OSAMA BIN LADEN KILLED

So they say.

Hey folks,

Happy Monday to ya. So I wonder what the news will be today? {Smile} Of course this is a rhetorical question. Obama announced that Osama bin Laden has been killed.

Now I'm not going to pretend to be a big Obama Supporter. You know better. I'm not going to pretend to know any "Facts" other than what you are being told in the Press. But I do have a friend working on figuring out the validity of this statement. Why? Because we already know Obama and Crew LIE CONSTANTLY.

Look, many think Osama bin Laden has been dead for years. Many think all those recordings have been completely bogus. Many think that this statement, "Bush couldn't get the Job done, but look how great Obama is, he got bin Laden." RIGHT before we get into the start of the 2012 Election process, when every Poll shows Obama LOSING to whomever the Republicans put up there, is well, questionable.

According to The Washington Post - OSAMA BIN LADEN KILLED; ‘JUSTICE HAS BEEN DONE’(- / AFP) By Philip Rucker, Scott Wilson and Anne E. Kornblut

Osama bin Laden, the longtime al-Qaeda leader, was killed Sunday by U.S. forces, President Obama announced. The chief architect of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks was buried at sea, the Associated Press reported, citing an administration source.

Buried at Sea? REALLY? Where is the proof? No body, just a Statement? Just a "We got him?" "Trust us?" "Obama is great?"

Even if we did get him, the credit goes to our Men and Women in the Armed Forces. Not some Moron that would rather be playing Golf instead of seeing why there is no FEMA in Alabama were the death count reached 345 today. Where is the outrage over Obama's slow response there? What about all those calls for Impeachment? This is Obama's Katrina. Where is the Outrage? I'll leave you to speculate on the RACE of those involved and draw your own conclusions.

Oh, never mind that. Forget the State of our Economy. Forget Unemployment. forget that pesky little "Third War" that Obama got us into over in Libya. Forget Oil Prices. "Look, he got bin Laden. He did what Bush couldn't do. He is GREAT." {Sigh}

Folks, if it was me, I would have brought bin Laden's body back here to the States. I would have Pictures, DNA, PROOF, that I could show those Families that lost loved ones, Justice HAS been done. I would not "bury him at Sea." He does not deserve such an Honour. I would have brought the Body back here and after I showed, not only the Families, but the World, "You attack us, we will stop at nothing until we get you." I would have had it cremated. But now we have no Body, no Proof, just a Statement?

But fret not, the Media has no need of Proof. All hail Obama.
Peter

Numbers Do Not Lie

It IS Obama's and the Left's fault

Hey folks,

I know, I know. We are going to deal with Numbers. We are going to talk about the National Debt. Some of you are thinking, "I'm not a numbers person. I'm not a money guy. This is boring to me." That may be the truth with a lot of people out there, but with the Looney Left attempting to go back to what brought them to the dance, "Blame Bush." So we have to look at this.

OK. You have a Bank account. Most Banks today, will let you run on a deficit. To a limit. Oh it will cost you a bit more, but they will let it "ride" so to speak. In other words, you go to pay your Mortgage. Your Mortgage is $1600.00. You only have $1400.00. the Bank will still pay it. However, NOW your account is -$230.00. When you get paid again, whatever you make, it subtracted this amount. $1000. minus $230.00, now your balance is $770.00. But the Mortgage is paid.

Here is what you do NOT do. Your account shows -$230.00? You do NOT repay $500.00 and say it's not your fault, you have to fix what was wrong. No. Because the OTHER $270.00 has NOTHING to do with the debt. Only YOU know what you are using the $270.00 for. The dept is nothing more than an excuse. Now if the debt IS $230.00, and you borrow $500.00 to repay that, you NOW owe $500.00. $230.00 of which you can blame the Mortgage on. The rest is all YOU.

This is what Obama and Crew are doing. "We have to spend all this to get us out of the mess Bush left us." This is SIMPLY not true. The numbers do not lie. According to CNS - Obama Added More to National Debt in First 19 Months Than All Presidents from Washington Through Reagan Combined, Says Gov’t Data Wednesday, September 08, 2010 By Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief

(CNSNews.com) - In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan.

The U.S. Treasury Department divides the federal debt into two categories. One is “debt held by the public,” which includes U.S. government securities owned by individuals, corporations, state or local governments, foreign governments and other entities outside the federal government itself. The other is “intragovernmental” debt, which includes I.O.U.s the federal government gives to itself when, for example, the Treasury borrows money out of the Social Security “trust fund” to pay for expenses other than Social Security.

At the end of fiscal year 1989, which ended eight months after President Reagan left office, the total federal debt held by the public was $2.1907 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That means all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan had accumulated only that much publicly held debt on behalf of American taxpayers. That is $335.3 billion less than the $2.5260 trillion that was added to the federal debt held by the public just between Jan. 20, 2009, when President Obama was inaugurated, and Aug. 20, 2010, the 19-month anniversary of Obama's inauguration.

I know, like I said, many are not numbers people. But I hope you really get this. This Regime, including Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Looney Left, are spending at a blinding rate to pay for a bunch or pet projects that they have wanted for years. Most of which, have NOTHING to do with Bush.

By contrast, President Reagan was sworn into office on Jan. 20, 1981 and left office eight years later on Jan. 20, 1989. At the end of fiscal 1980, four months before Reagan was inaugurated, the federal debt held by the public was $711.9 billion, according to CBO. At the end of fiscal 1989, eight months after Reagan left office, the federal debt held by the public was $2.1907 trillion. That means that in the nine-fiscal-year period of 1980-89--which included all of Reagan’s eight years in office--the federal debt held by the public increased $1.4788 trillion. That is in excess of a trillion dollars less than the $2.5260 increase in the debt held by the public during Obama’s first 19 months.

When President Barack Obama took the oath of office on Jan. 20, 2009, the total federal debt held by the public stood at 6.3073 trillion, according to the Bureau of the Public Debt, a division of the U.S. Treasury Department. As of Aug. 20, 2010, after the first nineteen months of President Obama’s 48-month term, the total federal debt held by the public had grown to a total of $8.8333 trillion, an increase of $2.5260 trillion.

In just the last four months (May through August), according to the CBO, the Obama administration has run cumulative deficits of $464 billion, more than the $458 billion deficit the Bush administration ran through the entirety of fiscal 2008.

That is more debt in FOUR MONTHS than Bush TOTAL. Are you getting this?

The CBO predicted this week that the annual budget deficit for fiscal 2010, which ends on the last day of this month, will exceed $1.3 trillion.

The first two fiscal years in which Obama has served will see the two biggest federal deficits as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product since the end of World War II.

“CBO currently estimates that the deficit for 2010 will be about $70 billion below last year’s total but will still exceed $1.3 trillion,” said the CBO’s monthly budget review for September, which was released yesterday. “Relative to the size of the economy, this year’s deficit is expected to be the second-largest shortfall in the past 65 years: At 9.1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), that deficit will be exceeded only by last year’s deficit of 9.9 percent of GDP.”

It is time to STOP blaming Bush. IT IS THE DEMOCRATS in power, and Obama in the White House. IT IS THE DEMOCRATS that are spending our Grand and Great Grand Kids into dept. They can blame Bush all they want. But the numbers tell the truth.
Peter

The Libs REALLY Want To Be Friends

Hey folks,

Yes the Libs REALLY want to be friends, with Iran, that is. It is unbelievably sad and actually, a little sickening, to watch. First , as I have been advising you of for the last two days of ABC’s "Good Morning America," and Diane Sawyer went to Iran to interview Little Hitler {President Ahmadinejad, for those who need a little more help in understanding} .

I pointed out the fact that it seemed from the interview that ABC was attempting to humanize Little Hitler. Show him as a nice guy. Someone we can deal with. Be friends with. Ask for his help.

Now it seems we have an ex-aid spewing out the normal LWL rhetoric. The Bush administration lied, covered up, and was just not fair. According to Reuters,

Controversy over a possible missed U.S. opportunity for rapprochement with Iran grew on Wednesday as former aide accused Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice of misleading Congress on the issue.

Flynt Leverett, who worked on the National Security Council when it was headed by Rice, said a proposal vetted by Tehran's most senior leaders was sent to the United States in May 2003 and was akin to the 1972 U.S. opening to China.

Speaking at a conference on Capitol Hill, Leverett said he was confident it was seen by Rice and then-Secretary of State Colin Powell but "the administration rejected the overture."

In the first three paragraphs you see how this is going to go. Let’s highlight, shall we? First, who WANTS rapprochement? They want us dead. They said so. They want Israel wiped of the map. They said so. They are supplying Iraq with weapons to kill our soldiers. They deny, but we have proof.

Second, A proposal was vetted in 2003? By leaders no longer in power. What did this proposal say? Then he says, he was confident that Rice saw it. No proof. Just confident. She said she didn’t. All through this there is speculation, accusation, NO PROOF. As usual.

Then you have this article from the Christian Science Monitor by Peter Grier

The US may be trying to achieve a difficult balance regarding Iran: pushing the Iranians hard enough so they will negotiate over their nuclear program, yet not so hard as to increase tensions in a part of the world that's already aflame.

That's the conclusion some experts draw from the recent US attempt to lay out evidence that officials say links Iran to attacks against US troops in Iraq.

For weeks the White House had promised that it would present proof that Tehran is meddling in Iraq by providing arms and training to Shiite militias. Yet when the presentation came, it was somewhat low-key. It took place in Baghdad, not Washington. It focused almost entirely on a type of dangerous roadside bomb that Iran is allegedly supplying to its Iraqi allies.

Washington "is not claiming this is decisive, and they're not blaming the [Iraqi] insurgency on Iran," says George Perkovich, a nuclear nonproliferation scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "This is part of a bigger diplomatic strategy, which is genuinely designed to try to put more pressure on Iran so it will want to negotiate, and will be more forthcoming when it does."

Now the good General Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, did say,

"That does not translate that the Iranian government per se, for sure, is directly involved in doing this, What it does say is that things made in Iran are being used in Iraq to kill coalition soldiers."

Whatever that means. Then you have this article from the NYT, in the Business Section. This is just completely, well, typical of the Left Wing Looney mentality.

Western political and economic pressure on Iran over its nuclear program has chilled foreign investment to the extent that it is now squeezing the country’s long-fragile energy industry, adding strains to a government that is burdened by sanctions and wary of unrest at home.

STOP!!! America is evil. The Bush Administration is evil. These unfair sanctions are hurting poor little Iran. Give me a break. Are these people serious? Actually they are, this is what is so sad. Then the article tries to blame Bush for these companies not wanting to help out Iran. They have this Quote,

"Oil companies are simply assessing risk, including what some see as the real risk of a military strike against Iran," said Cliff Kupchan, an analyst at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consulting firm, and a former senior State Department official. "Some are deciding it’s not worth it."

If Iran would stop suppling our enemies with weapons to kill our soldiers, stop saying they want us dead, stop trying to build nuclear bombs, they would not have to worry about being blown up. It really is that simple.

As far as this concept that yes, the weapons came from Iran, but we do not know who ordered it. Who cares? We sue people all the time in this country. Smith and Wesson for making a gun that killed someone. Tobacco Companies for making a product that kills. If they made it, they are responsible for it. Besides all that,

"Based on our understanding of the Iranian system and the history of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp operations, the intelligence community assesses that activity this extensive on the part of the Quds Force would not be conducted without approval from top leaders in Iran," said a senior intelligence official.

Yes folks, America is evil, Iran is oppressed by this big bad Bush administration. We are the cause of all the problems in the world. Amazing. Let’s just be friends.
Peter

Sources:
Reuters-Ex-aide says Rice misled U.S. Congress on Iran
CSM-US aim in prodding Iran: negotiation?
NYT- West Adds to Strains on Iran’s Lifeline
Reuters-Bush says confident Iran provided weapons in Iraq