you PRAY on the Confused and uneducated Woman who is caring it. "You don't have to argue that abortion stops a beating heart. It does." Of course it DOES you Twit. "I can't say it's just like an appendectomy. It isn't. It's a very powerful and loaded decision." Yup. And I have never met a HAPPY Female that has had an Abortion. I know a FEW, and they ALL regret it.

Now this Twit wrote a book, or something. If you want to know what it is Google her. I'm not plugging her.

This is who these people are. Remember, Obama Voted FOR Infanticide THREE times when he was in the Senate. If the Baby actually survived? Just set it aside and let it DIE. Remember that? These people have NO Morals. They have no Intelligence. They have NO Faith. They are simply glorifying each other and making themselves feel better about themselves.

Congratulations Merle Hoffman, you are the Idiot of the Week. One thing I am extremely thankful, YOU are in the Extreme Minority.
Peter

Sources:
The American Spectator - 'Abortion Is as American as Apple Pie'

So Teaching Someone the Truth Is BAD?

If it may effect their Decision to do the right thing? I guess it IS bad.

Hey folks,

Are you looking at a health situation right now? Did someone tell you that you need Surgery? Have you looked into the FACTS and Options to this? I hope so. Are you looking to buy a Home? A Car? Have you looked into all the Facts and All the possible draw backs? Is it safe? Has the Car been flooded, in an accident? Is there alternatives? That may work better for you? Are you looking for a Job? Have you looked into all aspects? What is the Job description? Pay? ETC?

So when a Women becomes Pregnant, and then is contemplating making a decision to possibly Abort it, why is it WRONG for her to learn all the FACTS about what she is about to do? It's not. But it seems to be when it comes to the Liberal Pro-Death Libs. If it may effect their Decision to do the right thing? I guess it IS bad. Right?

According to AOL News - Michele Bachmann Proposes Mandatory Ultrasounds For Women Seeking Abortions

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) proposed a bill on Thursday that would force women in the early stages of pregnancy to have a physically invasive and medically unnecessary ultrasound procedure before they can legally consent to having an abortion.

OK stop right there. Have you even HAD an Ultrasound? My Wife has had many. It is NOT invasive. You lift your shirt, have some cream rubbed on your belly, and a wand is moved over you. Big Deal. That's not invasive.

The "Heartbeat Informed Consent Act" requires doctors to make the fetal heartbeat visible and audible to the woman prior to the abortion procedure and to describe the ultrasound image to her in detail, even if she prefers not to hear about it. If the woman is between four and five weeks pregnant, the doctor has to perform a "transvaginal ultrasound" in order to hear the heartbeat, which involves a probe and can be physically uncomfortable for the woman.

"It's similar to a pelvic exam, which can come with discomfort for the woman, and it's invasive," said Dr. Nancy Stanwood, an obstetrician and board member of the health advocacy group Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health. "It's also medically unnecessary. Some politicians might see it as ideologically necessary, but it's medically unnecessary, so the government telling you that you need to have one sounds ridiculous on many levels."

OH. OK. Now I get it. But this is not the reason why they do not want it. Just hang on. I may surprise some of you. But this is not why they do not want it. They do not want it because it will show Women that it REALLY is a Baby. It's NOT a Medical Procedure. It is NOT some mole or something. It is a BABY. A Human Being. It may make them change their mind. Which is the whole point.

Bachmann says the bill is intended to coax women who are considering getting abortions into changing their minds and carrying their pregnancies to term.

“A study by Focus on the Family found that when women who were undecided about having an abortion were shown an ultrasound image of the baby, 78% chose life," she said in a statement.

Now it goes on to talk about this Doctor that makes a living out of Murdering Innocent Lives, A Dr. Stanwood, who performs multiple Abortions a week, says it won't matter. Blah, blah, blah. But here is where I may surprise some of you. I AGREE. There should NOT be some Law requiring this.

OK I know, I know. What? Right? I do not feel that the Government should be creating new Laws that hinder our Freedoms. I do feel that the Government had NO RIGHT whatsoever to make Abortion Legal. I think it should be overturned. I think Abortion is the Murder of an Innocent Life. I think if a Doctor, decided that this was a part of the Procedure before they provide the Aborting, then I'm all for it. I do not think the Government should tell that Doctor NO. But right now, Abortion IS Legal. So, in that case, I do not want Government Creating Laws to FORCE someone to go through a Medical Procedure that is not Medically Necessary.

I can hear some of you now. "Pete, does that mean that Government should not restrict Abortion? Do you think that the Parental Notification should be done away with?" NO! A Minor is a Minor. If they can not get their ear pierced without Parental Notification, then they can not have an Abortion. I'm not for anarchy. I do not think Abortions {Late Term} should be INCREASED by Law either. As long as they are Legal. I say the Government needs to stay out of it. Just like anything else. I do not think the Federal Government should be interfering in State Rights on this or anything else either.

Would I like Women to learn what they are about to do? Have all the facts? Hear the Heart Beat. See the Baby? YES. But Government creating a Law to do it? No. Who is going to pay for that? ETC. Until it is overturned, we have to deal with it as is. Sorry Michele, I get what you are trying to do. I really do. But we can not tell the Government they can not mandate Obamacare, then say they CAN require us to spend money on Medical Procedures that are not Medically Necessary.
Peter

Sources:
AOL News - Michele Bachmann Proposes Mandatory Ultrasounds For Women Seeking Abortions

States Take Control

A Trend is starting to form.

Hey folks,

Happy Hump day to ya. That's right. Look around. What do States do if they feel the Federal Government is going in the wrong Direction or not doing enough? They take care of it themselves. They have the Legal and Constitutional RIGHT to do so. I know, I know, that does not sit well with the Obama Regime. He wants TOTAL power and control. But there still is that little thing called the Constitution and that little thing called the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, says that State DO have the right.

States have been doing this for years. But NOW? Now it is becoming a problem, because more and more are starting to stand up and say to Obama, "No." Prop 8 in California, various other States with similar Laws on Gay Marriage. All those Lawsuits in effect right now over Obamacare. Talks of ignoring ANYTHING to do with Cap and Tax. Of course, Arizona's new Illegal Immigration crack down, and now we have the Oklahoma Senate overriding Abortion Restriction Vetoes. This is sure to become a National Battle as well.

So what is happening? States are getting tired of the Federal Government either FAILING to enforce the FEDERAL Law, or they are getting tire of the Federal Government coming into their States and DICTATING to them what they can and can't do. They are standing up for their RIGHTS. It is a GREAT thing to see.

So of course there is this little thing called Immigration Reform going on in Arizona right now. The Governor says that her State is being overrun and hurt by Illegal Aliens. The Federal Government is failing to enforce the LAW. So, she signs a Bill telling the Police, "Start enforcing the Law." Now we are hearing every thing from "Nazis" to things like this piece from AOL NEWS that compare it to China, fascist Europe and the United States during segregation.

{Laughing} No. Not even the Obama State Run Media can make sense reporting this. "New Arizona Law Makes It Illegal to be in Arizona Illegally." What? If you are Illegal, you are already Illegal. Incredible. But I love this. From AOL NEWS - McCains Have Mixed Feelings About Ariz. Immigration Law

(April 26) -- Comments about Arizona's new immigration law from Sen. John McCain and his daughter Meghan indicate the issue isn't as simple as it might appear from outside the state. They also suggest it must ultimately be addressed from outside -- by the federal government.

You see. The Obama Regime doesn't enforce the Law. The State DOES. Now some want the Feral Government to come in and override. In essence, force the STATE to NOT enforce the Law. {Sigh} But here is what I love. Is John McCain NOT the Senator?

"That's a state decision. I have not had a chance to take a look, but the fact is, the state is acting because the federal government hasn't," he said. But McCain also acknowledged that he wasn't sure "whether all of it is legal or not," Politico's Ben Smith noted.

YOU are the Senator of the STATE! You are suppose to be REPRESENTING them in Congress. Not attempting to,,,{Sigh} never mind. But his Daughter said this. First she plays the Race Card, just like the Rev.s are revving up to do, but then she gets it RIGHT.

"But I also understand why this law came into existence in the first place," the senator's daughter said. She cited "the continued failure of the federal government to secure Arizona's borders" as well increased violence -- especially last month's killing of prominent Arizona rancher Robert Krentz, who was allegedly shot by an illegal immigrant.

70 percent of Arizonians are FOR this new Law. It does not violate ANYTHING. If you get pulled over by a Police Officer, what is the first thing they ask you for? Your Licence. They want to know who you are, where you live, and if you have the right to be here. Try to say no. See what happens to you. "Yeah well Pete, if you were speeding or violating the Law, of course the Police have the Right to ask who you are." HELLO? They are breaking the Law by just being here. I'll have more on this coming up in a few days. I want to answer a question I got, but just do not have time today.

Then you have this. Abortion. The Abortion issue has always been a big deal. Many States have place restrictions on their own Abortion policies. Many of which, the Residents of the States have Voted on. Oklahoma is one of them. In their State, there are two restrictions that you may or may not agree with. The majority of Oklahomans DO agree with them, but the Democrat Governor Vetoed them. Well, that has just been overridden. According to Newsmax.com - Okla. Senate Overrides Abortion Restriction Vetoes Tuesday, 27 Apr 2010 12:23 PM Article


The Oklahoma Senate has voted to override Gov. Brad Henry's vetoes of two abortion bills, meaning the bills become law without his signature.

The Republican-controlled Senate voted Tuesday to override the vetoes, a day after the House had done the same.

One of the bills requires women to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of the fetus before getting an abortion. The other prohibits pregnant women from seeking damages if physicians withhold information or provide inaccurate information about their pregnancy.

In other words, if you go to the Doctor, he tells you, you are Pregnant, yet does not tell you where to go and how to get an Abortion, you can't SUE him. The Federal Government wants to FORCE Doctors, regardless of what the Doctor wants, to tell women where and how to kill their kids. Oklahoma said screw you.

Like I said folks, there is a movement afoot. There is a feeling in the air. There is FINALLY, a feeling in this Country that the Federal Government is over stepping their authority and going WAY to far, to fast, down the Socialism Road. The States are starting to stand up and say enough is enough. There is a Conservatism uprising out there. Morals, Values, and Faith are making a comeback. Sanity and Logic are starting to be on display over Insanity and this quest for tyranny. The States have quite the battle on their hands. I hope their are ready for it. Gov. Christie is fixing NJ. Making the hard choices we will soon all have to make to fix this absolute ignorant mess that Obama and Crew have put us in. There are a record number of Conservatives coming out saying that they will run this year. The Democrats, no, the Liberal Loon Democrats, KNOW they are on their way out. BIG. But it is up to you out there. November 2010 is one of the most important Elections you will EVER take part in. Do it. Vote these Socialist Dictator Wannabes out, before it is to late to do it. Take a lesson from the States. Stand up, and say, enough is enough.
Peter

Sources"
AOL NEWS - McCains Have Mixed Feelings About Ariz. Immigration Law
Newsmax.com - Okla. Senate Overrides Abortion Restriction Vetoes

I Told You Judge Sonia Sotomayor Fits Obama Agenda

You heard it here first. Pro Amnesty, Anti Life, Liberal, Judicial Activist

Hey folks,

Happy Hump Day. For those of you who are true OPNers, Judge Sonia Sotomayor is no surprise. I told you back on May 5, 2009, that she fits the Obama Agenda. Democrats Want Lackey Judge

"There is speculation that he is looking at Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in NY. Remember her? Sotomayer was on the panel that rejected a new trial for the former radical activist, Judith Clark who is imprisoned for being the getaway driver in a 1981 Rockland County armored-truck robbery. The incident left three people dead, including two police officers.

"See? She is not a Radical. She did not advocate from the bench. She would make a great Judge. She was even appointed by President George H W Bush."

However, The Wall Street Journal called her a "liberal." The Free Congress Foundation called her a "Judicial Activist." Amnesty groups pushed for her confirmation in 98. She was confirmed on October 2, 1998 in a 67-29 vote, and she received her Commission on October 7.

She is a big Amnesty Advocate and a big Anti-Life Advocate. {Pro-Choice} So she fits the Obama Agenda...."

Obama did pick her yesterday. This is his choice for the highest court in the land. According to some news out there, she found her inspiration reading Nancy Drew. Uh, OK. She had a hard life. OK. She is Hispanic. You don't say. She is a Woman. Really? "A Victory for Latina Moms?" Of course the Left is calling this "Brilliant, Historic, Wise."

It's called Identity Politics. It is also called putting someone up, that RACE can be used to defend her, leaving facts aside, to get a lackey in place to further an agenda. If you dare say anything against her RECORD. Her own STATEMENTS. Her own ACTIONS. Then YOU are a Racists. That is how Obama got elected. This is how Sotomayor will be confirmed. But facts are facts.

Even the New York Times said this yesterday.

Judge Sotomayor "has issued no major decisions concerning abortion, the death penalty, gay rights or national security. In cases involving criminal defendants, employment discrimination and free speech, her rulings are more liberal than not."

It is clear who she is and where she stands. In 2001 when delivering the Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California-Berkeley Law School, Sotomayor said this.

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Some say this is a very controversial and even offensive statement. But that is what Obama TOLD you he was looking for. Not someone with experience in the Law. Not someone that believes in the Constitution, he doesn't, but someone that will rule by life experiences. Empathy.

Yes, with the MMD {Mainstream Media Drones} simply keep hammering that this is brilliant and you are a Racist if you disagree, and of course the fact she has a lot of friends on the Left that have the power to rush her into the Seat, this is a done deal. Elections have consequences. She can not be stopped. Look for Amnesty, Prop 8 to be visited, and of course Abortion, to be on the docket once she is in place. Constitutional Challenges? I doubt you would like the outcome of those. No folks. Another blow to Freedom and Democracy. Another Radical to be put in place.

The only way you can slow any of this down at all, is to get ready, get educated on what is happening right in front of you, and go VOTE when the time comes. Do it before your vote no longer matters.
Peter

Sources:
OPNTalk - Democrats Want Lackey Judge
NYT - Sotomayor’s Rulings Are Exhaustive but Often Narrow